84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]金少楓,蘇坤陽(yáng),陳畢能,等.超聲引導(dǎo)下經(jīng)皮松解術(shù)治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折非手術(shù)治療后腕部指屈肌腱粘連[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2022,34(08):12-19,24.
　JIN Shaofeng,SU Kunyang,CHEN Bineng,et al.Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release for treatment of wrist digital flexor tendon adhesions following non-surgical treatment of distal radius fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(08):12-19,24.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

超聲引導(dǎo)下經(jīng)皮松解術(shù)治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折非手術(shù)治療后腕部指屈肌腱粘連()
分享到：

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第34卷
期數(shù):
2022年08期
頁(yè)碼:
12-19,24
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release for treatment of wrist digital flexor tendon adhesions following non-surgical treatment of distal radius fractures in the aged
作者:
金少楓; 蘇坤陽(yáng); 陳畢能; 林友聰; 呂輝照
(中國(guó)人民解放軍聯(lián)勤保障部隊(duì)第九一〇醫(yī)院,福建 泉州 362000)
Author(s):
JIN Shaofeng; SU Kunyang; CHEN Bineng; LIN Youcong; LYU Huizhao
The 910th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army,Quanzhou 362000,Fujian,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
橈骨骨折;  老年人;  指淺屈肌腱;  指深屈肌腱;  肌腱粘連;  肌腱粘連松解;  超聲引導(dǎo);  臨床試驗(yàn)
Keywords:
radius fractures;  aged;  tendon of flexor digitorum superficialis;  flexor digitorum profundus tendon;  tendon adhesion;  tenolysis;  ultrasound-guided;  clinical trial
摘要:
目的:探討超聲引導(dǎo)下經(jīng)皮松解術(shù)治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折非手術(shù)治療后腕部指屈肌腱粘連的臨床療效和安全性。方法:將58例老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折非手術(shù)治療后腕部指淺、深屈肌腱粘連患者隨機(jī)分為2組,其中經(jīng)皮松解組(33例)采用超聲引導(dǎo)下經(jīng)皮肌腱粘連松解術(shù)治療,切開(kāi)松解組(25例)采用切開(kāi)肌腱粘連松解術(shù)治療。分別于術(shù)前和術(shù)后1周,采用視覺(jué)模擬量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)評(píng)分評(píng)價(jià)手指疼痛程度; 分別于術(shù)前和術(shù)后3個(gè)月,采用手指關(guān)節(jié)總主動(dòng)活動(dòng)度(total active movement,TAM)評(píng)價(jià)手指活動(dòng)能力,采用手部功能獨(dú)立性量表(functional independence measure,FIM)評(píng)價(jià)手指日常生活活動(dòng)能力,采用明尼蘇達(dá)手靈巧度測(cè)驗(yàn)(Minnesota manual dexterity test,MMDT)評(píng)價(jià)手指靈巧度,通過(guò)超聲測(cè)量肌腱移動(dòng)度和粘連帶厚度以評(píng)價(jià)肌腱粘連程度; 并觀察并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況。結(jié)果:①手指疼痛VAS評(píng)分。術(shù)前,2組患者的手指疼痛VAS評(píng)分比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(1.9±1.0)分,(2.0±0.9)分,t=-0.323,P=0.748]; 術(shù)后1周,經(jīng)皮松解組的VAS評(píng)分低于切開(kāi)松解組[(1.6±0.9)分,(3.4±1.4)分,t=-6.191,P=0.001],經(jīng)皮松解組的VAS評(píng)分與術(shù)前的差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=0.964,P=0.339),切開(kāi)松解組的VAS評(píng)分高于術(shù)前(t=-5.309,P=0.001)。②手指關(guān)節(jié)TAM。術(shù)前和術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的手指關(guān)節(jié)TAM比較,組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[136.2°±19.4°,140.1°±17.9°,t=-0.909,P=0.366; 211.8°±18.6°,203.8°±14.3°,t=1.378,P=0.062]; 術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的手指關(guān)節(jié)TAM均高于術(shù)前(t=-4.597,P=0.001; t=-6.211,P=0.001)。③手部FIM評(píng)分。術(shù)前和術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的手部FIM評(píng)分比較,組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(17.4±3.4)分,(16.7±3.3)分,t=0.213,P=0.832;(36.7±4.2)分,(35.8±4.8)分,t=0.291,P=0.772]; 術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的手部FIM評(píng)分均高于術(shù)前(t=-3.000,P=0.004; t=-5.214,P=0.001)。④MMDT結(jié)果。術(shù)前和術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的放置測(cè)驗(yàn)所需時(shí)間比較,組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(339.6±19.2)s,(336.6±18.9)s,t=0.686,P=0.495;(208.65±18.2)s,(211.9±17.7)s,t=-0.429,P=0.620]; 術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的放置測(cè)驗(yàn)所需時(shí)間均短于術(shù)前(t=5.691,P=0.001; t=4.929,P=0.001)。術(shù)前和術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的翻轉(zhuǎn)測(cè)驗(yàn)所需時(shí)間比較,組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(287.7±16.3)s,(284.3±15.0)s,t=0.928,P=0.356;(171.7±12.2)s,(174.0±14.7)s,t=-0.506,P=0.583]; 術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的翻轉(zhuǎn)測(cè)驗(yàn)所需時(shí)間均短于術(shù)前(t=2.539,P=0.014; t=2.799,P=0.009)。⑤肌腱移動(dòng)度和粘連帶厚度。術(shù)前和術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的肌腱移動(dòng)度比較,組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(10.6±3.3)mm,(9.7±3.9)mm,t=0.503,P=0.586;(25.9±4.5)mm,(24.2±5.2)mm,t=0.784,P=0.443]; 術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的肌腱移動(dòng)度均大于術(shù)前(t=-25.132,P=0.001; t=-31.986,P=0.001)。術(shù)前和術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的肌腱粘連帶厚度比較,組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(6.7±0.3)mm,(6.5±0.4)mm,t=0.622,P=0.541;(3.1±0.2)mm,(3.1±0.3)mm,t=0.133,P=0.982]; 術(shù)后3個(gè)月,2組患者的肌腱粘連帶厚度均小于術(shù)前(t=13.349,P=0.001; t=18.573,P=0.001)。⑥并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況。經(jīng)皮松解組出現(xiàn)切口淺表感染、切口延遲愈合、切口血腫、正中神經(jīng)損傷、腕部肌腱再粘連各1例,切開(kāi)松解組出現(xiàn)切口淺表感染2例、切口血腫1例、切口延遲愈合3例、正中神經(jīng)損傷1例、腕部肌腱再粘連5例。經(jīng)皮松解組患者的并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率低于切開(kāi)松解組(χ2=7.408,P=0.006)。結(jié)論:超聲引導(dǎo)下經(jīng)皮松解術(shù)與切開(kāi)松解術(shù)治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折非手術(shù)治療后腕部指屈肌腱粘連的療效相當(dāng),但前者較后者創(chuàng)傷更小、安全性更高。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical outcomes and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous release for treatment of wrist digital flexor tendon(DFT)adhesions in aged patients who underwent non-surgical treatment for distal radius fractures.Methods:Fifty-eight aged patients suffered from superficial and deep DFT adhesions in wrist after non-surgical treatment of distal radius fractures were randomly divided into percutaneous adhesiolysis group(33 cases)and open adhesiolysis group(25 cases).The patients in percutaneous adhesiolysis group were treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous tendon adhesiolysis,while the ones in open adhesiolysis group with open tendon adhesiolysis.The finger pain degree was evaluated by using visual analogue scale(VAS)score before the surgery and at postsurgical week 1 respectively.The activity ability,activity of daily living(ADL)and dexterity of finger were evaluated by using finger total active movement(TAM),hand functional independence measure(FIM)and Minnesota manual dexterity test(MMDT)respectively,and the tendon adhesion degree was evaluated by measuring tendon range of motion(ROM)and adhesion band thickness using ultrasound before the surgery and at postsurgical month 3 respectively.Moreover,the complications were observed.Results:①There was no statistical difference in finger pain VAS score between the 2 groups before the surgery(1.9±1.0 vs 2.0±0.9 points,t=-0.323,P=0.748).The finger pain VAS scores were lower in percutaneous adhesiolysis group compared to open adhesiolysis group at postsurgical week 1(1.6±0.9 vs 3.4±1.4 points,t=-6.191,P=0.001),and it was not significantly different from each other between pre-surgery and postsurgical week 1 in percutaneous adhesiolysis group(t=0.964,P=0.339),while it increased in open adhesiolysis group at postsurgical week 1 compared to pre-surgery(t=-5.309,P=0.001).②There was no statistical difference in finger TAM between the 2 groups before the surgery and at postsurgical month 3(136.2±19.4 vs 140.1±17.9 degrees,t=-0.909,P=0.366; 211.8±18.6 vs 203.8±14.3 degrees,t=1.378,P=0.062).The finger TAM increased in the 2 groups at postsurgical month 3 compared to pre-surgery(t=-4.597,P=0.001; t=-6.211,P=0.001).③There was no statistical difference in hand FIM score between the 2 groups before the surgery and at postsurgical month 3(17.4±3.4 vs 16.7±3.3 points,t=0.213,P=0.832; 36.7±4.2 vs 35.8±4.8 points,t=0.291,P=0.772).The hand FIM scores increased in the 2 groups at postsurgical month 3 compared to pre-surgery(t=-3.000,P=0.004; t=-5.214,P=0.001).④There was no statistical difference in the time spent in placing test between the 2 groups before the surgery and at postsurgical month 3(339.6±19.2 vs 336.6±18.9 seconds,t=0.686,P=0.495; 208.65±18.2 vs 211.9±17.7 seconds,t=-0.429,P=0.620).The time spent in placing test decreased in the 2 groups at postsurgical month 3 compared to pre-surgery(t=5.691,P=0.001; t=4.929,P=0.001).There was no statistical difference in the time spent in turning test between the 2 groups before the surgery and at postsurgical month 3(287.7±16.3 vs 284.3±15.0 seconds,t=0.928,P=0.356; 171.7±12.2 vs 174.0±14.7 seconds,t=-0.506,P=0.583).The time spent in turning test decreased in the 2 groups at postsurgical month 3 compared to pre-surgery(t=2.539,P=0.014; t=2.799,P=0.009).⑤There was no statistical difference in tendon ROM between the 2 groups before the surgery and at postsurgical month 3(10.6±3.3 vs 9.7±3.9 mm,t=0.503,P=0.586; 25.9±4.5 vs 24.2±5.2 mm,t=0.784,P=0.443).The tendon ROM increased in the 2 groups at postsurgical month 3 compared to pre-surgery(t=-25.132,P=0.001; t=-31.986,P=0.001).There was no statistical difference in the thickness of tendon adhesion band between the 2 groups before the surgery and at postsurgical month 3(6.7±0.3 vs 6.5±0.4 mm,t=0.622,P=0.541; 3.1±0.2 vs 3.1±0.3 mm,t=0.133,P=0.982).The thickness of tendon adhesion band decreased in the 2 groups at postsurgical month 3 compared to pre-surgery(t=13.349,P=0.001; t=18.573,P=0.001).⑥The superficial incision infection,incision delayed healing,incision hematoma,median nerve injury and wrist tendon readhesion were found in 1 patient respectively in percutaneous adhesiolysis group,while the superficial incision infection(2 cases),incision hematoma(1 case),incision delayed healing(3 cases),median nerve injury(1 case)and wrist tendon readhesion(5 cases)were found in open adhesiolysis group.The incidence rate of postoperative complications was lower in percutaneous adhesiolysis group compared to open adhesiolysis group(χ2=7.408,P=0.006).Conclusion:Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tendon adhesiolysis is similar to open tendon adhesiolysis in the clinical outcomes in treatment of wrist DFT adhesions in aged patients who underwent non-surgical treatment for distal radius fractures,while the former displays the advantages of less surgical injury and higher safety compared to the latter.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] 孫軼韜,馬奇翰,戴宇祥,等.橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的中醫(yī)非手術(shù)治療及相關(guān)并發(fā)癥的研究進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(1):43-45.
[2] 段星星,馬奇翰,高鋒,等.紙夾板聯(lián)合木夾板固定治療閉合性橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(5):24-27.
[3] CHUNG K C,MALAY S,SHAUVER M J,et al.Assessment of distal radius fracture complications among adults 60 years or older:a secondary analysis of the wrist randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA Netw Open,2019,2(1):187053.
[4] FANUELE J,KOVAL K J,LURIE J,et al.Distal radial fracture treatment:what you get may depend on your age and address[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2009,91(6):1313-1319.
[5] 顧玉東,王澍寰,侍德.手外科手術(shù)學(xué)[M].上海:復(fù)旦大學(xué)出版社,2010:54-67.
[6] HIGGINS A,LALONDE D H,BELL M,et al.Avoiding flexor tendon repair rupture with intraoperative total active movement examination[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2010,126(3):941-945.
[7] RIBEIRO D K M N,LENARDT M H,LOURENÇO T M,et al.The use of the functional independence measure in elderly[J].Rev Gaucha Enferm,2018,38(4):e66496.
[8] WANG Y C,WICKSTROM R,YEN S C,et al.Assessing manual dexterity:comparing the workability rate of manipulation test with the minnesota manual dexterity test[J].J Hand Ther,2018,31(3):339-347.
[9] BIANCHI S,BEAULIEU J Y,POLETTI P A.Ultrasound of local complications in hand surgery:a pictorial essay[J].J Ultrasound,2020,23(3):349-362.
[10] AZAR F M,BEATY J H,CANALE S T.坎貝爾骨科手術(shù)學(xué):第13版[M].唐佩福,王巖,盧世壁,等譯.北京:北京大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)出版社,2018:2364-2365.
[11] VAN DELFT E A K,BLOEMERS F W,SOSEF N L,et al.Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients:4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction,a multicentre randomised controlled trial,study protocol[J].BMJ Open,2019,9(3):e026540.
[12] DEGEORGE B R,MWANGI R,LARSON A N,et al.Outcomes and complications in the management of distal radial fractures in the elderly[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2020,102(1):37-44.
[13] CHAO W Q,AZMAN M Z,ROSDI S A,et al.Epidemiology and factors affecting functional outcome of distal radial fracture in an Urban Tertiary Medical Centre in Malaysia[J].Malays Orthop J,2021,15(3):84-90.
[14] KAMAL R N,RUCH D S.Volar capsular release after distal radius fractures[J].J Hand Surg Am,2017,42(12):1034.
[15] ZHANG Q,YANG Y,YILDIRIMER L,et al.Advanced technology-driven therapeutic interventions for prevention of tendon adhesion:design,intrinsic and extrinsic factor considerations[J].Acta Biomater,2021,124:15-32.
[16] 張明敏,任高宏.醫(yī)用生物材料在肌腱損傷后粘連防治中的應(yīng)用[J].中國(guó)修復(fù)重建外科雜志,2020,34(8):1065-1070.
[17] MENG J,YU P,TONG J,et al.Hydrogen treatment reduces tendon adhesion and inflammatory response[J/OL].J Cell Biochem,2018[2021-12-23].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30367509/.
[18] ALIMOHAMMADI M,AGHLI Y,FAKHRAEI O,et al.Electrospun nanofibrous membranes for preventing tendon adhesion[J].ACS Biomater Sci Eng,2020,6(8):4356-4376.
[19] 江紅艷,劉守正,葛恒清.超聲引導(dǎo)下針刀松解治療拇長(zhǎng)屈肌腱狹窄性腱鞘炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(8):59-61.
[20] WAND J,QIAN L,LIU Z F,et al.Ultrasonographic assessment in vivo of the excursion and tension of flexor digitorum profundus tendon on different rehabilitation protocols after tendon repair[J/OL].J Hand Ther,2021[2021-12-23].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33820710/.
[21] PETROVER D,RICHETTE P.Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome:from ultrasonography to ultrasound guided carpal tunnel release[J].Joint Bone Spine,2018,85(5):545-552.
[22] BRUDER A M,SHIELDS N,DODD K J,et al.A progressive exercise and structured advice program does not improve activity more than structured advice alone following a distal radial fracture:a multi-centre,randomised trial[J].J Physiother,2016,62(3):145-152.
[23] TITAN A L,FOSTER D S,CHANG J,et al.Flexor tendon:development,healing,adhesion formation,and contributing growth factors[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2019,144(4):639-647.
[24] KORSTANJE J W,SOETERS J N,SCHREUDERS T A,et al.Ultrasonographic assessment of flexor tendon mobilization:effect of different protocols on tendon excursion[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2012,94(5):394-402.
[25] PLOTKIN B,SAMPATH S C,SAMPATH S C,et al.MR imaging and us of the wrist tendons[J].Radiographics,2016,36(6):1688-1700.
(收稿日期:2022-01-13 本文編輯:時(shí)紅磊)

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]溫超海,何忠,李永斌,等.閉合復(fù)位伽瑪釘改良成鎖定支架內(nèi)固定治療 老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[2]張容超,徐衛(wèi)國(guó),萬(wàn)春友,等.手法整復(fù)小夾板固定治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折168例[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):61.
[3]孫群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定治療 老年不穩(wěn)定型股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[4]方策,倪新宇,王宏偉,等.遲氏正骨手法復(fù)位單臂外固定支架固定治療 老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[5]徐善強(qiáng),陳星,張興平,等.功能鍛煉對(duì)橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折拆除石膏外固定后 腕關(guān)節(jié)康復(fù)的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):58.
[6]趙萌,陳云豐,周祖忠.切開(kāi)復(fù)位T形鋼板聯(lián)合空心釘內(nèi)固定治療 MasonⅢ型橈骨頭骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):58.
[7]劉昕,鄧志強(qiáng),葉家軍.撬撥復(fù)位彈性髓內(nèi)釘固定治療JudetⅣ型兒童橈骨頸骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):65.
[8]劉欣,劉文剛,吳淮,等.3種方法治療C型橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的對(duì)比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):12.
　LIU Xin,LIU Wengang,WU Huai,et al.A comparative study of three methods for treatment of type C distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):12.
[9]郭世明,石玲玲,郭志民,等.手法復(fù)位石膏外固定和切開(kāi)復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定治療 骨質(zhì)疏松性橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的比較研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(04):15.
　GUO Shiming,SHI Lingling,GUO Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):15.
[10]鄭艷峰,吳勛,周榮昌,等.股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定與動(dòng)力髖螺釘內(nèi)固定治療 老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折的對(duì)比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(04):24.
　ZHENG Yanfeng,WU Xun,ZHOU Rongchang,et al.A comparative study of proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation versus dynamic hip screw internal fixation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):24.
[11]聶偉志,隋顯玉.牽屈復(fù)位半管形石膏固定治療老年Colles骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(03):50.
[12]謝正虎,董霞,袁榮霞,等.手法復(fù)位夾板外固定與切開(kāi)復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端C型骨折的比較研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(10):18.
　XIE Zhenghu,DONG Xia,YUAN Rongxia,et al.A comparative study of manipulative reduction and splint external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of type-C fractures of distal radius in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(08):18.
[13]彭松云,熊屹,唐良華,等.自制量表在非手術(shù)治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折療效評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2020,32(03):42.
[14]鄭立程,季瀅瑤,趙政.外固定支架結(jié)合Kapandji技術(shù)治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端不穩(wěn)定性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2020,32(03):67.
[15]王用玉,陳博,許坤,等.口服補(bǔ)腎活血中藥治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折臨床療效的Meta分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(09):25.
　WANG Yongyu,CHEN Bo,XU Kun,et al.Clinical efficacy of oral application of Bushen Huoxue(補(bǔ)腎活血)traditional Chinese drugs for treatment of distal radius fractures in the aged:a meta-analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(08):25.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
通訊作者:林友聰 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01