84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]羅金金,丁彩田.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)后脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的影響因素分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2022,34(08):8-11.
 LUO Jinjin,DING Caitian.Analysis of factors influencing the degree of improvement of spinal kyphosis deformity after percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(08):8-11.
點擊復制

骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)后脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的影響因素分析()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第34卷
期數(shù):
2022年08期
頁碼:
8-11
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of factors influencing the degree of improvement of spinal kyphosis deformity after percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
作者:
羅金金1丁彩田2
(1.余姚市中醫(yī)醫(yī)院,浙江 余姚 315400; 2.義烏市中心醫(yī)院,浙江 義烏 322000)
Author(s):
LUO Jinjin1DING Caitian2
1.Yuyao Hospital of TCM,Yuyao 315400,Zhejiang,China 2.Yiwu Central Hospital,Yiwu 322000,Zhejiang,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
骨質(zhì)疏松性骨折 骨折壓縮性 脊柱骨折 后凸成型術(shù) 脊柱后凸
Keywords:
osteoporotic fractures fracturescompression spinal fractures kyphoplasty kyphosis
摘要:
目的:探討骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)后脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的影響因素。方法:收集2018年11月至2020年11月在余姚市中醫(yī)醫(yī)院接受PKP治療的OVCF患者的病例資料,包括患者的性別、年齡、骨折節(jié)段、病程、骨密度T值、體質(zhì)量指數(shù)、骨水泥注入量、骨水泥滲漏椎體數(shù)等資料。提取患者手術(shù)前后的脊柱X線片,測量手術(shù)前后的傷椎椎體高度和Cobb角,計算傷椎椎體前緣高度比、傷椎椎體中間高度比和脊柱后凸畸形改善程度。比較手術(shù)前后傷椎椎體前緣高度比、傷椎椎體中間高度比、傷椎Cobb角的變化情況。觀察年齡、病程、骨密度T值、體質(zhì)量指數(shù)、骨水泥注入量、骨水泥滲漏椎體數(shù)、術(shù)前傷椎椎體前緣高度比、術(shù)前傷椎椎體中間高度比、術(shù)前傷椎Cobb角與脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的相關(guān)性,并采用多因素Logistic回歸分析研究OVCF 患者PKP術(shù)后脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的影響因素。結(jié)果:①一般結(jié)果。納入研究的患者共150例,男79例、女71例,年齡(71.51±5.65)歲,骨折節(jié)段為T955例、T1042例、T1153例,病程(9.90±4.72)d,骨密度T值-3.12±0.34,體質(zhì)量指數(shù)(21.35±1.73)kg·m-2,骨水泥注入量(4.18±0.56)mL,骨水泥滲漏椎體數(shù)3個。患者術(shù)前、術(shù)后24 h、術(shù)后6個月傷椎椎體前緣高度比、傷椎椎體中間高度比、傷椎Cobb角的比較,總體差異有統(tǒng)計學意義[(62.13±10.27)%,(75.85±12.11)%,(76.12±12.09)%,F=50.620,P=0.000;(66.15±11.34)%,(80.26±12.63)%,(81.33±12.17)%,F=74.045,P=0.000; 18.01°±7.74°,12.52°±6.39°,12.01°±6.31°,F=24.802,P=0.000],術(shù)后24 h、術(shù)后6個月的傷椎椎體前緣高度比、傷椎椎體中間高度比、傷椎Cobb角均較術(shù)前改善(P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.000,P=0.000)。②影響脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的單因素分析結(jié)果。年齡、病程、體質(zhì)量指數(shù)、骨水泥滲漏椎體數(shù)與脊柱后凸畸形改善程度均不存在直線相關(guān)關(guān)系(r=0.652,P=0.086; r=-0.162,P=0.073; r=0.057,P=0.528; r=-0.103,P=0.276),骨水泥注入量、術(shù)前傷椎Cobb角與脊柱后凸畸形改善程度均呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系(r=0.211,P=0.024; r=0.625,P=0.000),骨密度T值、術(shù)前傷椎椎體前緣高度比、術(shù)前傷椎椎體中間高度比與脊柱后凸畸形改善程度均呈負相關(guān)關(guān)系(r=-0.521,P=0.000; r=-0.236,P=0.004; r=-0.342,P=0.000)。③影響脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的多因素Logistic回歸分析結(jié)果。以骨密度T值、術(shù)前傷椎Cobb角、術(shù)前傷椎椎體前緣高度比、術(shù)前傷椎椎體中間高度比、骨水泥注入量為自變量,以脊柱后凸畸形改善程度為因變量,進行多因素Logistic回歸分析。結(jié)果顯示,骨密度T值、術(shù)前傷椎Cobb角是脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的影響因素(b=-1.339,P=0.000,OR=0.262; b=0.195,P=0.000,OR=1.215)。結(jié)論:術(shù)前傷椎Cobb角和骨密度是OVCF患者PKP術(shù)后脊柱后凸畸形改善程度的影響因素。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the factors influencing the degree of improvement of spinal kyphosis deformity in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF)after percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP).Methods:The medical records of patients who underwent PKP for treatment of OVCF in Yuyao Hospital of TCM from November 2018 to November 2020 were collected,and their information including gender,age,fractured segment,disease course,T-value of bone mineral density(BMD),body mass index(BMI),consumption of bone cement and the number of vertebrae with bone cement leakage was extracted from the electronic medical record system,and the spinal X-ray films taken before and after the PKP were extracted for measuring presurgical and postsurgical height and Cobb's angle of injured vertebrae and calculating injured vertebrae anterior border height ratio,injured vertebrae middle height ratio and degree of improvement of spinal kyphosis.The changes of anterior border height ratio,middle height ratio and Cobb's angle of injured vertebrae were compared between pre-PKP and post-PKP.The correlations between the degree of improvement of spinal kyphosis and the factors including age,disease course,T-value of BMD,BMI,consumption of bone cement,the number of vertebrae with bone cement leakage,presurgical injured vertebrae anterior border height ratio,presurgical injured vertebrae middle height ratio,presurgical injured vertebrae Cobb's angle were analysed,and a multi-factor logistic regression analysis was conducted for researching the factors influencing the improvement degree of spinal kyphosis in OVCF patients after PKP.Results:①One hundred and fifty OVCF patients were enrolled in the study,including 79 males and 71 females with age,disease course,T-value of BMD,BMI,consumption of bone cement and the number of vertebrae with bone cement leakage as 71.51±5.65 years,9.90±4.72 days,-3.12±0.34 SD,21.35±1.73 kg/m(2),4.18±0.56 mL and 3; and the factures located at T9(55 cases),T10(42 cases)and T11(53 cases).There was statistical difference in anterior border height ratio,middle height ratio and Cobb's angle of injured vertebrae between pre-PKP,postsurgical hour 24 and postsurgical month 6 in general(62.13±10.27,75.85±12.11,76.12±12.09%,F=50.620,P=0.000; 66.15±11.34,80.26±12.63,81.33±12.17%,F=74.045,P=0.000; 18.01±7.74,12.52±6.39,12.01±6.31 degrees,F=24.802,P=0.000),and the anterior border height ratio,middle height ratio and Cobb's angle of injured vertebrae were improved at postsurgical hour 24 and month 6 compared to pre-PKP(P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.000,P=0.000).②There was no linear correlations between the improvement degree of spinal kyphosis and the factors including age,disease course,BMI and the number of vertebrae with bone cement leakage(r=0.652,P=0.086; r=-0.162,P=0.073; r=0.057,P=0.528; r=-0.103,P=0.276).The improvement degree of spinal kyphosis was positively correlated with the consumption of bone cement and presurgical injured vertebrae Cobb's angle(r=0.211,P=0.024; r=0.625,P=0.000),while was negatively correlated with the T-value of BMD,presurgical injured vertebrae anterior border height ratio and presurgical injured vertebrae middle height ratio(r=-0.521,P=0.000; r=-0.236,P=0.004; r=-0.342,P=0.000).③The multi-factor logistic regression analysis was conducted by taking T-value of BMD,presurgical injured vertebrae Cobb's angle,presurgical injured vertebrae anterior border height ratio,presurgical injured vertebrae middle height ratio and consumption of bone cement as independent variable and the improvement degree of spinal kyphosis as dependent variable respectively,and the results showed that the T-value of BMD and presurgical injured vertebrae Cobb's angle were the factors influencing the improvement degree of spinal kyphosis(b=-1.339,P=0.000,OR=0.262; b=0.195,P=0.000,OR=1.215).Conclusion:The presurgical injured vertebrae Cobb's angle and BMD are the factors influencing the improvement degree of spinal kyphosis in OVCF patients after PKP.

參考文獻/References:

[1] WANG N,LI J,SONG H,et al.Synthesis and anti-osteoporosis activity of novel Teriparatide glycosylation derivatives[J].RSC Advances,2020,10(43):25730-25735.
[2] 湯雄杰.經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)與后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的療效比較[J].實用醫(yī)技雜志,2019,26(10):1313-1314.
[3] FENG L,FENG C,CHEN J,et al.The risk factors of vertebral refracture after kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:a study protocol for a prospective cohort study[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2018,19(1):195.
[4] LIN J,QIAN L,JIANG C,et al.Bone cement distribution is a potential predictor to the reconstructive effects of unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty in OVCFs:a retrospective study[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2018,13(1):140.
[5] 施亞君,孫波波.經(jīng)皮穿刺椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮性骨折圍手術(shù)期護理[J].現(xiàn)代實用醫(yī)學,2019,31(9):1245-1246.
[6] 劉朋偉,邢蘭坤,何海峰,等.單側(cè)彎角椎體成形術(shù)治療OVCF的近遠期療效分析[J].頸腰痛雜志,2020,41(4):499-500.
[7] SZPALSKI M,GUNZBURG R.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮性骨折[M].黨耕町,譯.北京:人民衛(wèi)生出版社,2007:62-65.
[8] 張韜,歷文佳,朱學軍,等.PVP與PKP治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮性骨折的療效及安全性比較[J].糖尿病天地,2018,15(7):168.
[9] 楊海軍.PKP和PVP治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮性骨折的對比評估[J].中外醫(yī)療,2021,40(1):45-47.
[10] 劉培太,張軍,吳碩柱.經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)后殘留腰背痛和再骨折原因分析[J].頸腰痛雜志,2018,39(2):243-244.
[11] 杜桂夏,汪來杰,周廣偉,等.高黏度骨水泥PVP技術(shù)與常規(guī)PKP手術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的療效對比[J].頸腰痛雜志,2019,40(1):132-133.
[12] 范鑫,許超.PKP術(shù)后椎體高度再丟失臨床研究進展[J].浙江中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志,2020,30(2):170-174.
[13] 邱偉,黃朝靖,姜迪,等.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折行PKP術(shù)后骨延遲愈合的相關(guān)因素探討[J].頸腰痛雜志,2019,40(1):46-48.
[14] 張威,朱立國,李學朋,等.五點支撐功能鍛煉對骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮性骨折PKP術(shù)后患者后凸畸形及功能恢復的影響[J].北京中醫(yī)藥,2019,38(3):267-269.
[15] 盛紅楓,謝建毅,石道敏.過伸牽引復位法結(jié)合經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療腰椎壓縮性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2018,30(7):67-69.
[16] 何倫相,吳大國,陳強.胸腰椎患者骨折術(shù)后后凸畸形發(fā)生情況及影響因素分析[J].實用醫(yī)院臨床雜志,2019,16(4):40-43.
[17] 王蔚.骨密度測量診斷骨質(zhì)疏松癥臨床應用及報告解讀[J].山西職工醫(yī)學院學報,2019,29(2):48-50.
[18] 賈莉.雙能X線骨密度儀椎體骨密度測定骨質(zhì)疏松癥100例的價值分析[J].影像研究與醫(yī)學應用,2018,2(17):122-123.
[19] 康兵文,肖波,趙明,等.單節(jié)段胸腰段骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折患者PKP術(shù)后臨近椎體骨折的危險因素分析[J].頸腰痛雜志,2019,40(2):242-243.
[20] 中華醫(yī)學會骨質(zhì)疏松和骨礦鹽疾病分會.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮性骨折診療與管理專家共識[J].中華骨質(zhì)疏松和骨礦鹽疾病雜志,2018,11(5):425-437.
[21] 周鐵仁,丁慶剛.經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)對老年骨質(zhì)疏松性胸腰椎壓縮性骨折患者骨密度、Cobb角的影響研究[J].智慧健康,2018,4(11):90-91.
[22] 孫云鋒.骨質(zhì)疏松椎體壓縮性骨折時的骨密度及病理對比研究[J].中國傷殘醫(yī)學,2020,28(9):30-31.
[23] 黃田,鄭南生.單、雙側(cè)入路PKP對胸腰椎壓縮性骨折疼痛感、脊柱功能的影響及安全性分析[J].頸腰痛雜志,2019,40(2):278-279.
(收稿日期:2021-11-17 本文編輯:郭毅曼)

相似文獻/References:

[1]江濤,江林,史俊德,等.動氣針法在踝關(guān)節(jié)骨折術(shù)后中后期康復中的應用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):20.
 JIANG Tao,JIANG Lin,SHI Junde,et al.Application of Dongqi acupuncture(動氣針法)to postoperative rehabilitation in the middle-late period in patients with ankle joint fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):20.
[2]許兵,葉小雨,王蕭楓,等.小管徑經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療 骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體重度壓縮骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[3]王 強.脛腓下聯(lián)合骨牽引配合手法整復小夾板外固定治療 兒童閉合移位性股骨干骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):15.
[4]全先輝,萬春友,劉磊,等.Taylor空間支架外固定治療脛腓骨開放性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[5]袁偉,周曉莉.T形掌指骨微型鋼板內(nèi)固定治療鎖骨近端骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):47.
[6]白晨平.微型鋼板內(nèi)固定治療掌指骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):26.
[7]何 濤.帶尾孔髕骨針聯(lián)合纜索內(nèi)固定系統(tǒng)治療閉合性髕骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):41.
[8]朱彥昭,申成春,蔣麗娜,等.早期手術(shù)修復踝關(guān)節(jié)骨折合并的三角韌帶完全斷裂[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):46.
[9]董正超,姚新苗.髕骨骨折的分型及內(nèi)固定治療進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):58.
[10]李時軍,丁文軍,劉立春.恥骨下支應力性骨折1例[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):74.
[11]彭小東,張曉剛,趙文韜,等.有限元分析在過伸復位治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮性骨折生物力學研究中的應用進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2018,30(07):25.
[12]陳晨,安忠誠,張英健,等.椎體強化術(shù)后殘留腰背痛的研究進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2020,32(05):26.
[13]王寶虎,鄔博來,馬智敏,等.單側(cè)與雙側(cè)椎弓根入路經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體側(cè)方壓縮性骨折的對比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(08):16.
 WANG Baohu,WU Bolai,MA Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of percutaneous kyphoplasty through unipedicular approach versus bipedicular approach for treatment of lateral osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(08):16.
[14]楊晶晶,王威,何承建,等.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)中骨水泥椎間盤滲漏對手術(shù)療效的影響…[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2022,34(01):15.
 YANG Jingjing,WANG Wei,HE Chengjian,et al.Effects of intradiscal bone cement leakage on the clinical outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(08):15.
[15]劉銳,龔德飛,班正濤,等.經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折術(shù)中骨水泥滲漏的危險因素分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2022,34(11):14.
 LIU Rui,GONG Defei,BAN Zhengtao,et al.Risk factors for bone cement leakage during percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2022,34(08):14.
[16]黃志輝,吳釩,李志鋼.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折椎體成形術(shù)后椎體再塌陷的研究進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2023,35(05):37.
[17]高聰,白冰心,盧汪鈺,等.經(jīng)皮椎體強化術(shù)中骨水泥彌散和滲漏的影響因素和干預措施的研究進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2024,36(03):51.
[18]姚敏剛,馬曉飛,孔明祥.單節(jié)段骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)后再骨折的危險因素分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2024,36(12):14.
 YAO Mingang,MA Xiaofei,KONG Mingxiang.Risk factors for refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with mono-segmental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(08):14.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
通訊作者:羅金金 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01