84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]鄧雄偉,萬治平,胡和軍.3D打印技術(shù)輔助經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位空心釘內(nèi)固定治療跟骨骨折…[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2020,32(09):12-17.
 DENG Xiongwei,WAN Zhiping,HU Hejun.Percutaneous leverage reduction and hollow screws internal fixation assisted by 3D printing technology for treatment of calcaneus fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2020,32(09):12-17.
點擊復(fù)制

3D打印技術(shù)輔助經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位空心釘內(nèi)固定治療跟骨骨折…()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第32卷
期數(shù):
2020年09期
頁碼:
12-17
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2020-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Percutaneous leverage reduction and hollow screws internal fixation assisted by 3D printing technology for treatment of calcaneus fractures
作者:
鄧雄偉萬治平胡和軍
(南昌市洪都中醫(yī)院,江西 南昌 330038)
Author(s):
DENG XiongweiWAN ZhipingHU Hejun
Nanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanchang 330038,Jiangxi,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
骨折 跟骨 骨折固定術(shù)內(nèi) 三維打印
Keywords:
fracturesbone calcaneus fracture fixationinternal 3D printing
摘要:
目的:探討3D打印技術(shù)輔助經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位空心釘內(nèi)固定治療跟骨骨折的臨床療效。方法:跟骨骨折患者60例,隨機分為3D打印組和常規(guī)術(shù)式組,每組30例。2組均采用經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位空心釘內(nèi)固定手術(shù)治療。3D打印組,術(shù)前采用3D打印技術(shù)打印患足3D模型,詳細了解骨折情況,制定手術(shù)計劃,確定骨折復(fù)位的撬撥點和螺釘植入位置、方向、長度,并按計劃進行手術(shù)操作。常規(guī)術(shù)式組,按經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位空心釘內(nèi)固定常規(guī)術(shù)式進行手術(shù)操作。記錄2組患者手術(shù)時間、術(shù)中X線透視次數(shù)及骨折愈合時間。分別于術(shù)前、術(shù)后即刻及術(shù)后6個月在X線片上測量患足B?ler角和Gissane角。術(shù)后6個月,參照Maryland足功能評分標準評價療效。結(jié)果:2組患者均順利完成手術(shù),3D打印組與常規(guī)術(shù)式組相比,手術(shù)時間短、術(shù)中透視次數(shù)少[(50.30±7.63)min,(61.47±8.29)min,t=-5.170,P=0.000;(7.03±2.02)次,(12.36±3.15)次,t=-13.493,P=0.000]。2組患者均獲隨訪,隨訪時間6~12個月,中位數(shù)10個月; 骨折均愈合,3D打印組骨折愈合時間較常規(guī)術(shù)式組短[(11.5±1.3)周,(12.5±1.5)周,t=-10.265,P=0.000]。2組患者手術(shù)前后不同時間點間患足B?ler角(3D打印組:6.28°±2.40°,29.50°±2.50°,29.30°±2.65°; 常規(guī)術(shù)式組:6.30°±2.38°,28.60°±2.48°,28.30°±2.30°)、Gissane角(3D打印組:96.30°±4.86°,132.50°±4.68°,132.44°±4.66°; 常規(guī)術(shù)式組:96.50°±4.82°,131.50°±4.60°,131.90°±4.40°)總體比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義,即均存在時間效應(yīng)(F=94.404,P=0.000; F=55.860,P=0.000); 2組患者患足B?ler角、Gissane角組間總體比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計意義,即均不存在分組效應(yīng)(F=1.086,P=0.302; F=5.769,P=0.068); 時間因素和分組因素均無交互效應(yīng)(F=1.686,P=0.190; F=5.026,P=0.072)。術(shù)后6個月參照Maryland足功能評分標準評價療效,3D打印組優(yōu)13例、良12例、可3例、差2例,常規(guī)術(shù)式組優(yōu)10例、良11例、可6例、差3例; 2組患者臨床療效的組間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(Z=-1.101,P=0.271)。結(jié)論:3D打印技術(shù)輔助經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位空心釘內(nèi)固定治療跟骨骨折,與經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位空心釘內(nèi)固定常規(guī)術(shù)式相比,在骨折復(fù)位和患足功能恢復(fù)方面療效相當,但術(shù)中X線透視次數(shù)少、手術(shù)時間短、骨折愈合快。
Abstract:
To explore the clinical curative effects of percutaneous leverage reduction and hollow screws internal fixation assisted by 3D printing technology for treatment of calcaneus fractures.Methods:Sixty patients with calcaneus fractures were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into 3D printing group and conventional surgery group,30 cases in each group.All patients in the 2 groups were treated with percutaneous leverage reduction and hollow screws internal fixation.For patients in 3D printing group,the 3D models of injured feet were printed by using 3D printing technology before the surgery for detailed understanding of fractures,making surgical plan and confirming the leverage point during fracture reduction and the position,direction and length of implanted screws,and then the surgeries were performed according to the designed surgical plan.The patients in conventional surgery group were merely treated with conventional percutaneous leverage reduction and hollow screws internal fixation.The operative time,intraoperative X-ray exposure and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.The B?ler angle and Gissane angle of injured foot were measured on X-ray films before the surgery,immediately after the surgery and at 6 months after the surgery respectively.The clinical curative effects were evaluated according to Maryland foot function scoring standard at 6 months after the surgery.Results:The surgeries were finished successfully in all patients.The operative time was shorter and the intraoperative X-ray exposure was fewer in 3D printing group compared to conventional surgery group(50.30+/-7.63 vs 61.47+/-8.29 min,t=-5.170,P=0.000; 7.03+/-2.02 vs 12.36+/-3.15 times,t=-13.493,P=0.000).All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 6-12 months with a median of 10 months.All fractures healed in the 2 groups,and the fracture healing time was shorter in 3D printing group compared to conventional surgery group(11.5+/-1.3 vs 12.5+/-1.5 weeks,t=-10.265,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in B?ler angle(3D printing group:6.28+/-2.40,29.50+/-2.50,29.30+/-2.65 degrees; conventional surgery group:6.30+/-2.38,28.60+/-2.48,28.30+/-2.30 degrees)and Gissane angle(3D printing group:96.30+/-4.86,132.50+/-4.68,132.44+/-4.66 degrees; conventional surgery group:96.50+/-4.82,131.50+/-4.60,131.90+/-4.40 degrees)of injured foot between different timepoints before and after the surgery,in other words,there was time effect(F=94.404,P=0.000; F=55.860,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in B?ler angle and Gissane angle of injured foot between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was no group effect(F=1.086,P=0.302; F=5.769,P=0.068).There was no interaction between time factor and group factor in B?ler angle and Gissane angle of injured foot(F=1.686,P=0.190; F=5.026,P=0.072).At 6 months after the surgery,the clinical curative effects were evaluated according to Maryland foot function scoring standard.Thirteen patients obtained an excellent result,12 good,3 fair and 2 poor in 3D printing group; while 10 patients obtained an excellent result,11 good,6 fair and 3 poor in conventional surgery group.There was no statistical difference in clinical curative effects between the 2 groups(Z=-1.101,P=0.271).Conclusion:Percutaneous leverage reduction and hollow screws internal fixation assisted by 3D printing technology is similar to conventional percutaneous leverage reduction and hollow screws internal fixation in clinical curative effects on fracture reduction and injuried foot function recovery in treatment of calcaneus fractures,while the former has such advantages as fewer intraoperative X-ray exposure,shorter operative time and faster fracture healing compared to the latter.

參考文獻/References:

[1] 張弢,陳偉,俞光榮,等.隧道撬頂植骨技術(shù)治療關(guān)節(jié)面塌陷型跟骨骨折[J].河北醫(yī)科大學學報,2019,40(12):1477-1478.
[2] CHU C H,CHEN Y Y,LIN K P,et al.Anatomic locking plate for displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture:design and application[J].J Foot Ankle Surg,2017,56(6):1165-1169.
[3] PEZZONI M,SALVI A E,TASSI M,et al.A minimally invasive reduction and synthesis method for calcaneal fractures:the“Brixianbridge” technique[J].J Foot Ankle Surg,2009,48(1):85-88.
[4] PENG Y,LIU J,ZHANG G,et al.Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasivereduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture:a retrospectivestudy[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2019,14(1):124.
[5] DAWID J D,KRISTIAAN S.3D printed tooling for vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding[J].Int J Adv Manuf Technol,2013,64:755-767.
[6] 王春鵬,楊海嬌,張成,等.3D打印技術(shù)在骨科領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用進展[J].醫(yī)學綜述,2020,26(1):118-122.
[7] 吳青松,孫鵬,李立,等.數(shù)字骨科技術(shù)輔助切開復(fù)位內(nèi)固定術(shù)治療跟骨骨折的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):20-23.
[8] 國家中醫(yī)藥管理局.中醫(yī)病證診斷療效標準[M].南京:南京大學出版社,1994:173-174.
[9] 惲曉平.康復(fù)療法評定學[M].北京:華夏出版社,2005:150.
[10] 張英澤,吳文娟,吳昊天.臨床創(chuàng)傷骨科流行病學[M].北京:人民衛(wèi)生出版社2009:455-460.
[11] SANDERS R.Current concepts review-displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000,82(2):225-250.
[12] MOLLOY A P,LIPSCOMBE S J.Hindfoot arthrodesis for management of bone loss following calcaneus fractures and nonunions[J].Foot Ankle Clin,2011,16(1):165-179.
[13] JIANG N,LIN Q R,DIAO X C,et al.Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture:a meta-analysis of current evidence base[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(8):1615-1622.
[14] BRUCE J,SUTHERLAND A.Surgical versus conservative interventions for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013,31(1):CD008628.
[15] 李文祥,施忠民.基于跟骨骨折影像學分析對跟骨矢狀面分區(qū)的研究[J].國際骨科學雜志,2019,40(6):364-368.
[16] LANDSMAN A,MELICK G,PUNDU A.Intra-articular calcaneal fractures:a literature review of atraumatic incisional considerations[J].Clin Podiatr Med Surg,2019,36(2):185-195.
[17] KIEWIET N J,SANGEORZAN B J.Calcaneal fracture management:extensile lateral approach versus small incision technique[J].Foot Ankle Clin,2017,22(1):77-91.
[18] 陳先進,張軍,張道平,等.撬撥復(fù)位雙向空心螺釘內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合植骨治療SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型型跟骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(12):61-64.
[19] 譚新歡,聶偉志,朱育林,等.跟骨骨折微創(chuàng)治療的研究進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(5):73-75.
[20] 徐毅,李海勛,李智豪.跗骨竇切口微創(chuàng)接骨板內(nèi)固定治療SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(8):41-43.
[21] 董福,陸春,朱金榮,等.距下關(guān)節(jié)后側(cè)入路關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助下微創(chuàng)治療跟骨骨折[J].中國修復(fù)重建外科雜志,2017,31(1):36-41.

相似文獻/References:

[1]茆軍,張惠法,嚴培軍,等.Ilizarov外固定支架結(jié)合克氏針固定治療Pilon骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):32.
[2]伍輝國,江克羅,張文正,等.手法復(fù)位杉樹皮小夾板固定治療兒童閉合性指骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):63.
[3]孫群周.組合式外固定器固定結(jié)合有限內(nèi)固定治療 GustiloⅢ型脛骨開放性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):25.
[4]朱旭偉,萬春友,張濤,等.外固定架固定結(jié)合髓腔內(nèi)異體骨支撐治療四肢粉碎性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):68.
[5]楊少輝,許紅霞,邢健昆.正骨伸筋膠囊在膝關(guān)節(jié)周圍骨折術(shù)后康復(fù)中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):43.
[6]林全藝,丁振貝,陳慶運,等.彈性髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定治療兒童四肢長骨干骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):52.
[7]董樂樂,連建強.生物學內(nèi)固定原則在手術(shù)治療長骨骨折不愈合中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(03):73.
[8]王金華,陳建龍,張軍,等.加壓鋼板內(nèi)固定治療兒童脛腓骨開放性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2012,24(12):40.
[9]蘭樹華,黃淑明,鄭榮宗,等.骨皮質(zhì)剝離加植骨治療鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定術(shù)后骨不連、骨延遲愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2012,24(12):46.
[10]閻曉霞.中藥外敷結(jié)合高能體外沖擊波治療骨折延遲愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2012,24(07):56.
[11]譚新歡,畢宏政,聶偉志,等.SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折手法復(fù)位克氏針 內(nèi)固定術(shù)中植骨的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):6.
 TAN Xinhuan,BI Hongzheng,NIE Weizhi,et al.Clinical research on bone grafting after manipulative reduction and kirschner wire internal fixation for treatment of sandersⅡcalcaneal fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):6.
[12]湯樣華,曾林如,辛大偉,等.切開復(fù)位內(nèi)固定治療跟骨后結(jié)節(jié)骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(10):58.
[13]彭亮,劉雙,魏國華,等.距下關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助下經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位內(nèi)固定治療合并糖尿病的跟骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(03):64.
 PENG Liang,LIU Shuang,WEI Guohua,et al.Percutaneous leverage reduction and internal fixation assisted by subtalar arthroscopy for treatment of calcaneal fractures combined with diabetes[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(09):64.
[14]張宇飛,白玉,張高偉,等.跟骨截骨矯形術(shù)治療跟骨骨折畸形愈合的研究進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2022,34(04):51.
[15]沈潤斌,林秀琛,劉文東,等.3D打印導(dǎo)板輔助下克氏針經(jīng)皮撬撥復(fù)位內(nèi)固定治療SandersⅡ型跟骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2023,35(07):76.
[16]陳衛(wèi)東,杜俊鋒,梁林,等.改良弧形跗骨竇切口在跟骨骨折合并腓骨肌腱脫位手術(shù)治療中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2024,36(06):66.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
基金項目:江西省衛(wèi)生計生委科技計劃項目(20194016); 南昌市指導(dǎo)性科技計劃項目(洪科發(fā)計字[2018]39號)
通訊作者:胡和軍 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-20