84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]方國輝,喻勤軍.補(bǔ)腎接骨湯聯(lián)合碳酸鈣D3片口服治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折腎虛血瘀證[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(03):14-19.
 FANG Guohui,YU Qinjun.Oral applications of Bushen Jiegu Tang(補(bǔ)腎接骨湯)and calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets for treatment of kidney-deficiency-blood-stasis-type osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures in aged patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(03):14-19.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

補(bǔ)腎接骨湯聯(lián)合碳酸鈣D3片口服治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折腎虛血瘀證()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第31卷
期數(shù):
2019年03期
頁碼:
14-19
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2019-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Oral applications of Bushen Jiegu Tang(補(bǔ)腎接骨湯)and calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets for treatment of kidney-deficiency-blood-stasis-type osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures in aged patients
作者:
方國輝喻勤軍
(臺州市黃巖區(qū)中醫(yī)院,浙江 臺州 318020)
Author(s):
FANG GuohuiYU Qinjun
Huangyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Taizhou 318020,Zhejiang,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
髖骨折 骨質(zhì)疏松 腎虛 血瘀 補(bǔ)腎接骨湯 碳酸鈣 骨保護(hù)素 核因子κB受體活化因子 轉(zhuǎn)化生長因子β1 堿性磷酸酶 抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶5b 臨床試驗(yàn)
Keywords:
hip fractures osteoporosis kidney deficiency blood stasis Bushen Jiegu Tang calcium carbonate osteoprotegerin receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B transforming growth factor beta1 alkaline phosphatase tartrate resistant acid phosphatase 5b clinical trial
摘要:
目的:觀察補(bǔ)腎接骨湯聯(lián)合碳酸鈣D3片口服治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折腎虛血瘀證的臨床療效,并探討其作用機(jī)制。方法:將107例老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)內(nèi)固定術(shù)后腎虛血瘀證患者隨機(jī)分為2組。55例采用補(bǔ)腎接骨湯聯(lián)合碳酸鈣D3片口服治療(聯(lián)合組),52例采用碳酸鈣D3片口服治療(碳酸鈣D3片組)。補(bǔ)腎接骨湯水煎服,每日1劑,連續(xù)服用12周; 碳酸鈣D3片口服,每日1片,連續(xù)服用12周。記錄并比較2組患者的骨折愈合時間、髖部疼痛視覺模擬量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)評分,并分別于治療前、治療結(jié)束后比較2組患者骨保護(hù)素(osteoprotegerin,OPG)、核因子-κB受體活化因子配體(receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand,RANKL)、轉(zhuǎn)化生長因子(transforming growth factor,TGF)-β1、骨堿性磷酸酶(bone alkaline phosphatase,BALP)及抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶5b(tartrate resistant acid phosphatase 5b,TRACP5b)血清含量。結(jié)果:①骨折愈合時間。聯(lián)合組患者骨折愈合時間短于碳酸鈣D3片組[(7.85±1.28)周,(8.73±1.18)周,t=3.692,P=0.000)]。②髖部疼痛VAS評分。時間因素和分組因素存在交互效應(yīng)(F=37.953,P=0.000); 2組患者髖部疼痛VAS評分總體比較,組間差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義,即存在分組效應(yīng)(F=4.269,P=0.000); 治療前后不同時間點(diǎn)髖部疼痛VAS評分的差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義,即存在時間效應(yīng)(F=13.274,P=0.000); 2組患者髖部疼痛VAS評分隨時間均呈下降趨勢,且2組的下降趨勢不完全一致[聯(lián)合組:(7.31±1.25)分,(4.13±0.83)分,(2.15±0.58)分,F=5.271,P=0.000; 碳酸鈣D3片組:(7.46±1.02)分,(5.08±0.96)分,(2.76±0.42)分,F=3.985,P=0.000]; 治療開始后1周2組患者髖部疼痛VAS評分比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(t=0.678,P=0.499); 治療開始后3周、5周聯(lián)合組髖部疼痛VAS評分均低于碳酸鈣D3片組(t=5.485,P=0.000; t=6.201,P=0.000)。③骨愈合相關(guān)指標(biāo)。治療前2組患者OPG、RANKL、TGF-β1血清含量比較,組間差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(t=0.253,P=0.800; t=0.352,P=0.726; t=1.345,P=0.181); 治療結(jié)束后2組患者OPG、RANKL、TGF-β1血清含量均高于治療前[OPG:(4.12±0.84)pmol·L-1,(8.57±1.33)pmol·L-1,t=20.980,P=0.000;(4.08±0.79)pmol·L-1,(7.16±1.25)pmol·L-1,t=15.020,P=0.000。RANKL:(14.63±3.37)nmol·L-1,(32.59±10.95)nmol·L-1,t=11.626,P=0.000;(14.85±3.10)nmol·L-1,(41.93±12.15)nmol·L-1,t=16.016,P=0.000。TGF-β1:(227.53±41.28)μg·L-1,(380.58±35.66)μg·L-1,t=20.807,P=0.000;(237.93±38.52)μg·L-1,(312.74±37.51)μg·L-1,t=10.034,P=0.000],聯(lián)合組患者OPG、TGF-β1血清含量均高于碳酸鈣D3片組(t=5.643,P=0.000; t=9.591,P=0.000),RANKL血清含量低于碳酸鈣D3片組(t=4.169,P=0.000)。④骨代謝相關(guān)指標(biāo)。治療前2組患者BALP、TRACP5b血清含量比較,組間差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(t=1.170,P=0.245; t=1.750,P=0.083); 治療結(jié)束后2組患者BALP血清含量均高于治療前[聯(lián)合組:(57.48±4.19)單位·L-1,(78.43±3.52)單位·L-1,t=28.392,P=0.000; 碳酸鈣D3片組:(56.43±5.07)單位·L-1,(65.39±4.85)單位·L-1,t=9.289,P=0.000],TRACP5b血清含量均低于治療前[聯(lián)合組:(7.02±0.47)單位·L-1,(4.28±0.30)單位·L-1,t=35.715,P=0.000; 碳酸鈣D3片組:(6.84±0.59)單位·L-1,(5.11±0.43)單位·L-1,t=17.088,P=0.000],聯(lián)合組患者BALP血清含量高于碳酸鈣D3片組(t=15.980,P=0.000),TRACP5b血清含量低于碳酸鈣D3片組(t=11.632,P=0.000)。結(jié)論:補(bǔ)腎接骨湯聯(lián)合碳酸鈣D3片口服可有效縮短老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折腎虛血瘀證患者的骨折愈合時間,減輕患者術(shù)后疼痛,其作用機(jī)制可能與其改善骨代謝、促進(jìn)成骨細(xì)胞活化以及抑制破骨細(xì)胞過度活化有關(guān)。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical curative effects of oral application of Bushen Jiegu Tang(補(bǔ)腎接骨湯,BSJGT)and calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets for treatment of kidney-deficiency-blood-stasis-type osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures in aged patients and to explore its mechanism of action.Methods:One hundred and seven aged patients who suffered from kidney-deficiency-blood-stasis syndrome after proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fracture were randomly divided into 2 groups.Fifty-five patients were treated with oral application of BSJGT and calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets(combination therapy group),while the others were treated with oral application of calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets(monotherapy group).The BSJGT decoctions were taken one dose a day for consecutive 12 weeks.The calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets were taken one tablet a day for consecutive 12 weeks.The fracture healing time and hip pain visual analogue scale(VAS)scores were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.The serum contents of osteoprotegerin(OPG),receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand(RANKL),transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1),bone alkaline phosphatase(BALP)and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase 5b(TRACP5b)were detected and compared between the 2 groups before the treatment and after the end of the treatment respectively.Results:The fracture healing time was shorter in combination therapy group compared to monotherapy group(7.85+/-1.28 vs 8.73+/-1.18 weeks,t=3.692,P=0.000).There was interaction between time factor and group factor in hip pain VAS scores(F=37.953,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in hip pain VAS scores between the 2 groups in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=4.269,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in hip pain VAS scores between different timepoints before and after the treatment,in other words,there was time effect(F=13.274,P=0.000).The hip pain VAS scores presented a time-dependent decreasing trend in both of the 2 groups,while the 2 groups were inconsistent with each other in the decreasing trend of hip pain VAS scores(combination therapy group:7.31+/-1.25,4.13+/-0.83,2.15+/-0.58 points,F=5.271,P=0.000; monotherapy group:7.46+/-1.02,5.08+/-0.96,2.76+/-0.42 points,F=3.985,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in hip pain VAS scores between the 2 groups at 1 week after the beginning of the treatment(t=0.678,P=0.499).The hip pain VAS scores were lower in combination therapy group compared to monotherapy group at 3 and 5 weeks after the beginning of the treatment(t=5.485,P=0.000; t=6.201,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in serum contents of OPG,RANKL and TGF-β1 between the 2 groups before the treatment(t=0.253,P=0.800; t=0.352,P=0.726; t=1.345,P=0.181).The serum contents of OPG,RANKL and TGF-β1 were higher after the end of the treatment compared to pre-treatment in the 2 groups(OPG:4.12+/-0.84 vs 8.57+/-1.33 pmol/L,t=20.980,P=0.000; 4.08+/-0.79 vs 7.16+/-1.25 pmol/L,t=15.020,P=0.000.RANKL:14.63+/-3.37 vs 32.59+/-10.95 nmol/L,t=11.626,P=0.000; 14.85+/-3.10 vs 41.93+/-12.15 nmol/L,t=16.016,P=0.000.TGF-β1:227.53+/-41.28 vs 380.58+/-35.66 μg/L,t=20.807,P=0.000; 237.93+/-38.52 vs 312.74+/-37.51 μg/L,t=10.034,P=0.000).The serum contents of OPG and TGF-β1 were higher and the serum content of RANKL was lower in combination therapy group compared to monotherapy group(t=5.643,P=0.000; t=9.591,P=0.000; t=4.169,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in serum contents of BALP and TRACP5b between the 2 groups before the treatment(t=1.170,P=0.245; t=1.750,P=0.083).The serum content of BALP was higher and the serum content of TRACP5b was lower after the end of the treatment compared to pre-treatment in the 2 groups(combination therapy group:57.48+/-4.19 vs 78.43+/-3.52 unit/L,t=28.392,P=0.000; 7.02+/-0.47 vs 4.28+/-0.30 unit/L,t=35.715,P=0.000; monotherapy group:56.43+/-5.07 vs 65.39+/-4.85 unit/L,t=9.289,P=0.000; 6.84+/-0.59 vs 5.11+/-0.43 unit/L,t=17.088,P=0.000).The serum content of BALP was higher and the serum content of TRACP5b was lower in combination therapy group compared to monotherapy group(t=15.980,P=0.000; t=11.632,P=0.000).Conclusion:Oral application of BSJGT and calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablet can effectively shorten fracture healing time and relieve postoperative pain in aged patients with kidney-deficiency-blood-stasis-type osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures,and its mechanisms of action may be that it can improve bone metabolism,promote osteoblast activation and inhibit osteoclast overactivation.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] 柯新,孫亭方.兩種內(nèi)固定治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨粗隆骨折后對TGF-β2表達(dá)的影響及療效比較[J].生物骨科材料與臨床研究,2017,14(2):52-54. [2] 鄒澤良.甲狀旁腺激素聯(lián)合葛根素對老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨粗隆骨折術(shù)后影響的臨床觀察[J].中國骨質(zhì)疏松雜志,2017,23(8):1081-1085. [3] 張牧龍.通脈湯對老年股骨粗隆間骨折內(nèi)固定治療髖關(guān)節(jié)功能及骨密度影響[J].實(shí)用中醫(yī)藥雜志,2017,33(5):466-467. [4] 胥少汀,葛寶豐,徐印坎.實(shí)用骨科學(xué)[M].3版.北京:人民軍醫(yī)出版社,2005:1737-1745. [5] 中華中醫(yī)藥學(xué)會.中醫(yī)骨傷科常見病診療指南[M].北京:中國中醫(yī)藥出版社,2012:154-157. [6] 張智海,劉忠厚,李娜,等.中國人骨質(zhì)疏松癥診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)專家共識[J].中國骨質(zhì)疏松雜志,2014,20(9):1007-1010. [7] 鄭筱萸.中藥新藥臨床研究指導(dǎo)原則(試行)[M].北京:中國醫(yī)藥科技出版社,2002:85-86. [8] 王志,湯健,華興一.InterTan髓內(nèi)釘與股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘治療老年性股骨粗隆間骨折的Meta分析[J].安徽醫(yī)學(xué),2018,39(2):136-140. [9] 張建洛,張飛.股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘聯(lián)合中藥治療高齡股骨粗隆骨折臨床研究[J].河南中醫(yī),2016,36(8):1399-1401. [10] 何星宏.中醫(yī)正骨手法復(fù)位外固定與西醫(yī)手術(shù)內(nèi)固定治療老年股骨粗隆間骨折的療效比較[J].現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志,2014,23(22):2431-2433. [11] 鄧智剛.PFNA、DHS在治療高齡患者股骨粗隆骨折中的應(yīng)用[J].臨床醫(yī)學(xué)工程,2013,20(1):55-56. [12] 鐘敏,楊斌,曾明,等.探究關(guān)節(jié)置換法治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨粗隆骨折患者臨床療效[J].中國傷殘醫(yī)學(xué),2017,25(13):34-36. [13] 屈平義.辨證分期內(nèi)外用藥配合治療不穩(wěn)定型股骨粗隆間骨折臨床研究[J].陜西中醫(yī),2017,38(7):926-927. [14] 李江山,張志強(qiáng).溫腎逐瘀壯骨湯結(jié)合股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定治療股骨粗隆間骨折42例[J].河北中醫(yī),2015,37(2):222-223. [15] 弓永順,萬超,徐毅.甲狀旁腺激素聯(lián)合低頻脈沖電磁場治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨粗隆骨折的臨床療效觀察[J].中國骨質(zhì)疏松雜志,2018,24(1):1-4. [16] 蔡麗萍,傅紅飛,湯海燕,等.低分子肝素鈣結(jié)合早期康復(fù)干預(yù)預(yù)防股骨粗隆間骨折內(nèi)固定術(shù)后深靜脈血栓的效果[J].中國生化藥物雜志,2017,37(2):216-219. [17] 胡剛曉,王擁軍.自擬愈骨湯聯(lián)合手術(shù)治療老年股骨粗隆間骨折的療效觀察[J].中國中醫(yī)藥科技,2017,24(1):98-100. [18] 肖捷,付小軍,余海平,等.PFNA微創(chuàng)治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨粗隆骨折[J].浙江創(chuàng)傷外科,2016,21(2):337-339. [19] 董根榮,陳龍,何斌,等.加味桃紅四物湯對老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)圍手術(shù)期隱性失血的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(9):12-14. [20] 梁偉春,黎清斌,勞永鏘,等.通脈湯對老年股骨粗隆間骨折患者圍術(shù)期PLT、PAgR、D-D和TEG的影響[J].中成藥,2018,40(1):61-65. [21] 陸洲,孫奇,裘曉冬,等.無牽引床仰臥位不擴(kuò)髓與擴(kuò)髓股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定治療老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折的比較研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(9):15-18.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]溫超海,何忠,李永斌,等.閉合復(fù)位伽瑪釘改良成鎖定支架內(nèi)固定治療 老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):32.
[2]孫群周,阮成群,李光明,等.股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定治療 老年不穩(wěn)定型股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):20.
[3]方策,倪新宇,王宏偉,等.遲氏正骨手法復(fù)位單臂外固定支架固定治療 老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):22.
[4]劉磊,萬春友,全先輝,等.鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定結(jié)合肱骨頭植骨重建治療 肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):52.
[5]趙云昌.人工股骨頭置換治療老年粉碎性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):31.
[6]姜自偉,黃楓,鄭曉輝,等.老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折患者的圍手術(shù)期風(fēng)險評估與控制[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):33.
[7]倪新宇,方策.外固定器治療股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折的研究進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):48.
[8]徐偉鋒,葉健,吳連國.強(qiáng)骨飲對骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨頸骨折患者全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后 血清骨代謝生化指標(biāo)和骨密度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):12.
 XU Weifeng,YE Jian,WU Lianguo.Effect of Qianggu Yin(強(qiáng)骨飲,QGY)on serum bone metabolism indexes and bone density after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):12.
[9]張明強(qiáng).生物型加長柄半髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)治療 高齡不穩(wěn)定股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折療效觀察[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):56.
[10]李書良,李啟義,李建明,等.鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合自體髂骨植骨治療 股骨近端粉碎性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):31.
[11]龔江浩.股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘聯(lián)合抗骨質(zhì)疏松藥物治療 不穩(wěn)定型老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折的臨床觀察[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(04):29.
 GONG Jianghao.A combination therapy of proximal femoral nail antirotation and anti-osteoporotic drugs for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):29.
[12]費(fèi)國芳,費(fèi)紅良,王金法.兩種內(nèi)固定方法治療老年不穩(wěn)定性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折的對比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(05):9.
 FEI Guofang,FEI Hongliang,WANG Jinfa.Comparison of two kinds of internal fixation for treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(03):9.
[13]劉悅,鐘輝,戴蓉丹,等.骨折聯(lián)絡(luò)服務(wù)模式防治老年髖部脆性骨折的研究進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(05):40.
 LIU Yue,ZHONG Hui,DAI Rongdan,et al.Advancement of research on fracture liaison service model for prevention and treatment of fragility hip fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(03):40.
[14]柳松,張德祥.老年股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折患者股骨近端防旋髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)后頸干角丟失的影響因素分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2023,35(11):5.
 LIU Song,ZHANG Dexiang.Analysis of factors influencing the loss of collodiaphyseal angle after internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(03):5.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2018-11-08 本文編輯:時紅磊)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-30