84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]何國(guó)忠,應(yīng)永生,俞春生,等.前路與后路一期病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定 治療胸腰椎結(jié)核的Meta分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2018,30(08):29-35.
 HE Guozhong,YING Yongsheng,YU Chunsheng,et al.Primary debridement combined with bone grafting and internal fixation through anterior approach versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis:a meta analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(08):29-35.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

前路與后路一期病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定 治療胸腰椎結(jié)核的Meta分析()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期數(shù):
2018年08期
頁(yè)碼:
29-35
欄目:
文獻(xiàn)研究
出版日期:
2018-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Primary debridement combined with bone grafting and internal fixation through anterior approach versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis:a meta analysis
作者:
何國(guó)忠1應(yīng)永生1俞春生1劉丙根2
1.浙江省永康市骨科醫(yī)院,浙江 永康 321300; 2.浙江省寧波市第二醫(yī)院,浙江 寧波 315010
Author(s):
HE Guozhong1YING Yongsheng1YU Chunsheng1LIU Binggen2
1.Yongkang Orthopedic Hospital,Yongkang 321300,Zhejiang,China 2.The Second Hospital of Ningbo City,Ningbo 315010,Zhejiang,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
結(jié)核脊柱 胸椎 腰椎 手術(shù)入路 清創(chuàng)術(shù) 骨移植 Meta分析 系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)
Keywords:
tuberculosisspinal thoracic vertebrae lumbar vertebrae operative approach debridement bone transplantation Meta-analysis systematic review
摘要:
比較前路與后路一期病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定治療胸腰椎結(jié)核的臨床療效和安全性。方法:應(yīng)用計(jì)算機(jī)檢索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Ovid、Spinger Link、Elsevier、CNKI、萬(wàn)方建庫(kù)至2017年7月國(guó)內(nèi)外公開(kāi)發(fā)表的前路一期病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定(前路組)與后路一期病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定(后路組)治療胸腰椎結(jié)核的隨機(jī)對(duì)照研究、前瞻性或回顧性隊(duì)列研究文獻(xiàn)。由2名研究者獨(dú)立篩選文獻(xiàn)并提取資料,采用紐卡斯?fàn)?渥太華量表(the Newcastle Ottawa Scale,NOS)進(jìn)行文獻(xiàn)方法學(xué)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)后,采用RevMan5.0軟件進(jìn)行Meta分析。結(jié)果:最初檢出2794篇相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),經(jīng)篩選最終納入13篇文獻(xiàn),其中英文文獻(xiàn)6篇、中文文獻(xiàn)7篇; 6篇文獻(xiàn)為前瞻性隊(duì)列研究文獻(xiàn),6篇為回顧性隊(duì)列研究文獻(xiàn),1篇為隨機(jī)對(duì)照研究文獻(xiàn); 8篇文獻(xiàn)NOS評(píng)價(jià)分?jǐn)?shù)為8分,5篇文獻(xiàn)為7分; 共涉及1190例患者,其中前路組576例、后路組614例。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,2組手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量、住院時(shí)間、末次隨訪時(shí)脊柱后凸Cobb角丟失度數(shù)比較,組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[WMD=-2.08,95%CI(-39.59,35.43); WMD=-35.50,95%CI(-103.16,32.16); WMD=0.69,95%CI(-2.06,3.43); WMD=0.15,95%CI(-0.44,0.73)]; 前路組的脊柱后凸Cobb角矯正角度明顯小于后路組[WMD=-2.14,95%CI(-3.22,-1.06)],植骨融合時(shí)間短于后路組[WMD=-0.21,95%CI(-0.35,-0.07)],并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率高于后路組[OR=1.67,95%CI(1.02,2.72)]。結(jié)論:與前路一期病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定相比,后路一期病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定治療胸腰椎結(jié)核,能更好地矯正脊柱后凸畸形,且并發(fā)癥少,但其植骨融合時(shí)間比前路手術(shù)長(zhǎng)。
Abstract:
To investigate the curative effect and safety of primary debridement combined with bone grafting and internal fixation through anterior approach versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis.Methods:All the randomized controlled trial(RCT)articles,prospective cohort study articles and retrospective cohort study articles about primary debridement combined with bone grafting and internal fixation through anterior approach(anterior approach group)versus posterior approach(posterior approach group)for treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis that published at home and abroad included from database establishing to July 2017 were retrieved from Cochrane Library,Pubmed,Ovid,Spinger Link,Elsevier,China national knowledge internet and WanFang Data through computer.The articles were screened and the information was extracted independently by two searchers.The methodological quality of research in the articles was evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale(NOS)and a Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software.Results:Two thousand seven hundred and ninety-four articles were searched out.After screening,13 articles(6 English articles and 7 Chinese articles)were included in the final analysis,including 6 prospective cohort study articles,6 retrospective cohort study articles and 1 RCT article,576 patients in anterior approach group and 614 patients in posterior approach group,and the NOS scores were 8 points in 8 articles and 7 points in 5 articles.The results of Meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no statistical difference in operative time,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay and loss of spinal kyphotic Cobb's angle at last follow-up between the 2 groups(WMD=-2.08,95%CI(-39.59,35.43); WMD=-35.50,95%CI(-103.16,32.16); WMD=0.69,95%CI(-2.06,3.43); WMD=0.15,95%CI(-0.44,0.73)).The correction degree of spinal kyphotic Cobb's angle was smaller,the time of bone graft fusion was shorter and the postoperative complication incidences were higher in anterior approach group compared to posterior approach group((WMD=-2.14,95%CI(-3.22,-1.06); WMD=-0.21,95%CI(-0.35,-0.07); OR=1.67,95%CI(1.02,2.72)).Conclusion:Primary debridement combined with bone grafting and internal fixation through posterior approach can better correct the kyphotic deformity compared to primary debridement combined with bone grafting and internal fixation through anterior approach in treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis,and it has less postoperative complications.However,the former needs longer bone graft fusion time compared to the latter.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] NAGASHIMA HYK.Recent trends in spinal infections:retrospe-ctive analysis of patients treated during the past 50 years[J].Int Orthop,2010,34(3):395-399.
[2] RASOULI MR,MIRKOOHI M,VACCARO AR,et al.Spinal tuberculosis:diagnosis and management[J].Asian Spine J,2012,6(4):294-308.
[3] JIN D,QU D,CHEN J,et al.One-stage anterior interbody autografting and instrumentation in primary surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis[J].Eur Spine J,2004,13(2):114-121.
[4] HIRAKAWA A,MIYAMOTO K,MASUDA T,et al.Surgical outcome of 2-stage(posterior and anterior)surgical treatment using spinal instrumentation for tuberculous spondylitis[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2010,23(2):133-138.
[5] HARIMAYA K,LENKE LG,SON-HING JP,et al.Safety and accuracy of pedicle screws and constructs placed in infantile and juvenile patients[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2011,36(20):1645-1651.
[6] ZHANG HQ,LI JS,GUO CF,et al.Two-stage surgical management using posterior instrumentation,anterior debridement and allografting for tuberculosis of the lower lumbar spine in children of elementary school age:minimum 3-year follow-up of 14 patients[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2012,132(9):1273-1279.
[7] 蔡希強(qiáng),董偉杰.前路固定與后路固定治療脊柱結(jié)核的矯形及神經(jīng)康復(fù)效果研究[J].中國(guó)當(dāng)代醫(yī)藥,2013,20(14):11-13.
中醫(yī)正骨2018年8月第30卷第8期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2018,Vol.30,No.8(總595)
(總596)中醫(yī)正骨2018年8月第30卷第8期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2018,Vol.30,No.8
[8] GARG B,KANDWAL P,NAGARAJA UB,et al.Anterior versus posterior procedure for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis[J].Indian J Orthop,2012,46(2):165-170.
[9] MA YZ,CUI X,LI HW,et al.Outcomes of anterior and posterior instrumentation under different surgical procedures for treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis in adults[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(2):299-305.
[10] PU X,ZHOU Q,HE Q,et al.A posterior versus anterior surgical approach in combination with debridement, interbody autografting and instrumentation for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(2):307-313.
[11] ZHANG HQ,LI JS,ZHAO SS,et al.Surgical management for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in the elderly:posterior only versus combined posterior and anterior approaches[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2012,132(12):1717-1723.
[12] ZHONG W,XIONG G,WANG B,et al.Surgical management for thoracic spinal tuberculosis posterior only versus anterior video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J].PLoS One,2015,10(3):119759.
[13] 周樹(shù)根,陳少慧,溫干軍.脊柱結(jié)核前后路不同術(shù)式的選擇及療效分析[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)藥科學(xué),2014,4(5):201-203.
[14] 周焯家,簡(jiǎn)月奎,李波,等.腰骶椎結(jié)核治療的方法選擇(附65例分析)[J].中國(guó)矯形外科雜志,2008,16(15):1141-1143.
[15] 崔旭,馬遠(yuǎn)征,陳興,等.脊柱結(jié)核前后路不同術(shù)式的選擇及其療效[J].中國(guó)脊柱脊髓雜志,2011,21(10):807-812.
[16] 崔旭,馬遠(yuǎn)征,李宏偉,等.前路和后路內(nèi)固定治療胸腰椎結(jié)核的療效比較[J].中華醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2012,92(19):1325-1329.
[17] 滿益旺,唐接福,唐永太,等.前、后路內(nèi)固定手術(shù)治療胸腰段脊柱結(jié)核的對(duì)比研究[J].中國(guó)當(dāng)代醫(yī)藥,2012,19(3):42-43.
[18] 田黎明,劉曉紅,王利新,等.前后路不同術(shù)式治療脊柱結(jié)核的安全性及療效對(duì)比[J].吉林醫(yī)學(xué),2017,38(3):421-424.
[19] LEE SH,SUNG JK,PARK YM.Single-stage transpedicular decompression and posterior instrumentation in treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis:a retrospective case series[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2006,19(8):595-602.
[20] WELLS GA, SHEA B,PETERSON J,et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS)for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies inmeta analyses[J].Accessed,2011,30,785.
[21] JAIN AK.Tuberculosis of the spine a fresh look at an old disease[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2010,92(7):905-913.
[22] WANG Z,GE Z,JIN W,et al.Treatment of spinal tuberculosis with ultrashort-course chemotherapy in conjunction with partial excision of pathologic vertebrae[J].Spine J,2007,7(6):671-681.
[23] BENLI T, ACAROGˇLU E, AKALIN S,et al.Anterior radical debridement and anterior instrumentation in tuberculosis spondylitis[J].Eur Spine J,2003,12(2):224-234.
[24] ZHANG HQ,LIN MZ,SHEN KY,et al.Surgical management for multilevel noncontiguous thoracic spinal tuberculosis by single-stage posterior transforaminal thoracic debridement,limited decompression,interbody fusion,and posterior instrumentation(modified TTIF)[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2012,132(6):751-757.
[25] LI J,LÜ GH,WANG B,et al.Pedicle screw implantation in the thoracic and lumbar spine of 1-4-year-old children:evaluating the safety and accuracy by a computer tomography follow-up[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2013,26(2):46-52.
[26] LUK KDK.Commentary:instrumentation in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis,anterior or posterior?[J].Spine J,2011,11(8):734-736.
[27] YANG P,HE X,LI H,et al.Clinical efficacy of posterior versus anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis in adults:a meta-analysis[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2015,9(1):10.
[28] 阿巴斯·艾麥提,買爾旦·買買提,盛偉斌.一期病灶清除植骨前路與后路途徑治療脊柱結(jié)核療效比較的Meta分析[J].中國(guó)循證醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2015,15(11):1293-1300.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]徐幫杰,楊楠,白偉杰,等.坐位定點(diǎn)旋轉(zhuǎn)整復(fù)法治療腰椎間盤(pán)突出癥的療效觀察[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):17.
 XU Bangjie,YANG Nan,BAI Weijie,et al.Observation on the curative effect of fixed-point rotational reduction in sitting position in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(08):17.
[2]江建春.神經(jīng)根型頸椎病的中醫(yī)藥治療研究概況[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):71.
[3]錢濟(jì)先,高浩然,李存孝,等.后路經(jīng)皮椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合前路病灶清除植骨融合術(shù)治療胸腰椎結(jié)核脊柱后凸畸形[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(03):33.
[4]費(fèi)駿,賴震,石仕元,等.經(jīng)肋橫突入路病灶清除植骨加后路椎弓根內(nèi)固定治療進(jìn)展性胸椎結(jié)核[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(06):58.
[5]張志強(qiáng),劉國(guó)泰,劉杰,等.施氏整頸三步九法治療頸性眩暈[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(07):39.
[6]盧中道,楊勇,梅偉,等.一期前路病灶清除植骨內(nèi)固定治療胸腰椎結(jié)核[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(07):71.
[7]龔星軍,馬文央,王倩芬.牽引配合經(jīng)筋推拿治療頸椎間盤(pán)突出癥的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2011,23(03):16.
 GONG Xing-jun*,MA Wen-yang,WANG Qian-fen.*.Clinical study on the treatment of cervical disc herniation through the method of traction combined with muscle meridian manipulation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2011,23(08):16.
[8]高仰來(lái).從手法角度探討頸椎病分型的新方法[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2011,23(04):43.
[9]宋永偉.應(yīng)用孫氏旋提手法治療神經(jīng)根型頸椎病[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2011,23(04):67.
[10]宋永偉,鄧文濤.三階段治筋正骨綜合療法治療 復(fù)發(fā)性腰椎間盤(pán)突出癥12例[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2011,23(06):61.
[11]郭小偉,梅偉,潘玉林,等.一期后路病灶清除納米仿生骨椎體支撐體植骨融合 內(nèi)固定治療胸腰椎結(jié)核[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):66.
[12]胡金平,費(fèi)駿,羅赟,等.經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡下病灶清除持續(xù)灌洗治療腰椎結(jié)核[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(10):60.
[13]呂振超,丁锏,曹向陽(yáng),等.后路病灶清除脊柱短縮融合內(nèi)固定術(shù)治療胸腰椎結(jié)核骨缺損[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2018,30(06):74.
[14]楊輝,王偉彤,丁龍,等.一期后路脊椎切除鈦網(wǎng)植骨融合內(nèi)固定治療活動(dòng)期胸腰椎結(jié)核[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(05):50.
 YANG Hui,WANG Weitong,DING Long,et al.Primary posterior vertebral column resection combined with titanium mesh bone graft fusion and internal fixation for treatment of active thoracolumbar tuberculosis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(08):50.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
通訊作者:劉丙根 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-31