84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]郝連升,王新昌,陳健,等.微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮鋼板內(nèi)固定與切開復位內(nèi)固定治療閉合性脛骨遠端骨折的對比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(10):14-17，23.
　HAO Liansheng,WANG Xinchang,CHEN Jian,et al.A retrospective trial of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation for treatment of closed distal tibial fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(10):14-17，23.
點擊復制

微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮鋼板內(nèi)固定與切開復位內(nèi)固定治療閉合性脛骨遠端骨折的對比研究()
分享到：

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第28卷
期數(shù):
2016年10期
頁碼:
14-17，23
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2016-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A retrospective trial of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation for treatment of closed distal tibial fractures
作者:
郝連升; 王新昌; 陳健; 黃峰
山東省聊城市中醫(yī)醫(yī)院,山東 聊城 252000
Author(s):
HAO Liansheng; WANG Xinchang; CHEN Jian; HUANG Feng
Liaocheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Liaocheng 252000,Shandong,China
關鍵詞:
脛骨骨折;  骨折; 閉合性;  外科手術; 微創(chuàng)性;  骨折固定術; 內(nèi);  療效比較研究
Keywords:
tibial fractures;  fractures; closed;  surgical procedures; minimally invasive;  fracture fixation; internal;  comparative effectiveness research
摘要:
目的:比較微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮鋼板內(nèi)固定(minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis,MIPPO)與切開復位內(nèi)固定治療閉合性脛骨遠端骨折的臨床療效及安全性。方法:回顧性分析82例閉合性脛骨遠端骨折患者的病例資料,其中47例采用MIPPO治療、35例采用切開復位內(nèi)固定治療。男67例,女15例。年齡19～67歲,中位數(shù)39歲。左側31例,右側51例。根據(jù)骨折AO分型,A型61例、B型13例、C型8例。合并腓骨骨折69例,其中腓骨中上1/3骨折23例、中下1/3骨折46例。受傷至手術時間1～5 d,中位數(shù)3 d。比較2組患者的手術時間、切口長度、術中出血量、術后1 d疼痛數(shù)字分級評分、骨折愈合時間及術后16個月的Baird-Jackson踝關節(jié)功能評分,并觀察并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況。結果:所有患者均獲得了16個月的隨訪。2組患者的手術時間比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義[(46.83±2.14)min,(50.76±1.38)min,t=1.761,P=0.953]; MIPPO組的切口長度、術中出血量、骨折愈合時間、疼痛數(shù)字分級評分及Baird-Jackson踝關節(jié)功能評分均優(yōu)于切開復位內(nèi)固定組[(8.15±1.02)cm,(23.65±2.46)cm,t=2.794,P=0.031;(80.32±10.09)mL,(253.76±27.12)mL,t=3.642,P=0.025;(80.32±10.09)d,(119.32±7.13)d,t=2.014,P=0.039;(2.19±0.72)分,(5.74±1.46)分,t=2.173,P=0.041;(96.83±2.14)分,(80.76±1.38)分,t=2.592,P=0.025]。MIPPO組4例骨折延遲愈合,未出現(xiàn)切口感染及鋼板外露等并發(fā)癥。切開復位內(nèi)固定組2例術后9個月骨折未愈合,行髂骨植骨鋼板內(nèi)固定術; 2例發(fā)生切口感染,清創(chuàng)換藥后愈合; 1例發(fā)生鋼板外露及切口感染,清創(chuàng)、抗感染治療后行皮瓣轉移術。2組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=0.221,P=0.638)。結論:MIPPO治療閉合性脛骨遠端骨折,手術時間及安全性與切開復位內(nèi)固定相當,但其具有切口小、術中出血量少、術后疼痛輕、骨折愈合時間短、踝關節(jié)功能恢復好等優(yōu)點,值得臨床推廣應用。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO)versus open reduction internal fixation(ORIF)in the treatment of closed distal tibial fractures.Methods:The medical records of 82 patients with closed distal tibial fractures were analyzed retrospectively.Forty-seven patients were treated with MIPPO(MIPPO group),while the others were treated with open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF group).The patients consisted of 67 males and 15 females,and ranged in age from 19 to 67 years(Median=39 yrs).The fractures located in left tibia for 31 patients and right tibia for 51 patients.According to the AO classification of fracture,the tibial fractures belonged to types A(61),B(13)and C(8).Tibial fractures combined with fibular fractures were found in 69 patients,and the fibular fractures were located at top third of fibula in 23 patients and bottom third of fibula in 46 patients.The patients ranged in disease course from 1 to 5 days(Median=3 days).The operative time,incision length,blood loss,pain numerical rating scale(NRS)score at 1 day after surgery,fracture healing time and Baird-Jackson ankle function scores at 16 months after surgery and complication incidences were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups.Results:All patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 16 months.There was no statistical difference in the operative time between the 2 groups(46.83+/-2.14 vs 50.76+/-1.38 min,t=1.761,P=0.953).The MIPPO group surpassed the ORIF group in incision length,blood loss,fracture healing time,pain NRS scores and Baird-Jackson ankle function scores(8.15+/-1.02 vs 23.65+/-2.46 cm,t=2.794,P=0.031; 80.32+/-10.09 vs 253.76+/-27.12 mL,t=3.642,P=0.025; 80.32+/-10.09 vs 119.32+/-7.13 d,t=2.014,P=0.039; 2.19+/-0.72 vs 5.74+/-1.46 points,t=2.173,P=0.041; 96.83+/-2.14 vs 80.76+/-1.38 points,t=2.592,P=0.025).The delayed union of fractures were found in 4 patients and no complication such as incision infection and plate exposure were found in MIPPO group; while non-union of fractures(2),incision infection(2)and plate exposure combined with incision infection(1)were found in ORIF group.There was no statistical difference in complication incidences between the two groups(χ2=0.221,P=0.638).Conclusion:MIPPO is similar to ORIF in operative time and safety in treatment of closed distal tibial fractures,while the former has the advantages of smaller incision,less intraoperative blood loss,less postoperative pain,shorter fracture healing time and better ankle functional recovery,so it is worthy of popularizing in clinic.

參考文獻/References:

[1] Park J,Yang KH.Treatment of an open distal tibia fracture with segmental bone loss in combination with a closed proximal tibia fracture:a case report[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2012,132(8):1121-1124.
[2] 黃培鎮(zhèn),黃學員,楊達文,等.微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮內(nèi)固定在脛骨遠端關節(jié)外骨折的運用[J].中國中醫(yī)骨傷科雜志,2015,23(2):51-52.
[3] Rüedi TP,Buckley RE,Moran CG.骨折治療的AO原則[M].2版.危杰,劉璠,吳新寶,等譯.上海:上海科學技術出版社,2010:624-625.
[4] Baird RA,Jackson ST.Fracture of the distal part of the fibular with associated disruption of the deltoid ligament.Treatment without repair of the deltoid ligament[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1987,69(9):1346-1352.
[5] Manuel P,Natalio C,Leonardo L,et al.Minimally-invasive alternatives in the treatment of distal articular tibial fractures[J].Fuß & Sprunggelenk,2012,10(1):37-45.
[6] 武政,劉向棟,周煜虎,等.微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮鎖定加壓鋼板內(nèi)固定術治療脛骨遠端骨折療效觀察[J].現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結合雜志,2015,24(7):736-738.
[7] 唐巖,邢宏,田野,等.鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定治療脛骨遠端骨折[J].中國骨與關節(jié)損傷雜志,2011,26(2):181-182.
[8] 張浩,申國慶,高發(fā)旺,等.MIPPO技術在脛骨遠端骨折手術治療中的應用[J].中國骨與關節(jié)損傷雜志,2013,28(4):374-375.
[9] 王薪華,孫根發(fā),趙煒,等.微創(chuàng)經(jīng)皮鋼板技術治療脛骨復雜骨折的臨床研究[J].實用骨科雜志,2015,21(1):84-85.
[10] 陳細明,蔡樹輝,吳育鋒,等.手法復位經(jīng)皮解剖型鎖定鋼板外固定治療鎖骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(7):28-29.
[11] 張一鳴,張學民,陸洲.經(jīng)皮解剖型鎖定鋼板固定治療脛骨遠端骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(2):47-48.
[12] 董福慧.“微創(chuàng)”骨傷科技術的制高點[J].中國骨傷,2006,19(1):1-2.
[13] Shin YW,Sung YB,Choi JY,et al.Analysis of risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture in adult[J].J Korean Fract Soc,2011,24(4):313-320.
[14] 潘治軍,楊濤,思玉樓,等.280例骨不連病例原因分析[J].中國骨傷,2013,26(4):284-286.
[15] 韋旭明,孫振中,姜為民,等.前外側和內(nèi)側經(jīng)皮接骨板治療脛骨遠端骨折的對比研究[J].中國中醫(yī)骨傷科雜志,2015,23(12):29-33.
[16] 潘奇華.脛骨平臺骨折常規(guī)治療聯(lián)合中藥干預的療效觀察[J].浙江中醫(yī)藥大學學報,2014,38(2):167-169.
[17] 鄧紅敏.閉合復位脛骨遠端內(nèi)側低切跡鎖定加壓鋼板治療脛骨遠端骨折[J].中國中醫(yī)骨傷科雜志,2015,23(11):52-54.
[18] 方略,陳建列,黃曉濤,等.清熱解毒法及補益氣血法在防治骨折圍手術期感染中的相關研究[J].中國中醫(yī)骨傷科雜志,2015,23(3):78-80.

相似文獻/References:

[1]江濤,江林,史俊德,等.動氣針法在踝關節(jié)骨折術后中后期康復中的應用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):20.
　JIANG Tao,JIANG Lin,SHI Junde,et al.Application of Dongqi acupuncture(動氣針法)to postoperative rehabilitation in the middle-late period in patients with ankle joint fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):20.
[2]許兵,葉小雨,王蕭楓,等.小管徑經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術治療 骨質疏松性椎體重度壓縮骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[3]肖善富,張喜善,于鳳珍.髕下小切口鋼絲紐扣式內(nèi)固定治療脛骨髁間隆突骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):34.
[4]葛波涌,王玉波,王明太,等.交鎖髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定治療脛骨干骨折的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):8.
　GE Boyong,WANG Yubo,WANG Mingtai,et al.Clinical study on the internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):8.
[5]王 強.脛腓下聯(lián)合骨牽引配合手法整復小夾板外固定治療 兒童閉合移位性股骨干骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):15.
[6]袁偉,周曉莉.T形掌指骨微型鋼板內(nèi)固定治療鎖骨近端骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):47.
[7]何 濤.有限切開植骨鋼板內(nèi)固定治療 SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型脛骨平臺骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):22.
[8]何忠,黃宗權,王強,等.脛骨中下段螺旋形骨折合并后踝裂紋骨折的診治體會[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):28.
[9]白晨平.微型鋼板內(nèi)固定治療掌指骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):26.
[10]何 濤.帶尾孔髕骨針聯(lián)合纜索內(nèi)固定系統(tǒng)治療閉合性髕骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):41.
[11]全先輝,萬春友,劉磊,等.Taylor空間支架外固定治療脛腓骨開放性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):30.
[12]陳利軍,田野,劉文剛,等.非典型膝關節(jié)外傷后脛骨近端隱匿性骨折的影像診斷[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):26.
[13]武富良,柴占京,李振龍.3種固定方法治療開放性脛骨骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):46.
[14]趙春棟,周松,高開拓.傷科消腫湯口服聯(lián)合甘露醇靜脈滴注治療脛腓骨骨折術后肢體腫脹的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(12):21.
　ZHAO Chundong,ZHOU Song,GAO Kaituo.Clinical study on oral application of Shangke Xiaozhong Tang(傷科消腫湯)combined with intravenous drip infusion of mannitol for treatment of postoperative limb swelling in patients with peroneotibial fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(10):21.
[15]計忠宇,于鴻,馬紅茹,等.長腿石膏固定治療兒童脛腓骨骨折865例[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(12):67.
[16]于東方.鎖定鋼板外固定治療脛骨開放性骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(07):66.
[17]曹曦,崔偉,路通.脛骨骨折骨不連的原因分析及治療進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(08):50.
[18]盛紅楓,張培祥,張魁,等.益腎活血方口服治療脛骨下段骨折術后骨折不愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(11):60.
[19]張偉業(yè),萬春友,張濤,等.外固定器軸向載荷分擔比測試在Taylor空間支架外固定治療脛腓骨開放性骨折中的應用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(10):21.
　ZHANG Weiye,WAN Chunyou,ZHANG Tao,et al.Application of axial load sharing ratio test on external fixator to the surgery of Taylor spatial frame external fixation for treatment of open tibiofibular fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2019,31(10):21.
[20]王珺琛,曹湘予,楊玉山,等.Ilizarov骨搬移技術治療脛腓骨開放性骨折脛骨大段骨缺損[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(10):55.

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-20