84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]徐無忌,劉曉嵐.體位復(fù)位結(jié)合經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)與經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的對(duì)比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(07):20-24.
 XU Wuji,LIU Xiaolan.Effect of Qianggu Yin(強(qiáng)骨飲,QGY)on bone microstructure in the ovariectomized osteoporosis rats[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(07):20-24.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

體位復(fù)位結(jié)合經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)與經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的對(duì)比研究()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第28卷
期數(shù):
2016年07期
頁碼:
20-24
欄目:
胸腰椎骨折
出版日期:
2016-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Qianggu Yin(強(qiáng)骨飲,QGY)on bone microstructure in the ovariectomized osteoporosis rats
作者:
徐無忌劉曉嵐
湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)第二附屬醫(yī)院,湖南 長(zhǎng)沙 410005
Author(s):
XU WujiLIU Xiaolan
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changsha 410005,Hunan,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
脊柱骨折 骨質(zhì)疏松性骨折 骨折壓縮性 正骨手法 椎體成形術(shù) 椎體后凸成形術(shù) 臨床試驗(yàn)
Keywords:
spinal fractures osteoporotic fractures fracturescompression bone setting manipulation vertebroplasty kyphoplasty clinical trail
摘要:
目的:比較體位復(fù)位結(jié)合經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)與經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的臨床療效及安全性。方法:2009年1月至2014年1月收治175例骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折患者,其中82例采用體位復(fù)位結(jié)合PVP治療(聯(lián)合治療組),93例采用PKP治療(PKP組)。比較2組患者的手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中透視次數(shù)、住院時(shí)間、治療費(fèi)用、疼痛視覺模擬量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)評(píng)分、Cobb's角、鄰近椎體骨折發(fā)生率和骨水泥滲漏率。結(jié)果:聯(lián)合治療組的手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中透視次數(shù)、治療費(fèi)用均低于PKP組[(30.134±7.503)min,(55.215±12.781)min,t=-16.046,P=0.000;(15.610±1.322)次,(20.366±3.653)次,t=-11.716,P=0.000;(15 078.146±1 149.556)元,(31 659.765±1 662.886)元,t=-77.440,P=0.000]; 2組患者的住院時(shí)間比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(4.549±1.167)d,(4.580±0.889)d,t=-0.205,P=0.838]; 術(shù)前及術(shù)后1個(gè)月2組患者的疼痛VAS評(píng)分、Cobb's角比較,組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(7.524±0.946)分,(7.441±1.272)分,t=0.487,P=0.627;(0.829±0.379)分,(0.817±0.388)分,t=0.207,P=0.836; 20.195°±3.802°,19.828°±3.479°,t=0.667,P=0.506; 5.354°±1.828°,4.882°±1.276°,t=1.995,P=0.053],且術(shù)后1個(gè)月時(shí)2組患者的疼痛VAS評(píng)分和Cobb's角均較術(shù)前減小(t=62.030,P=0.000; t=49.081,P=0.000; t=33.665,P=0.000; t=40.132,P=0.000)。至術(shù)后12個(gè)月時(shí)聯(lián)合治療組發(fā)生鄰近椎體骨折8例,PKP組發(fā)生鄰近椎體骨折11例,2組患者的鄰近椎體骨折發(fā)生率比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=0.193,P=0.660); 聯(lián)合治療組19椎發(fā)生骨水泥滲漏,PKP組16椎發(fā)生骨水泥滲漏,2組患者的骨水泥滲漏發(fā)生率比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=0.934,P=0.334)。結(jié)論:體位復(fù)位結(jié)合PVP手術(shù)與單純PKP手術(shù)均可有效緩解骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折患者的疼痛癥狀、恢復(fù)傷椎形態(tài),二者的療效及安全性相當(dāng),但前者具有手術(shù)時(shí)間短、術(shù)中透視次數(shù)少及治療費(fèi)用低的優(yōu)勢(shì)。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effect and safety between postural reduction combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)and percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Methods:One hundred and seventy-five patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were recruited from January 2009 to January 2014.Eighty-two patients(combination treatment group)were treated with postural reduction combined with PVP,while the others(PKP group)were treated with PKP.The operative time,intraoperative X-ray exposure,hospital stay,cost of treatment,pain visual analogue scale(VAS)scores,Cobb's angle and incidence rate of adjacent vertebral fractures and bone cement leakage were compared between the 2 groups.Results:The operative time,intraoperative X-ray exposure and cost of treatment were less in combination treatment group compared to PKP group(30.134+/-7.503 vs 55.215+/-12.781 min,t=-16.046,P=0.000; 15.610+/-1.322 vs 20.366+/-3.653 times,t=-11.716,P=0.000; 15 078.146+/-1 149.556 vs 31 659.765+/-1 662.886 RMB,t=-77.440,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in hospital stay between the 2 groups(4.549+/-1.167 vs 4.580+/-0.889 days,t=-0.205,P=0.838).There was no statistical difference in pain VAS scores and Cobb's angle between the 2 groups before surgery and at 1 month after the surgery(7.524+/-0.946 vs 7.441+/-1.272 points,t=0.487,P=0.627; 0.829+/-0.379 vs 0.817+/-0.388 points,t=0.207,P=0.836; 20.195+/-3.802 vs 19.828+/-3.479 degrees,t=0.667,P=0.506; 5.354+/-1.828 vs 4.882+/-1.276 degrees,t=1.995,P=0.053).The pain VAS scores and Cobb's angle decreased in both of the 2 groups at 1 month after the surgery compared to pre-surgery(t=62.030,P=0.000; t=49.081,P=0.000; t=33.665,P=0.000; t=40.132,P=0.000).The adjacent vertebral fractures were found in combination treatment group(8)and PKP group(11)at 12 month after the surgery,and there was no statistical difference in the incidence rate of adjacent vertebral fractures between the 2 groups(χ2=0.193,P=0.660).The bone cement leakage were found in combination treatment group(19)and PKP group(16),and there was no statistical difference in the incidence rate of bone cement leakage between the 2 groups(χ2=0.934,P=0.334).Conclusion:Both combination thearpy of postural reduction and PVP and monotherapy of PKP can effectively relieve the pain and restore the morphous of injured vertebrae in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.They are similar to each other in curative effect and safety,however,the former has such advantages as shorter operative time,less intraoperative X-ray exposure and lower cost of treatment.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] Galibert P,Deramond H,Rosat P,et al.Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty[J].Neurochirurgie,1987,33(2):166-168. [2] 徐寶山,胡永成,閏廣輝,等.經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)和后凸成形術(shù)的相關(guān)問題探討[J].中華骨科雜志,2009,29(5):430-435. [3] 王彥偉.PVP結(jié)合手法正脊與PKP治療椎體壓縮性骨折臨床比較[J].吉林醫(yī)學(xué),2012,33(9):1849-1850. [4] 國家中醫(yī)藥管理局.中醫(yī)病證診斷療效標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[M].南京:南京大學(xué)出版社,1994:176. [5] 全仁夫,倪月明,鄭宣,等.經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)后骨折椎體生物力學(xué)性能和組織形態(tài)研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(12):15-19. [6] Chen C,Li D,Wang Z,et al.Safety and efficacy studies of vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty,and mesh-container-plasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures:preliminary report[J].PLoS One,2016,11(3):e0151492. [7] 何升華,馬篤軍,余偉吉,等.過伸牽引彈性按壓法聯(lián)合經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性胸腰椎壓縮骨折的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(3):25-29. [8] 范國鑫,扶青松,顧廣飛,等.脊柱微創(chuàng)手術(shù)的輻射危害及其防護(hù)進(jìn)展[J].中國脊柱脊髓雜志,2014,24(3):275-278. [9] Yang LY,Wang XL,Zhou L,et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of unilateral versus bilateral kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].Pain Physician,2013,16(4):277-290. [10] Huang Z,Wan S,Ning L,et al.Is unilateral kyphoplasty as effective and safe as bilateral kyphoplasties for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures?A meta-analysis[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2014,472(9):2833-2842. [11] 張永平,王國平,廖旭昱,等.單側(cè)入路經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療多椎體骨質(zhì)疏松性壓縮骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2012,24(4):52-53. [12] 李慶龍,吳愛憫,倪文飛,等.經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體骨折的常見并發(fā)癥分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(3):40-43. [13] 鄭毓嵩,張勇,林金丁,等.椎體成形術(shù)骨水泥滲漏的相關(guān)危險(xiǎn)因素分析[J].中華創(chuàng)傷雜志,2015,31(4):312-316. [14] 方宜宥,周輝,彭亮,等.經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)中骨水泥滲漏的原因與預(yù)防策略[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(4):69-70.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]許兵,葉小雨,王蕭楓,等.小管徑經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療 骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體重度壓縮骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[2]張亮,張莉,王莉佳,等.快速康復(fù)外科理念在椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定治療 胸腰椎骨折圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):75.
[3]謝小利,李曉程.經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體 壓縮骨折的圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):79.
[4]郭世明,石玲玲,郭志民,等.手法復(fù)位石膏外固定和切開復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定治療 骨質(zhì)疏松性橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的比較研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(04):15.
 GUO Shiming,SHI Lingling,GUO Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(07):15.
[5]孫蘭芬,王龍強(qiáng),劉潤(rùn)宏,等.頸椎骨折脫位合并脊髓損傷截癱患者的圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(03):79.
[6]李格,梅偉,劉沛霖,等.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)后鄰近椎體再骨折的危險(xiǎn)因素探討[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(06):18.
 LI Ge,MEI Wei,LIU Peilin,et al.Investigation on risk factors for adjacent vertebral refractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(07):18.
[7]梅 偉.胸腰椎骨折臨床診療中的熱點(diǎn)問題[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(07):1.
[8]李英周,葉鋒,王曉,等.后路撬撥植骨椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定治療胸腰椎骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(07):46.
[9]王軍,陳哲,王碩凡.胸腰椎骨折椎體植骨材料的臨床應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(07):64.
[10]張旭橋,王曉暉,黃光明,等.生骨膠囊在經(jīng)皮椎體強(qiáng)化術(shù)治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性胸腰椎骨折中的應(yīng)用研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(11):21.
 ZHANG Xuqiao,WANG Xiaohui,HUANG Guangming,et al.Application of Shenggu Jiaonang(生骨膠囊)to the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in the aged who received percutaneous vertebral augmentation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(07):21.
[11]林鵬,金濤,史科學(xué),等.經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)聯(lián)合補(bǔ)腎活血湯口服治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折腎虛血瘀證[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(11):72.
[12]梁博程,史曉林,施振宇,等.強(qiáng)骨膏方對(duì)絕經(jīng)后骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體骨折患者經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)后骨代謝及生活質(zhì)量的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2020,32(05):6.
 LIANG Bocheng,SHI Xiaolin,SHI Zhenyu,et al.Influence of Qianggu(強(qiáng)骨)paste on bone metabolism and life quality of patients who received percutaneous kyphoplasty for postmenopausal osteoporotic vertebral fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2020,32(07):6.
[13]羅佳佳,祁建華,楊斐,等.椎體成形術(shù)后新發(fā)椎體壓縮性骨折的影響因素[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2022,34(06):42.
[14]張會(huì),鄢衛(wèi)平,劉衛(wèi)義,等.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折椎體強(qiáng)化術(shù)后殘余腰背痛的影響因素分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2024,36(08):31.
 ZHANG Hui,YAN Weiping,LIU Weiyi,et al.Factors influencing residual low back pain after vertebral augmentation for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(07):31.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
2016-04-18收稿 2016-05-26修回
徐無忌 E-mail:[email protected]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01