84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]王仲鋒,王曉,李國軍,等.3種不同固定方式治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端C型骨折的療效比較[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(07):14-19.
 WANG Zhongfeng,WANG Xiao,LI Guojun,et al.Advancement of clinical application of vertebral bone graft material to treatment of thoracolumbar fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(07):14-19.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

3種不同固定方式治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端C型骨折的療效比較()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第28卷
期數(shù):
2016年07期
頁碼:
14-19
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2016-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Advancement of clinical application of vertebral bone graft material to treatment of thoracolumbar fractures
作者:
王仲鋒王曉李國軍張淞劉洋
河南大學(xué)淮河醫(yī)院,河南 開封 475000
Author(s):
WANG ZhongfengWANG XiaoLI GuojunZHANG SongLIU Yang
Huaihe Hospital of Henan University,Kaifeng 475000,Henan,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
橈骨骨折 橈腕關(guān)節(jié) 骨折固定術(shù)
Keywords:
radius fractures wrist joint fracture fixation
摘要:
目的:比較T形鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定、T形鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合外固定架外固定及萬向雙柱鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端C型骨折的臨床療效。方法:回顧性分析2008年1月至2015年1月手術(shù)治療的100例橈骨遠(yuǎn)端C型骨折患者的病例資料,男43例、女57例; 年齡20~75歲,中位數(shù)46歲,左側(cè)48例,右側(cè)52例。采用T形鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定35例,采用T形鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合外固定架外固定33例,采用萬向雙柱鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定32例。對(duì)比3組患者的骨折愈合情況、患肢腕關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度(背伸、掌屈、橈偏、尺偏)、患側(cè)手握力、掌傾角、尺偏角、橈骨短縮長度及采用腕關(guān)節(jié)功能(patient-rated wrist evaluation,PRWE)評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)評(píng)價(jià)的腕關(guān)節(jié)功能。結(jié)果:100例患者均獲隨訪,隨訪時(shí)間12~36個(gè)月,中位數(shù)24個(gè)月; 骨折均愈合,愈合時(shí)間12~22周,中位數(shù)16周。術(shù)后12個(gè)月,3組腕關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度(背伸、掌屈、橈偏、尺偏)、患側(cè)手握力(占健側(cè)百分比)、掌傾角、尺偏角、橈骨短縮長度和PRWE評(píng)分的組間差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(58.3°±5.7°),(62.9°±6.6°),(63.6°±7.5°),F=6.299,P=0.003;(60.3°±6.8°),(68.1°±6.8°),(69.2°±7.7°),F=6.635,P=0.002;(16.3°±1.9°),(20.3°±2.4°),(19.8°±2.3°),F=34.365,P=0.000;(20.8°±2.7°),(23.4°±4.0°),(24.4°±2.6°),F=11.605,P=0.000;(70.4±2.7)%,(84.2±4.2)%,(84.3±4.3)%,F=65.652,P=0.000;(8.2°±1.8°),(9.9°±2.1°),(10.0°±1.8°),F=10.120,P=0.000;(13.7°±2.9°),(18.6°±3.6°),(19.8°±2.3°),F=40.137,P=0.000;(3.2±0.9)mm,(2.4±0.9)mm,(2.6±0.9)mm,F=7.516,P=0.000;(6.3±1.2)分,(8.0±0.9)分,(7.6±0.9)分,F=27.196,P=0.000]。與T形鎖定鋼板聯(lián)合外固定支架組和萬向雙柱鎖定鋼板組相比,T形鎖定鋼板組腕關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度和患側(cè)手握力較差、掌傾角和尺偏角較小、橈骨短縮程度較大、PRWE評(píng)分均較低(P=0.005,P=0.007,P=0.000,P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.002,P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.006); 而萬向雙柱鎖定鋼板組與T形鎖定鋼板聯(lián)合外固定支架組比較,各指標(biāo)的組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.691,P=0.513,P=0.401,P=0.202,P=0.922,P=0.114,P=0.897,P=0.105,P=0.388)。結(jié)論:與T形鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定相比,T形鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合外固定架外固定和萬向雙柱鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端C型骨折,能更好地維持骨折端的穩(wěn)定,更有利于腕關(guān)節(jié)功能的恢復(fù)。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical curative effects of T-shape locking plate internal fixation versus T-shape locking plate internal fixation combined with external fixator external fixation versus universal double rods locking plate internal fixation in treatment of type C distal radius fractures.Methods:The medical records of 100 patients with type C distal radius fractures who received surgery from January 2008 to January 2015 were analyzed retrospectively.The patients consisted of 43 males and 57 females,and ranged in age from 20 to 75 years(Median=46 yrs).The fractures located in left radius for 48 patients and right radius for 52 patients.Thirty-five patients were treated with T-shape locking plate internal fixation(group A),and 33 patients were treated with T-shape locking plate internal fixation combined with external fixator external fixation(group B),while 32 patients were treated with universal double rods locking plate internal fixation(group C).The fracture healing,range of motion(ROM)of wrist(dorsal expansion,palmar flexion,radial deviation and ulnar deviation),hand grip strength of affected side,volar tilt angles,radial inclination angles,radial shortening length and wrist function were compared between the 3 groups.The wrist function were evaluated by using patient-rated wrist evaluation(PRWE)scoring standard.Results:All patients in the 3 groups were followed up for 12-36 months with a median of 24 months and all fractures healed for 12-22 weeks with a median of 16 weeks.There was statistical difference in wrist ROM(dorsal expansion,palmar flexion,radial deviation and ulnar deviation),hand grip strength of affected side,volar tilt angles,radial inclination angles,radial shortening length and PRWE scores between the 3 groups at 12 months after surgery(58.3+/-5.7,62.9+/-6.6,63.6+/-7.5 degrees,F=6.299,P=0.003; 60.3+/-6.8,68.1+/-6.8,69.2+/-7.7 degrees,F=6.635,P=0.002; 16.3+/-1.9,20.3+/-2.4,19.8+/-2.3 degrees,F=34.365,P=0.000; 20.8+/-2.7,23.4+/-4.0,24.4+/-2.6 degrees,F=11.605,P=0.000; 70.4+/-2.7,84.2+/-4.2,84.3+/-4.3%,F=65.652,P=0.000; 8.2+/-1.8,9.9+/-2.1,10.0+/-1.8 degrees,F=10.120,P=0.000; 13.7+/-2.9,18.6+/-3.6,19.8+/-2.3 degrees,F=40.137,P=0.000; 3.2+/-0.9,2.4+/-0.9,2.6+/-0.9 mm,F=7.516,P=0.000; 6.3+/-1.2,8.0+/-0.9,7.6+/-0.9 points,F=27.196,P=0.000).The wrist ROM,hand grip strength of affected side,volar tilt angles and radial inclination angles were smaller,and the radial shortening degrees were larger and PRWE scores were lower in group A compared to group B and group C(P=0.005,P=0.007,P=0.000,P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.002,P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.006).There was no statistical difference in all indexs between group B and group C(P=0.691,P=0.513,P=0.401,P=0.202,P=0.922,P=0.114,P=0.897,P=0.105,P=0.388).Conclusion:T-shape locking plate internal fixation combined with external fixator external fixation and universal double rods locking plate internal fixation can better maintain the stability of broken ends of fractured bone and be more conducive to the recovery of wrist function compared to T-shape locking plate internal fixation in the treatment of type C distal radius fractures.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] 李建峰,趙民,趙亮,等.萬向鎖定加壓掌側(cè)雙柱接骨板治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端不穩(wěn)定性骨折[J].臨床骨科雜志,2012,15(5):559-560. [2] 田偉.積水潭實(shí)用骨科學(xué)[M].北京:人民衛(wèi)生出版社,2008. [3] Macdermid JC,Turgeon T,Richards RS,et al.Patient rating of wrist pain and disability:a reliable and valid measurement tool[J].J Orthop Trauma,1999,12(8):577-586. [4] Han LR,Jin CX,Yan J,et al.Effectiveness of external fixator combined with T-plate internal fixation for the treatment of comminuted distal radius fractures[J].Genet Mol Res,2015,14(1):2912-2919. [5] Ayong S,Traore A,Postlethwaite D,et al.Functional evaluation of unstable distal radius fractures treated with an angle-stable volar T-plate[J].Acta Orthop Belg,2014,80(2):183-189. [6] 郭雅娣,閔捷,李峻,等.單一鎖定加壓鋼板掌側(cè)入路治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折[J].中華手外科雜志,2014,30(3):235-236. [7] Gu WL,Wang J,Li DQ,et al.Bridging external fixation versus non-bridging external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Orthop Sci,2016,21(1):24-31. [8] Natoli RM,Baer MR,Bednar MS.Conversion of external fixation to open reduction and internal fixation for complex distal radius fractures[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2016,102(3):339-343. [9] Chilakamary VK,Lakkireddy M,Koppolu KK,et al.Osteosynthesis in distal radius fractures with conventional bridging external fixator; Tips and tricks for getting them right[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2016,10(1):RC05-RC08. [10] Fakoor M,Fakoor M,Mohammadhoseini P.Displaced Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal Radius:Open Reduction With Internal Fixation Versus Bridging External Fixation[J].Trauma Mon,2015,20(3):e17631. [11] 樊金全,范大禮,周躍.前臂外固定支架結(jié)合“T”形鋼板內(nèi)固定治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折[J].中華創(chuàng)傷雜志,2010,26(3):242-243. [12] Williksen JH,Husby T,Hellund JC,et al.External fixation and adjuvant Pins versus volar locking plate fixation in unstable distal radius fractures:a randomized,controlled study with a 5-Year Follow-Up[J].J Hand Surg Am,2015,40(7):1333-1340. [13] 葛鴻慶,陳文治,王君鰲,等.掌側(cè)雙柱萬向鎖定加壓接骨板治療C型橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折37例[J].中華創(chuàng)傷雜志,2014,30(11):1141-1143. [14] 張宇軒,謝仁國,許亞軍,等.萬向雙柱鎖定接骨板與T型鎖定接骨板治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折療效的比較[J].中華手外科雜志,2015,31(1):13-16. [15] 朱良運(yùn).T型鎖定接骨板和萬向雙柱鎖定接骨板對(duì)橈骨遠(yuǎn)端外傷性C型骨折的療效對(duì)比分析[J].解放軍醫(yī)藥雜志,2015,27(12):95-98. [16] 白曉冬,王寶軍,趙亮,等.遠(yuǎn)端萬向鎖定加壓雙柱接骨板治療橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折[J].中華創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志,2015,17(9):815-818.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]陳紅衛(wèi),王子陽,李軍,等.肘關(guān)節(jié)后外側(cè)入路聯(lián)合前內(nèi)側(cè)入路治療 肘關(guān)節(jié)恐怖三聯(lián)征[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):40.
[2]袁榮霞,董霞,趙純,等.改良折頂手法復(fù)位小夾板固定治療兒童尺橈骨遠(yuǎn)端雙骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):18.
[3]翟利鋒,陳億民,許樺,等.經(jīng)指伸肌劈開入路治療MasonⅡ型橈骨頭骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):59.
[4]王俊頎.骨折整復(fù)變通手法運(yùn)用舉隅[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(04):72.
[5]鄭軍,辛宗山,操儒道,等.小夾板外固定對(duì)不同類型Colles骨折固定效果的對(duì)比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(04):25.
 ZHENG Jun,XIN Zongshan,CAO Rudao,et al.Comparative study on the fixation effects of small splint external fixation in treatment of different types of Colles fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(07):25.
[6]徐毅,李海勛,李智豪.2.4 mm萬向掌側(cè)雙柱鎖定加壓接骨板內(nèi)固定治療老年橈骨遠(yuǎn)端不穩(wěn)定骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(09):66.
[7]胡和軍,吳法強(qiáng),鄧雄偉,等.骨皮質(zhì)切剝術(shù)聯(lián)合生龍接骨膠囊口服治療四肢長骨干骨折不愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(10):64.
[8]王廣偉,霍力為,庾偉中,等.手法復(fù)位夾板外固定治療兒童前臂骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(12):52.
[9]謝心軍,王星喜,張雄,等.手法復(fù)位定制杉樹皮夾板外固定治療兒童尺橈骨雙骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(03):73.
[10]劉亞非,李興華,王冰.肘關(guān)節(jié)外側(cè)入路固定聯(lián)合分時(shí)康復(fù)干預(yù)治療肘關(guān)節(jié)三聯(lián)征[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(09):61.
[11]曾武,林曙峰,朱俊峰,等.女性骨質(zhì)疏松性橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定術(shù)后腕關(guān)節(jié)功能恢復(fù)的影響因素分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(08):39.
 ZENG Wu,LIN Shufeng,ZHU Junfeng,et al.Analysis of factors influencing wrist function recovery after locking plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures in female[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(07):39.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
2016-04-29收稿 2016-06-05修回
王曉 E-mail:[email protected]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01