84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]李存祥,李德思,張學(xué)波,等.膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎患者腓骨小段截骨術(shù)后步態(tài)參數(shù)特征分析[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2023,35(03):25-30.
　LI Cunxiang,LI Desi,ZHANG Xuebo,et al.An analysis of characteristics of gait parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis after small segmental fibular osteotomy[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2023,35(03):25-30.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎患者腓骨小段截骨術(shù)后步態(tài)參數(shù)特征分析()
分享到：

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第35卷
期數(shù):
2023年03期
頁(yè)碼:
25-30
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2023-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
An analysis of characteristics of gait parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis after small segmental fibular osteotomy
作者:
李存祥1; 李德思2; 張學(xué)波3; 降文豪3
(1.河北省寧晉縣醫(yī)院,河北 寧晉 055550; 2.河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)第三醫(yī)院,河北 石家莊 050051; 3.河北省寧晉縣中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)院,河北 寧晉 055550)
Author(s):
LI Cunxiang1; LI Desi2; ZHANG Xuebo3; JIANG Wenhao3
1.Ningjin County Hospital,Ningjin 055550,Hebei,China 2.The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050021,Hebei,China 3.Ningjin County Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Ningjin 055550,Hebei,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
骨關(guān)節(jié)炎; 膝;  截骨術(shù);  腓骨;  步態(tài)分析
Keywords:
osteoarthritis; knee;  osteotomy;  fibula;  gait analysis
摘要:
目的:分析膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)患者腓骨小段截骨術(shù)后步態(tài)參數(shù)特征。方法:納入46例采用腓骨小段截骨術(shù)治療的KOA患者。男18例,女28例。年齡58～72歲,中位數(shù)65歲。分別于術(shù)前及術(shù)后3個(gè)月、1年、3年、5年采用IDEEA3穿戴式智能化步態(tài)分析儀采集患者步態(tài)參數(shù),分析患者的步態(tài)參數(shù)特征。結(jié)果:6例患者退出隨訪(fǎng),最終納入40例患者進(jìn)行步態(tài)參數(shù)特征分析。①患肢支撐時(shí)間。不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)的患肢支撐時(shí)間呈先上升后下降趨勢(shì)[(421.02±90.49)ms,(449.04±72.02)ms,(477.34±136.40)ms,(488.31±57.99)ms,(432.26±45.18)ms,F=9.672,P=0.000]。術(shù)后3個(gè)月、1年、3年,患肢支撐時(shí)間均長(zhǎng)于術(shù)前(P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.000); 術(shù)后5年,患肢支撐時(shí)間短于術(shù)后1年、3年(P=0.020,P=0.000),但與術(shù)前、術(shù)后3個(gè)月比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.394,P=0.098); 術(shù)后1年、3年,患肢支撐時(shí)間均長(zhǎng)于術(shù)后3個(gè)月(P=0.047,P=0.000); 術(shù)后3年,患肢支撐時(shí)間與術(shù)后1年比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.553)。②肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間和患側(cè)單步時(shí)間。不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)的肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間、患側(cè)單步時(shí)間均呈下降趨勢(shì)[(461.78±72.53)ms,(432.24±53.78)ms,(430.97±46.98)ms,(402.71±28.27)ms,(411.01±42.78)ms,F=8.521,P=0.000;(700.44±162.84)ms,(615.03±94.18)ms,(588.90±71.76)ms,(551.88±49.91)ms,(566.18±38.20)ms,F=22.102,P=0.000]。術(shù)后3個(gè)月、1年、3年、5年,肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間、患側(cè)單步時(shí)間均短于術(shù)前(P=0.037,P=0.018,P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000); 術(shù)后1年、3年、5年,患側(cè)單步時(shí)間均短于術(shù)后3個(gè)月(P=0.036,P=0.000,P=0.005); 術(shù)后1年、5年,肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間與術(shù)后3個(gè)月比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.892,P=0.084); 術(shù)后3年,肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間短于術(shù)后3個(gè)月(P=0.008); 術(shù)后3年,肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間、患側(cè)單步時(shí)間均短于術(shù)后1年(P=0.004,P=0.005); 術(shù)后5年,肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間、患側(cè)單步時(shí)間與術(shù)后1年、3年比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.060,P=0.281; P=0.086,P=0.152)。③步速、步頻、步長(zhǎng)、步幅。不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)的步速、步頻、步長(zhǎng)、步幅均呈上升趨勢(shì)[(41.19±15.71)m·min-1,(48.92±13.15)m·min-1,(56.04±15.50)m·min-1,(61.89±13.15)m·min-1,(58.33±10.66)m·min-1,F=19.652,P=0.000;(90.10±16.17)步·min-1,(99.83±12.17)步·min-1,(104.09±11.20)步·min-1,(110.44±8.89)步·min-1,(107.59±7.24)步·min-1,F=26.333,P=0.000;(0.45±0.11)m,(0.49±0.10)m,(0.53±0.10)m,(0.57±0.09)m,(0.56±0.08)m,F=14.302,P=0.000;(0.87±0.24)m,(0.97±0.20)m,(1.05±0.18)m,(1.12±0.17)m,(1.09±0.16)m,F=15.307,P=0.000]。術(shù)后3個(gè)月、1年、3年、5年,步速均快于術(shù)前(P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000); 術(shù)后1年、3年、5年,步速均快于術(shù)后3個(gè)月(P=0.003,P=0.000,P=0.000); 術(shù)后3年,步速快于術(shù)后1年(P=0.013); 術(shù)后5年,步速與術(shù)后1年、3年比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.495,P=0.215)。術(shù)后3個(gè)月、1年、3年、5年,步頻均高于術(shù)前(P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000); 術(shù)后1年、3年、5年,步頻均高于術(shù)后3個(gè)月(P=0.017,P=0.000,P=0.002); 術(shù)后3年,步頻高于術(shù)后1年(P=0.003); 術(shù)后5年,步頻與術(shù)后1年、3年比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.130,P=0.137)。術(shù)后3個(gè)月、1年、3年、5年,步長(zhǎng)、步幅均長(zhǎng)于術(shù)前(P=0.007,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.002,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000); 術(shù)后1年、3年、5年,步長(zhǎng)、步幅均長(zhǎng)于術(shù)后3個(gè)月(P=0.008,P=0.000,P=0.003; P=0.014,P=0.000,P=0.010); 術(shù)后3年,步長(zhǎng)、步幅均長(zhǎng)于術(shù)后1年(P=0.012; P=0.015); 術(shù)后5年,步長(zhǎng)、步幅與術(shù)后1年、3年比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.293,P=0.492; P=0.326,P=0.352)。結(jié)論:腓骨小段截骨術(shù)后5年內(nèi),KOA患者患肢支撐時(shí)間呈先上升后下降趨勢(shì),肢體擺動(dòng)時(shí)間、患側(cè)單步時(shí)間均呈下降趨勢(shì),步速、步頻、步長(zhǎng)、步幅均呈上升趨勢(shì),提示患者膝關(guān)節(jié)功能獲得改善。
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the characteristics of gait parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA)after small segmental fibular osteotomy.Methods:Forty-six KOA patients who underwent small segmental fibular osteotomy were enrolled,including 18 males and 28 females,and the age ranged from 58 to 72 years,with a median of 65 years.The gait parameters of patients were collected by IDEEA3,a wearable intelligent device for gait analysis,before surgery and at 3 months,1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,respectively,and the characteristics of gait parameters were analyzed.Results:Six patients dropped out as a result of loss to follow-up,and 40 patients were eventually included for characteristics analysis of gait parameters.①Support time of the affected leg.The support time of the affected leg increased first and then decreased at different time points(421.02±90.49,449.04±72.02,477.34±136.40,488.31±57.99,432.26±45.18 ms,F=9.672,P=0.000).At 3 months,1 year,and 3 years after surgery,the support time of the affected leg was longer than that before surgery(P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.000).At 5 years after surgery,the support time of the affected leg was shorter than that at 1 year and 3 years after surgery(P=0.020,P=0.000),but compared with the support time before surgery and at 3 months after surgery,the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.394,P=0.098).At 1 year and 3 years after surgery,the support time of the affected leg was longer than that at 3 months after surgery(P=0.047,P=0.000).There was no significant difference in the support time of the affected leg at 3 years after surgery compared with that at 1 year after surgery(P=0.553).②Limb swing time and one-step time of the affected side.The limb swing time and the one-step time of the affected side showed a decreasing trend at different time points(461.78±72.53,432.24±53.78,430.97±46.98,402.71±28.27,411.01±42.78 ms,F=8.521,P=0.000; 700.44±162.84,615.03±94.18,588.90±71.76,551.88±49.91,566.18±38.20 ms,F=22.102,P=0.000).At 3 months,1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the limb swing time and the one-step time of the affected side were shorter than those before surgery(P=0.037,P=0.018,P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000).At 1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the one-step time of the affected side was shorter than that at 3 months after surgery(P=0.036,P=0.000,P=0.005).Compared with the limb swing time at 3 months after surgery,there was no significant difference in that at 1 year and 5 years after surgery(P=0.892,P=0.084).At 3 years after surgery,the limb swing time was shorter than that at 3 months after surgery(P=0.008).At 3 years after surgery,the limb swing time and the one-step time of the affected side were shorter than those at 1 year after surgery(P=0.004,P=0.005).Compared with the limb swing time and the one-step time of the affected side at 1 year and 3 years after surgery,there was no significant difference in that at 5 years after surgery(P=0.060,P=0.281; P=0.086,P=0.152).③Gait velocity,step frequency,step length,and stride length.Gait velocity,step frequency,step length,and stride length showed an upward trend at different time points(41.19±15.71,48.92±13.15,56.04±15.50,61.89±13.15,58.33±10.66 m/min,F=19.652,P=0.000; 90.10±16.17,99.83±12.17,104.09±11.20,110.44±8.89,107.59±7.24 steps/min,F=26.333,P=0.000; 0.45±0.11,0.49±0.10,0.53±0.10,0.57±0.09,0.56±0.08 m,F=14.302,P=0.000; 0.87±0.24,0.97±0.20,1.05±0.18,1.12±0.17,1.09±0.16 m,F=15.307,P=0.000).At 3 months,1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the gait velocity was greater than that before surgery(P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000).At 1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the gait velocity was greater than that at 3 months after surgery(P=0.003,P=0.000,P=0.000).At 3 years after surgery,the gait velocity was greater than that at 1 year after surgery(P=0.013).The gait velocity at 5 years after surgery was not significantly different from that at 1 year and 3 years after surgery(P=0.495,P=0.215).At 3 months,1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the step frequency was higher than that before surgery(P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000).At 1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the step frequency was higher than that at 3 months after surgery(P=0.017,P=0.000,P=0.002).At 3 years after surgery,the step frequency was higher than that at 1 year after surgery(P=0.003).There was no significant difference in step frequency at 5 years after surgery compared with that at 1 year and 3 years after surgery(P=0.130,P=0.137).At 3 months,1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the step length and stride length were greater than those before surgery(P=0.007,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000; P=0.002,P=0.000,P=0.000,P=0.000).At 1 year,3 years,and 5 years after surgery,the step length and stride length were greater than those at 3 months after surgery(P=0.008,P=0.000,P=0.003; P=0.014,P=0.000,P=0.010).At 3 years after surgery,the step length and stride length were greater than those at 1 year after surgery(P=0.012; P=0.015).The step length and stride length at 5 years after surgery were not significantly different from those at 1 year and 3 years after surgery(P=0.293,P=0.492; P=0.326,P=0.352).Conclusion:Within 5 years after small segmental fibular osteotomy,the support time of the affected leg in KOA patients shows an upward-downward trend,the limb swing time and the one-step time of the affected side shows a decreasing trend,and the gait velocity,step frequency,step length,and stride length shows an increasing trend,suggesting that the knee function of the patients is improved.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] PRAKASH L,DHAR S A.Proximal fibular osteotomy:biomechanics,indications,technique,and results[J].Orthopedics,2020,43(6):e627-e631.
[2] LAIK J K,KAUSHAL R,KUMAR R,et al.Proximal fibular osteotomy:alternative approach with medial compartment osteoarthritis knee-Indian context[J].J Family Med Prim Care,2020,9(5):2364-2369.
[3] DEMIRKIRAN N D.Simultaneous application of proximal fibular osteotomy and unicondylar knee arthroplasty[J].Cureus,2019,11(5):e4763
[4] YANG Z Y,CHEN W,LI C X,et al.Medial compartment decompression by fibular osteotomy to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis:a pilot study[J].Orthopedics,2015,38(12):e1110-e1114.
[5] AHMED M,BUX M,KUMAR M,et al.Proximal fibular osteotomy in the management of osteoarthritis of medial compartment of knee joint[J].Cureus,2020,12(6):e8481.
[6] 李存祥,賈素華,王健,等.單純腓骨截?cái)嘈g(shù)治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎臨床研究[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)創(chuàng)新,2010,7(2):115-117.
[7] 張英澤,李存祥,李冀東,等.不均勻沉降在膝關(guān)節(jié)退變及內(nèi)翻過(guò)程中機(jī)制的研究[J].河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2014,35(2):218-219.
[8] WANG X,WEI L,LV Z,et al.Proximal fibular osteotomy:a new surgery for pain relief and improvement of joint function in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J].J Int Med Res,2017,45(1):282-289.
[9] 蔣協(xié)遠(yuǎn),王大偉.骨科臨床療效評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[M].北京:人民衛(wèi)生出版社,2005.
[10] 李祖榮,羅樺杰,陳梅花,等.步態(tài)分析和JOA評(píng)分評(píng)定運(yùn)動(dòng)療法及手法治療膝骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎效果[J].按摩與康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué),2014,5(11):21-22.
[11] 王常海,李峰,張蓉,等.步態(tài)分析技術(shù)在膝骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎康復(fù)中的應(yīng)用[J].中國(guó)康復(fù)理論與實(shí)踐,2007,13(7):686-687.
[12] 中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)骨科學(xué)分會(huì).骨關(guān)節(jié)炎診治指南(2007年版)[J].中華骨科雜志,2007,27(10):793-796.
[13] 陳偉,張英澤,侯志勇,等.應(yīng)用腓骨截骨術(shù)治療膝關(guān)節(jié)骨關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].實(shí)用骨科雜志,2015,21(10):945-946.
[14] 余建平,魏杰,蘇云星.腓骨截骨術(shù)治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的臨床分析[J].中國(guó)藥物與臨床,2015,15(8):1161-1162.
[15] 董伊隆,錢(qián)約男,李一民,等.腓骨近端截骨術(shù)和膝關(guān)節(jié)單髁置換術(shù)治療不同嚴(yán)重程度膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的療效比較[J].中國(guó)骨傷,2020,33(1):4-10.
[16] 蔣萬(wàn)忠,謝科,程永超,等.腓骨近端截骨術(shù)與人工全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)治療內(nèi)翻型膝關(guān)節(jié)骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的短期療效比較[J].臨床和實(shí)驗(yàn)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2019,18(15):1653-1656.
[17] 劉同玉,阮永龍,陶新兵,等.腓骨近端截骨術(shù)與人工全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換治療膝關(guān)節(jié)骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的近期療效觀(guān)察[J].安徽醫(yī)學(xué),2019,40(5):540-542.
[18] HUDA N,ISLAM M S U,KUMAR H,et al.Proximal fibular osteotomy for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis:is it worth? [J]Indian J Orthop,2020,54(Suppl 1):47-51.
[19] 裴開(kāi)源,劉愛(ài)峰,楊碩,等.膝骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎步態(tài)分析研究進(jìn)展[J].吉林中醫(yī)藥,2016,36(5):533-537.
[20] 郝朋,楊柳,何銳,等.人工單髁關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后步態(tài)及臨床療效分析[J].中國(guó)修復(fù)重建外科雜志,2020,34(11):1369-1375.
[21] 楊金發(fā),宋善新,周果.活動(dòng)半月板單髁關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)對(duì)膝關(guān)節(jié)內(nèi)側(cè)單間室骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎患者手術(shù)指標(biāo)、膝關(guān)節(jié)功能及步態(tài)指數(shù)的影響[J].中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)工程,2021,29(3):135-138.
[22] 何金龍,余俊,楊海波,等.三維步態(tài)分析系統(tǒng)在膝骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎患者中的臨床研究[J].寧夏醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2021,43(8):721-724.
[23] 趙輝,吳海山.步態(tài)分析在全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J].中華骨科雜志,2010(6):630-634.
[24] 周萌,曹光磊,張寬,等.便攜式步態(tài)分析儀量化評(píng)價(jià)全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換病人的步態(tài)特征[J].中國(guó)矯形外科雜志,2015,23(7):615-619.
[25] 郭林,崔大平.全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換前后的三維步態(tài)分析[J].中國(guó)組織工程研究與臨床康復(fù),2008,12(13):2417-2420.
[26] 李佳,邱冰.三維步態(tài)分析在膝關(guān)節(jié)疾病的運(yùn)用進(jìn)展[J].臨床醫(yī)藥文獻(xiàn)電子雜志,2019,6(94):192-194.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]樊慶陽(yáng),任凱晶.定制3D打印切模輔助全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)治療 膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎合并股骨干骨折畸形愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):37.
[2]劉曉雅,孫永強(qiáng),劉國(guó)杰.主動(dòng)快速康復(fù)鍛煉對(duì)全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):73.
[3]鄭春松,葉蕻芝,李西海,等.透骨消痛膠囊中補(bǔ)腎柔肝藥和活血祛風(fēng)藥治療 骨關(guān)節(jié)炎作用方式的計(jì)算機(jī)模擬比較[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):6.
　ZHENG Chunsong,YE Hongzhi,LI Xihai,et al.Comparison of the mode of action of Bushen Rougan(補(bǔ)腎柔肝)drugs versus Huoxue Qufeng(活血祛風(fēng))drugs contained in Tougu Xiaotong Jiaonang(透骨消痛膠囊)for the treatment of osteoarthritis:A computer simulation study[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):6.
[4]宋兵華,孫俊英,倪增良,等.全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)前CT測(cè)量股骨后髁角的臨床意義[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):38.
[5]鄭春松,葉蕻芝,李西海,等.獨(dú)活寄生湯含藥血清對(duì)白細(xì)胞介素1β誘導(dǎo)的 退變關(guān)節(jié)軟骨細(xì)胞中基質(zhì)金屬蛋白酶 和環(huán)氧化酶2表達(dá)的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):1.
　ZHENG Chunsong,YE Hongzhi,LI Xihai,et al.Impact of Duhuo Jisheng Tang(獨(dú)活寄生湯)medicated serum on expression of matrix metalloproteinase and cyclooxygenase 2 in degenerative articular chondrocytes induced by interleukin-1 beta[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):1.
[6]王金良,孫京濤,李玲,等.骨水泥聯(lián)合螺釘修復(fù)全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)中 脛骨平臺(tái)內(nèi)側(cè)骨缺損[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):55.
[7]馮榮,王平,李炳奇,等.鈹針刺絡(luò)拔罐結(jié)合中藥口服治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎合并 原發(fā)性血小板增多癥1例[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):73.
[8]蔡云仙.圍手術(shù)期耳穴按壓聯(lián)合平衡針療法 在全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):41.
[9]張榮,王健.人工全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)的圍手術(shù)期心理護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):77.
[10]喻長(zhǎng)純,楊明路,王戰(zhàn)朝.不同手術(shù)方式治療脛骨平臺(tái)骨折畸形愈合的體會(huì)[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):37.
[11]孟維娜,明立功,王新德,等.關(guān)節(jié)鏡下清理聯(lián)合腓骨近1/3段截骨治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):40.
[12]明立功,孟維娜,王新德,等.腓骨近端截骨治療內(nèi)側(cè)間室膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的近期療效觀(guān)察[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):25.
[13]張杰,王人彥,張玉柱.膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的治療進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):68.
[14]梁朝,蔡靜怡,閆立,等.針刀療法改善膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎早期疼痛癥狀的療效評(píng)價(jià)[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):9.
　LIANG Zhao,CAI Jingyi,YAN Li,et al.Evaluation of the curative effect of needle-knife therapy for relieving knee pain in patients with early knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):9.
[15]王建武,黨建軍,李強(qiáng),等.四聯(lián)療法治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):44.
[16]劉紅娟,郭會(huì)利,郭樹(shù)農(nóng).云克聯(lián)合中藥治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):75.
[17]陳衛(wèi)衡.探索建立系統(tǒng)的膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎中醫(yī)臨床科研范式 和理論體系[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):1.
[18]帥波,沈霖,楊艷萍,等.加味青娥丸治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的作用機(jī)制研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):15.
　SHUAI Bo,SHEN Lin,YANG Yanping,et al.Study on the mechanism of action of Jiawei Qing'e Wan(加味青娥丸)for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):15.
[19]梅其杰,袁長(zhǎng)深,段戡,等.壯藥骨痹方燙熨聯(lián)合運(yùn)動(dòng)療法治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):27.
　MEI Qijie,YUAN Changshen,DUAN Kan,et al.Clinical study of the curative effect of hot compressing and rubbing with packet of Gubi Fang(骨痹方)combined with exercise therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):27.
[20]王丹輝,張燕,劉麗娟,等.重組人Ⅱ型腫瘤壞死因子受體-抗體融合蛋白 關(guān)節(jié)腔注射聯(lián)合中藥薰洗治療膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):31.
　WANG Danhui,ZHANG Yan,LIU Lijuan,et al.Clinical study on intra-articular injection of TypeⅡrecombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor-Fc fusion protein combined with Chinese herbal steaming and washing therapy for treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):31.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
基金項(xiàng)目:邢臺(tái)市重點(diǎn)研發(fā)計(jì)劃自籌項(xiàng)目(2020ZC235) 通訊作者:李存祥 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01