84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]鄧閩軍,翁偉,孫振國,等.股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路與膝前正中旁側(cè)入路全膝關節(jié)置換術治療膝骨關節(jié)炎的比較研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(01):15-21.
 DENG Minjun,WENG Wei,SUN Zhenguo,et al.A comparative study of total knee arthroplasty through subvastus approach versus anterior knee paramedian approach for treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2021,33(01):15-21.
點擊復制

股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路與膝前正中旁側(cè)入路全膝關節(jié)置換術治療膝骨關節(jié)炎的比較研究()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第33卷
期數(shù):
2021年01期
頁碼:
15-21
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2021-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative study of total knee arthroplasty through subvastus approach versus anterior knee paramedian approach for treatment of knee osteoarthritis
作者:
鄧閩軍翁偉孫振國楊紅航
(湖州市第一人民醫(yī)院,浙江 湖州 313000)
Author(s):
DENG MinjunWENG WeiSUN ZhenguoYANG Honghang
The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou,Huzhou 313000,Zhejiang,China
關鍵詞:
骨關節(jié)炎 關節(jié)成形術置換 手術入路 臨床試驗
Keywords:
osteoarthritisknee arthroplastyreplacementknee operative approach clinical trial
摘要:
目的:比較股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路全膝關節(jié)置換術(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)和膝前正中旁側(cè)入路TKA治療膝骨關節(jié)炎的臨床療效。方法:回顧性分析120例膝骨關節(jié)炎患者的病例資料,其中采用股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路TKA治療60例(股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路組),采用膝前正中旁側(cè)入路TKA治療60例(膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組)。比較2組患者的切口長度、失血量、手術時間、初次主動直腿抬高時間、住院時間、膝關節(jié)疼痛視覺模擬量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)評分、膝關節(jié)活動度、美國特種外科醫(yī)院(Hospital for Special Surgery,HSS)膝關節(jié)功能評分及簡明健康狀況調(diào)查表(short form 36 health survey questionnaire,SF-36)評分。結(jié)果:①一般指標。股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路組患者的切口長度、初次主動直腿抬高時間、住院時間均短于膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組[(12.45±1.00)cm,(16.00±0.89)cm,t=-12.056,P=0.000;(2.35±0.40)d,(3.43±0.47)d,t=-7.816,P=0.000;(8.60±1.27)d,(9.85±0.88)d,t=-3.618,P=0.001],失血量少于膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組[(375.85±12.51)mL,(396.25±7.93)mL,t=-6.161,P=0.000],手術時間長于膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組[(74.65±4.89)min,(64.30±7.74)min,t=5.746,P=0.000]。②膝關節(jié)疼痛VAS評分。時間因素和分組因素存在交互效應(F=19.907,P=0.000); 2組患者的膝關節(jié)疼痛VAS評分比較,組間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,即不存在分組效應(F=0.077,P=0.787); 手術前后不同時間點膝關節(jié)疼痛VAS評分的差異有統(tǒng)計學意義,即存在時間效應(F=0.021,P=0.000); 2組患者手術前后膝關節(jié)疼痛VAS評分均呈下降趨勢(F=0.951,P=0.000; F=0.269,P=0.000); 但2組的下降趨勢不完全一致; 術前、術后1個月、術后6個月、術后12個月2組患者膝關節(jié)疼痛VAS評分組間比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義[(5.90±0.64)分,(5.70±0.73)分,t=0.919,P=0.364;(2.70±0.47)分,(2.90±0.31)分,t=1.592,P=0.120;(2.05±0.76)分,(2.20±0.41)分,t=0.777,P=0.442;(1.55±0.51)分,(1.80±0.41)分,t=1.707,P=0.096]; 術后3 d股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路組膝關節(jié)疼痛VAS評分低于膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組[(4.10±0.79)分,(4.55±0.51)分,t=2.143,P=0.039]。③膝關節(jié)活動度。時間因素和分組因素存在交互效應(F=11.204,P=0.000); 2組患者的膝關節(jié)活動度比較,組間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,即不存在分組效應(F=0.782,P=0.921); 手術前后不同時間點膝關節(jié)活動度的差異有統(tǒng)計學意義,即存在時間效應(F=5.367,P=0.000); 2組患者手術前后膝關節(jié)活動度均呈上升趨勢(F=7.541,P=0.000; F=6.247,P=0.000); 但2組的上升趨勢不完全一致; 術前及術后12個月,2組患者膝關節(jié)活動度組間比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(51.50°±6.51°,52.35°±5.87°,t=1.853,P=0.072; 110.25°±3.43°,105.50°±3.20°,t=4.525,P=0.096); 術后3 d、術后1個月、術后6個月,股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路組膝關節(jié)活動度均高于膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組(67.00°±2.99°,63.00°±2.51°,t=4.579,P=0.000; 97.70°±5.49°,93.72°±6.46°,t=2.083,P=0.044; 103.75°±2.75°,100.00°±2.29°,t=4.682,P=0.000)。④HSS膝關節(jié)功能評分。時間因素和分組因素存在交互效應(F=16.513,P=0.000); 2組患者的HSS膝關節(jié)功能評分比較,組間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,即不存在分組效應(F=0.954,P=0.745); 手術前后不同時間點HSS膝關節(jié)功能評分的差異有統(tǒng)計學意義,即存在時間效應(F=6.7821,P=0.000); 2組患者手術前后HSS膝關節(jié)功能評分均呈上升趨勢(F=12.235,P=0.000; F=10.907,P=0.000); 但2組的上升趨勢不完全一致; 術前、術后6個月及術后12個月,2組患者HSS膝關節(jié)功能評分組間比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義[(61.00±4.76)分,(60.50±3.59)分,t=0.375,P=0.710;(82.35±2.50)分,(80.50±4.26)分,t=1.675,P=0.102;(87.20±1.47)分,(86.35±1.27)分,t=1.956,P=0.058]; 術后3 d、術后1個月,股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路組HSS膝關節(jié)功能評分均高于膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組[(72.25±4.13)分,(68.75±6.04)分,t=2.139,P=0.039;(76.50±5.16)分,(73.25±3.35)分,t=2.363,P=0.023]。⑤SF-36健康調(diào)查簡表評分。末次隨訪時,股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路組患者的SF-36健康調(diào)查簡表評分高于膝前正中旁側(cè)入路組[(76.55±2.65)分,(74.40±3.00)分,t=2.405,P=0.021]。結(jié)論:股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路TKA治療膝骨關節(jié)炎,與膝前正中旁側(cè)入路TKA相比,短期臨床療效較好,有利于提高患者生活質(zhì)量,且切口長度、初次主動直腿抬高時間、住院時間較短,術中失血量較少,但手術時間較長。
Abstract:
To compare the clinical curative effects of total knee arthroplasty(TKA)through subvastus approach(SVA)versus anterior knee paramedian approach(PMA)for treatment of knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Methods:The medical records of 120 KOA patients were analyzed retrospectively.Sixty patients were treated with TKA through SVA(SVA group),while the others were treated with TKA through anterior knee PMA(PMA group).The incision length,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,initial active straight-leg-raise(ASLR)time,hospital stays,knee pain visual analogue scale(VAS)scores,knee range of motion(ROM),Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)knee function scores and the short form 36 health survey questionnaire(SF-36)scores were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.Results:The incision length,initial ASLR time and hospital stays were shorter,the intraoperative blood loss was less and the operative time was longer in SVA group compared to PMA group(12.45±1.00 vs 16.00±0.89 cm,t=-12.056,P=0.000; 2.35±0.40 vs 3.43±0.47 days,t=-7.816,P=0.000; 8.60±1.27 vs 9.85±0.88 days,t=-3.618,P=0.001; 375.85±12.51 vs 396.25±7.93 mL,t=-6.161,P=0.000; 74.65±4.89 vs 64.30±7.74 minutes,t=5.746,P=0.000).There was interaction between time factor and group factor in knee pain VAS scores(F=19.907,P=0.000).et al

參考文獻/References:

[1] VAISHYA R,VIJAY V,DEMESUGH D M,et al.Surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty[J].J Clin Orthop Trauma,2016,7(2):71-79.
[2] SHAH N A,JAIN N P.Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees using minimally invasive medial-subvastus approach[J].Indian J Orthop,2016,50(1):25-33.
[3] HOFMANN A A,PIASTER R L,MURDOCK L E.Subvastus(Southern)approach for primary total knee arthroplasty[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1991(269):70-77.
[4] UNWIN O,HASSABALLA M,MURRAY J,et al.Minimally invasive surgery(MIS)for total knee replacement; medium term results with minimum five year follow-up[J].Knee,2017,24(2):454-459.
[5] HUANG A B,WANG H J,YU J K,et al.Optimal patellar alignment with minimally invasive approaches in total knee arthroplasty after a minimum five year follow-up[J].Int Orthop,2016,40(3):487-492.
[6] KOH I J,KIM M W,KIM M S,et al.The patient’s perception does not differ following subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty:a simultaneous bilateral randomized study[J].J Arthroplasty,2016,31(1):112-117.
[7] 中華醫(yī)學會骨科學分會.骨關節(jié)炎診治指南(2007年版)[J].中華骨科雜志,2007,27(10):793-796.
[8] 蔣協(xié)遠,王大偉.骨科臨床療效評價標準[M].北京:人民衛(wèi)生出版社,2005:177-178.
[9] 方積乾.生存質(zhì)量測評方法與應用[M].北京:北京醫(yī)科大學出版社,2000:263-268.
[10] 姚運峰,康鵬德,薛晨曦,等.經(jīng)股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下微創(chuàng)入路與傳統(tǒng)入路行人工全膝關節(jié)置換術的前瞻性隨機對照研究[J].中國修復重建外科雜志,2018,32(2):162-168.
[11] 王威明.股內(nèi)側(cè)肌下入路和有限髕旁入路微創(chuàng)全膝關節(jié)置換術早期臨床效果比較研究[J].中國臨床醫(yī)生雜志,2018,46(5):560-562.
[12] 季康,陳剛,徐紅偉,等.單髁置換術治療膝關節(jié)內(nèi)側(cè)間室骨關節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(11):44-46.
[13] 楊建平,呂正祥,蔣濤,等.不放置引流管對中重度膝骨關節(jié)炎初次全膝關節(jié)置換術后快速康復的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(5):7-14.
[14] 周鑫,林樂琴,董程程,等.艾灸聯(lián)合功能鍛煉在全膝關節(jié)置換術后康復治療中的應用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(1):14-19.
[15] 高輝,陳慶真.改良股肌下入路微創(chuàng)全膝關節(jié)置換術的臨床應用[J].中華臨床醫(yī)師雜志(電子版),2011,5(15):4427-4431.
[16] 李帥華,徐棟梁,何沛恒,等.應用自制組配式截骨工具行微創(chuàng)全膝關節(jié)置換:延長切口長度的影響因素[J].中國組織工程研究,2014,18(53):8553-8559.
[17] SHAH N A,PATIL H G,VAISHNAV O V,et al.Total knee arthroplasty using subvastus approach in stiff knee:a retrospective analysis of 110 cases[J]. Indian J Orthop,2016,50(2):166-171.
[18] LI Z Y,CHENG W D,SUN L Y,et al.Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty:a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Int Orthop, 2018,42(3):543-549.
[19] KEKATPURE A,SHAH N,NISTANE P,et al.Mid-term follow up results of mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty in obese patients[J].Reconstructive review,2017,7(3):23-28.
[20] 孫俊英,汪強,馬良波,等.經(jīng)小切口股內(nèi)側(cè)肌入路與小切口髕骨內(nèi)側(cè)旁入路行全膝關節(jié)置換術比較的臨床研究[J].中華關節(jié)外科雜志(電子版),2008,2(3):28-31.
[21] 陳煜東,魏瑄,劉宏建.單髁置換術治療老年膝關節(jié)內(nèi)側(cè)間室骨關節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2018,30(6):67-69.
[22] TENG Y J,DU W J,JIANG J,et al.Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty:meta-analysis[J].Orthopedics,2012,35(12):e1722-e1731.
[23] 劉凱緣,楊東,徐天陽,等.經(jīng)股內(nèi)側(cè)肌入路全膝關節(jié)置換術中髕骨位置對軟組織平衡及臨床療效的影響[J].中華骨科雜志,2020,40(7):433-440.

相似文獻/References:

[1]樊慶陽,任凱晶.定制3D打印切模輔助全膝關節(jié)置換術治療 膝骨關節(jié)炎合并股骨干骨折畸形愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):37.
[2]劉曉雅,孫永強,劉國杰.主動快速康復鍛煉對全膝關節(jié)置換術后關節(jié)活動度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):73.
[3]鄭春松,葉蕻芝,李西海,等.透骨消痛膠囊中補腎柔肝藥和活血祛風藥治療 骨關節(jié)炎作用方式的計算機模擬比較[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):6.
 ZHENG Chunsong,YE Hongzhi,LI Xihai,et al.Comparison of the mode of action of Bushen Rougan(補腎柔肝)drugs versus Huoxue Qufeng(活血祛風)drugs contained in Tougu Xiaotong Jiaonang(透骨消痛膠囊)for the treatment of osteoarthritis:A computer simulation study[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):6.
[4]宋兵華,孫俊英,倪增良,等.全膝關節(jié)置換術前CT測量股骨后髁角的臨床意義[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):38.
[5]鄭春松,葉蕻芝,李西海,等.獨活寄生湯含藥血清對白細胞介素1β誘導的 退變關節(jié)軟骨細胞中基質(zhì)金屬蛋白酶 和環(huán)氧化酶2表達的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):1.
 ZHENG Chunsong,YE Hongzhi,LI Xihai,et al.Impact of Duhuo Jisheng Tang(獨活寄生湯)medicated serum on expression of matrix metalloproteinase and cyclooxygenase 2 in degenerative articular chondrocytes induced by interleukin-1 beta[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):1.
[6]王金良,孫京濤,李玲,等.骨水泥聯(lián)合螺釘修復全膝關節(jié)置換術中 脛骨平臺內(nèi)側(cè)骨缺損[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):55.
[7]馮榮,王平,李炳奇,等.鈹針刺絡拔罐結(jié)合中藥口服治療膝骨關節(jié)炎合并 原發(fā)性血小板增多癥1例[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):73.
[8]蔡云仙.圍手術期耳穴按壓聯(lián)合平衡針療法 在全膝關節(jié)置換術后鎮(zhèn)痛中的應用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):41.
[9]張榮,王健.人工全膝關節(jié)置換術的圍手術期心理護理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):77.
[10]喻長純,楊明路,王戰(zhàn)朝.不同手術方式治療脛骨平臺骨折畸形愈合的體會[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):37.
[11]孟維娜,明立功,王新德,等.關節(jié)鏡下清理聯(lián)合腓骨近1/3段截骨治療膝骨關節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):40.
[12]明立功,孟維娜,王新德,等.腓骨近端截骨治療內(nèi)側(cè)間室膝骨關節(jié)炎的近期療效觀察[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):25.
[13]張杰,王人彥,張玉柱.膝骨關節(jié)炎的治療進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(10):68.
[14]梁朝,蔡靜怡,閆立,等.針刀療法改善膝骨關節(jié)炎早期疼痛癥狀的療效評價[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):9.
 LIANG Zhao,CAI Jingyi,YAN Li,et al.Evaluation of the curative effect of needle-knife therapy for relieving knee pain in patients with early knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):9.
[15]王建武,黨建軍,李強,等.四聯(lián)療法治療膝骨關節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):44.
[16]劉紅娟,郭會利,郭樹農(nóng).云克聯(lián)合中藥治療膝骨關節(jié)炎的護理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):75.
[17]陳衛(wèi)衡.探索建立系統(tǒng)的膝骨關節(jié)炎中醫(yī)臨床科研范式 和理論體系[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):1.
[18]帥波,沈霖,楊艷萍,等.加味青娥丸治療膝骨關節(jié)炎的作用機制研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):15.
 SHUAI Bo,SHEN Lin,YANG Yanping,et al.Study on the mechanism of action of Jiawei Qing'e Wan(加味青娥丸)for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):15.
[19]梅其杰,袁長深,段戡,等.壯藥骨痹方燙熨聯(lián)合運動療法治療膝骨關節(jié)炎的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):27.
 MEI Qijie,YUAN Changshen,DUAN Kan,et al.Clinical study of the curative effect of hot compressing and rubbing with packet of Gubi Fang(骨痹方)combined with exercise therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):27.
[20]王丹輝,張燕,劉麗娟,等.重組人Ⅱ型腫瘤壞死因子受體-抗體融合蛋白 關節(jié)腔注射聯(lián)合中藥薰洗治療膝骨關節(jié)炎的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):31.
 WANG Danhui,ZHANG Yan,LIU Lijuan,et al.Clinical study on intra-articular injection of TypeⅡrecombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor-Fc fusion protein combined with Chinese herbal steaming and washing therapy for treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(01):31.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
基金項目:浙江省基礎公益研究計劃項目(LGF20H060009)
通訊作者:孫振國 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-20