84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]李文龍,李陽陽,張海龍,等.腕踝針聯(lián)合自控鎮(zhèn)痛泵治療全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(10):24-28.
　LI Wenlong,LI Yangyang,ZHANG Hailong,et al.Clinical study on wrist-ankle acupuncture analgesia combined with patient-controlled analgesia for treatment of hip pain after total hip arthroplasty[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(10):24-28.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

腕踝針聯(lián)合自控鎮(zhèn)痛泵治療全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛的臨床研究()
分享到：

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第28卷
期數(shù):
2016年10期
頁碼:
24-28
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2016-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical study on wrist-ankle acupuncture analgesia combined with patient-controlled analgesia for treatment of hip pain after total hip arthroplasty
作者:
李文龍1; 李陽陽1; 張海龍1; 劉又文2
1.河南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué),河南 鄭州 450008;
2.河南省洛陽正骨醫(yī)院/河南省骨科醫(yī)院,河南 洛陽 471002
Author(s):
LI Wenlong1; LI Yangyang1; ZHANG Hailong1; LIU Youwen2
1.Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450008,Henan,China 2.Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital,Luoyang 471002,Henan,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
關(guān)節(jié)成形術(shù); 置換; 髖;  疼痛; 手術(shù)后;  針刺鎮(zhèn)痛;  鎮(zhèn)痛; 病人控制
Keywords:
arthroplasty; replacement; hip;  pain; postoperative;  acupuncture analgesia;  analgesia; patient-controlled
摘要:
目的:觀察腕踝針聯(lián)合自控鎮(zhèn)痛泵(patient controlled analgesia,PCA)治療全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)(total hip arthroplasty,THA)后髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛的臨床療效和安全性。方法:68例接受單側(cè)THA手術(shù)的患者隨機(jī)分為2組,腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組35例、PCA組33例。2組患者術(shù)前均接受疼痛知識宣教,術(shù)后均采用PCA鎮(zhèn)痛48 h。腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組在此基礎(chǔ)上從術(shù)前3 d開始行腕踝針針刺鎮(zhèn)痛治療,每日1次,10 d為1個(gè)療程,共治療1個(gè)療程。記錄術(shù)后48 h內(nèi)2組患者每12 h的PCA鎮(zhèn)痛藥使用量; 分別在術(shù)后12、24、36、48 h及術(shù)后3、4、5 d采用疼痛視覺模擬量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)對2組患者髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛情況進(jìn)行評估; 觀察術(shù)后48 h內(nèi)2組患者不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生情況; 術(shù)后2周,依據(jù)髖關(guān)節(jié)Harris評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)評價(jià)髖關(guān)節(jié)功能。結(jié)果:2組患者髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛VAS評分術(shù)后不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)間的差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,即存在時(shí)間效應(yīng)(F=220.239,P=0.000); 術(shù)后12、24、36、48 h時(shí),2組髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛VAS評分的組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[(6.22±1.01)分,(6.15±1.13)分,t=0.273,P=0.786;(5.32±0.99)分,(5.17±1.27)分,t=0.513,P=0.610;(3.83±0.26)分,(3.92±0.34)分,t=-1.667,P=0.098;(3.06±0.28)分,(2.99±0.23)分,t=0.954,P=0.344]; 術(shù)后3、4、5 d時(shí),腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛VAS評分低于PCA組[(3.68±0.25)分,(4.17±0.32)分,t=-7.528,P=0.000;(3.58±0.35)分,(4.03±0.26)分,t=-5.878,P=0.000;(2.96±0.48)分,(3.17±0.24)分,t=-2.244,P=0.029]; 2組間總體比較,腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛VAS評分低于PCA組,即存在分組效應(yīng)(F=5.617,P=0.021); 時(shí)間因素和分組因素之間不存在交互效應(yīng)(F=2.621,P=0.058)。2組患者術(shù)后不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)間鎮(zhèn)痛藥用量的差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,即存在時(shí)間效應(yīng)(F=667.298,P=0.000); 術(shù)后0～12 h、12～24 h、24～36 h、36～48 h腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組鎮(zhèn)痛藥用量均少于PCA組[(76.49±7.69)mL,(80.98±5.81)mL,t=-2.705,P=0.009;(63.51±6.10)mL,(69.98±5.37)mL,t=-4.636,P=0.000;(45.61±4.29)mL,(49.76±6.01)mL,t=-3.295,P=0.002;(41.28±3.75)mL,(43.52±3.85)mL,t=-2.430,P=0.018]; 2組間總體比較,腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組鎮(zhèn)痛藥用量少于PCA組,即存在分組效應(yīng)(F=37.065,P=0.000); 時(shí)間因素和分組因素不存在交互效應(yīng)(F=1.765,P=0.155)。術(shù)后2周,腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組患髖Harris評分高于PCA組[(80.37±4.56)分,(76.06±2.73)分,t=4.693,P=0.000]。術(shù)后48 h內(nèi),腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組發(fā)生惡心嘔吐6例、尿潴留3例、眩暈2例、嗜睡2例,PCA組發(fā)生惡心嘔吐13例、尿潴留8例、眩暈3例、嗜睡4例; 腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA組不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率低于PCA組(χ2=16.147,P=0.000)。結(jié)論:對于THA術(shù)后髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛,腕踝針聯(lián)合PCA較單純PCA鎮(zhèn)痛效果好、鎮(zhèn)痛藥用量少,有利于髖關(guān)節(jié)功能恢復(fù),且不良反應(yīng)少。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical curative effects and safety of wrist-ankle acupuncture analgesia combined with patient-controlled analgesia(PCA)in treatment of hip pain after total hip arthroplasty(THA).Methods:Sixty-eight patients who received unilateral THA were randomly divided into combination group(35 cases)and PCA group(33 cases).All patients in both of the groups were taught pain knowledge before surgery,and then received PCA analgesia for 48 hours after surgery.Meanwhile,the patients in combination group were treated with wrist-ankle acupuncture analgesia from the third day before surgery,once a day for one course of treatment,10 days for each course.The consumption of PCA analgesics were recorded every 12 hours within 48 hours after surgery.The hip pain were evaluated by using visual analogue scale(VAS)at 12,24,36 and 48 hours and 3,4 and 5 days after surgery respectively.The incidence rates of adverse reactions were observed within 48 hours after surgery and the hip function were also evaluated according to Harris hip scoring standard.Results:There was statistical difference in hip pain VAS scores between different postoperative timepoints,in other words,there was time effect(F=220.239,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in hip pain VAS scores between the 2 groups at 12,24,36 and 48 hours after surgery(6.22+/-1.01 vs 6.15+/-1.13 points,t=0.273,P=0.786; 5.32+/-0.99 vs 5.17+/-1.27 points,t=0.513,P=0.610; 3.83+/-0.26 vs 3.92+/-0.34 points,t=-1.667,P=0.098; 3.06+/-0.28 vs 2.99+/-0.23 points,t=0.954,P=0.344).The hip pain VAS scores were lower in combination group compared to PCA group at 3,4 and 5 days after surgery(3.68+/-0.25 vs 4.17+/-0.32 points,t=-7.528,P=0.000; 3.58+/-0.35 vs 4.03+/-0.26 points,t=-5.878,P=0.000; 2.96+/-0.48 vs 3.17+/-0.24 points,t=-2.244,P=0.029).The hip pain VAS scores were lower in combination group compared to PCA group in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=5.617,P=0.021).There was no interaction between time factor and group factor(F=2.621,P=0.058).There was statistical difference in the consumption of PCA analgesics between different postoperative timepoints,in other words,there was time effect(F=667.298,P=0.000).The consumption of PCA analgesics was less in combination group compared to PCA group at 0-12,12-24,24-36 and 36-48 hours after surgery(76.49+/-7.69 vs 80.98+/-5.81 ml,t=-2.705,P=0.009; 63.51+/-6.10 vs 69.98+/-5.37 ml,t=-4.636,P=0.000; 45.61+/-4.29 vs 49.76+/-6.01 ml,t=-3.295,P=0.002; 41.28+/-3.75 vs 43.52+/-3.85 ml,t=-2.430,P=0.018).The consumption of PCA analgesics was less in combination group compared to PCA group in general,in other words,there was group effect(F=37.065,P=0.000).There was no interaction between time factor and group factor(F=1.765,P=0.155).The Harris hip scores were higher in combination group compared to PCA group at 2 weeks after surgery(80.37+/-4.56 vs 76.06+/-2.73 points,t=4.693,P=0.000).Nausea and vomiting(6),uroschesis(3),dizziness(2)and somnolence(2)were found in combination group,while nausea and vomiting(13),uroschesis(8),dizziness(3)and somnolence(4)were found in PCA group within 48 hours after surgery.The incidence rate of adverse reactions was lower in combination group compared to PCA group(χ2=16.147,P=0.000).Conclusion:The combination therapy of wrist-ankle acupuncture analgesia and PCA has the advantages of better clinical effects and less consumption of PCA analgesics compared to the monotherapy of PCA in the treatment of hip pain after THA,and it is more conducive to the hip function recovery with less adverse reactions.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] 李文龍,范亞楠,張蕾蕾,等.微創(chuàng)全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)直接前側(cè)入路與外側(cè)小切口入路的對比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(3):24-29.
[2] 楊玉霞,楊樺,范茹,等.直接前入路微創(chuàng)全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)的圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(3):77-78.
[3] 張飛,李奇,林荔軍,等.聯(lián)合多模式鎮(zhèn)痛在全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后的早期療效[J].中華關(guān)節(jié)外科雜志:電子版,2013,7(3):329-332.
[4] Cata JP,Gottumukkala V,Thakar D,et al.Effects of postoperative epidural analgesia on recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Anesth,2014,26(1):3-17.
[5] 中國人民解放軍第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)第一附屬醫(yī)院.講座——腕踝針[J].江蘇醫(yī)藥(中醫(yī)分冊),1976,(2):59-61.
[6] 蔣協(xié)遠(yuǎn),王大偉.骨科臨床療效評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[M].北京:人民衛(wèi)生出版社,2005:123-124.
[7] Harris WH.Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures:treatment by mold arthroplasty.An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969,51(4):737-755.
[8] Goebel S,Steinert AF,Schillinger J,et al.Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(3):491-498.
[9] Kearney M,Jennrich MK,Lyons S,et al.Effects of preoperative education on patient outcomes after joint replacement surgery[J].Orthop Nurs,2011,30(6):391-396.
[10] Devon HA,Piano MR,Rosenfeld AG.The association of pain with protein inflammatory biomarkers a review of the literature[J].Nurs Res,2014,63(1):51-62.
[11] 黃雙英,童培建,吳蔚,等.腕踝針對老年全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛效果的療效評價(jià)[J].中華中醫(yī)藥學(xué)刊,2013,31(5):1014-1016.
[12] 蔡亞紅,葉富英.腕踝針鎮(zhèn)痛作用研究進(jìn)展[J].上海中醫(yī)藥雜志,2013,47(3):82-85.
[13] 馮濤,楊洪建.耳穴聯(lián)合腕踝針對人工髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后的鎮(zhèn)痛作用[J].長春中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2015,31(3):576-579.
[14] 周友龍,張世卿,孫國勝,等.踝三針治療腰椎間盤突出癥根性痛臨床觀察[J].中國針灸,2006,26(12):847-850.
[15] 王浩洋,康鵬德,裴福興,等.全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后多模式鎮(zhèn)痛的有效性及安全性[J].中國矯形外科雜志,2013,21(10):976-980.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]邢金明.切開復(fù)位鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定術(shù)和人工半肩關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù) 治療老年肱骨近端復(fù)雜骨折的對比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):11.
　XING Jinming.A retrospective trial of open reduction and locking plate internal fixation versus artificial shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complicated proximal humeral fractures in old patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):11.
[2]趙云昌.人工股骨頭置換治療老年粉碎性股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):31.
[3]張明強(qiáng).生物型加長柄半髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)治療 高齡不穩(wěn)定股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折療效觀察[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):56.
[4]蔡云仙.圍手術(shù)期耳穴按壓聯(lián)合平衡針療法 在全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):41.
[5]喻長純,楊明路,王戰(zhàn)朝.不同手術(shù)方式治療脛骨平臺骨折畸形愈合的體會[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):37.
[6]魏瑄,宋樹春,王金良.術(shù)前精確測量和評估在全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換治療 成人發(fā)育性髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良繼發(fā)骨關(guān)節(jié)炎中的價(jià)值[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):30.
[7]鮑榮華,陳曉東,王國平,等.Wagner Cone生物型假體置換結(jié)合經(jīng)股骨轉(zhuǎn)子下橫形截骨 治療CroweⅣ型成人發(fā)育性髖關(guān)節(jié)發(fā)育不良[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):33.
[8]喻長純,楊明路,王戰(zhàn)朝.同期髕骨脫位矯正術(shù)聯(lián)合全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)治療 晚期膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎合并習(xí)慣性髕骨脫位[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):41.
[9]武理國,沈軍,傅國海,等.人工肱骨頭置換治療老年肱骨近端復(fù)雜骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(10):70.
[10]李國梁,韓廣普,閆國強(qiáng),等.紅花化瘀湯薰蒸聯(lián)合理筋手法 在膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后康復(fù)中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(12):31.
　Li Guoliang*,Han Guangpu,Yan Guoqiang,et al.Clinical application of HONGHUAHUAYU decoctions steaming combined with sinew adjusting manipulation in the postoperative rehabilitation of total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2013,25(10):31.
[11]樊慶陽,任凱晶.定制3D打印切模輔助全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)治療 膝骨關(guān)節(jié)炎合并股骨干骨折畸形愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):37.
[12]李翰林,童培建.利福平聯(lián)合用藥配合保留假體清創(chuàng)治療 人工關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后早期感染及低毒性感染[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):56.
[13]劉曉雅,孫永強(qiáng),劉國杰.主動快速康復(fù)鍛煉對全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后關(guān)節(jié)活動度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):73.
[14]張維平,康兩期,陳衛(wèi),等.全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)圍手術(shù)期隱性失血的研究進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):61.
[15]宋兵華,孫俊英,倪增良,等.全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)前CT測量股骨后髁角的臨床意義[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):38.
[16]王金良,孫京濤,李玲,等.骨水泥聯(lián)合螺釘修復(fù)全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)中 脛骨平臺內(nèi)側(cè)骨缺損[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):55.
[17]徐偉鋒,葉健,吳連國.強(qiáng)骨飲對骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨頸骨折患者全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后 血清骨代謝生化指標(biāo)和骨密度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):12.
　XU Weifeng,YE Jian,WU Lianguo.Effect of Qianggu Yin(強(qiáng)骨飲,QGY)on serum bone metabolism indexes and bone density after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(10):12.
[18]張榮,王健.人工全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)的圍手術(shù)期心理護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):77.
[19]齊志遠(yuǎn),陳秀民,王在斌,等.桃紅四物加黃芪湯預(yù)防人工髖膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后 下肢深靜脈血栓形成[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):71.
[20]陸吳超,季衛(wèi)鋒,馬鎮(zhèn)川.關(guān)節(jié)鏡下清創(chuàng)后持續(xù)灌洗聯(lián)合中藥口服治療 全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后急性期感染[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):51.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
基金項(xiàng)目:河南省研究生教育創(chuàng)新培養(yǎng)基地2015年度研究生創(chuàng)新基金項(xiàng)目
通訊作者:劉又文 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-20