84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]齊新宇,熊輝,周彪,等.蠲痹歷節(jié)清方干預(yù)雞急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎模型的 實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):5-11.
 QI Xinyu,XIONG Hui,ZHOU Biao,et al.Juanbilijieqing Fang(蠲痹歷節(jié)清方)interfere with acute gouty arthritis chiken model[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):5-11.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

蠲痹歷節(jié)清方干預(yù)雞急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎模型的 實(shí)驗(yàn)研究()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第27卷
期數(shù):
2015年03期
頁碼:
5-11
欄目:
基礎(chǔ)研究
出版日期:
2015-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Juanbilijieqing Fang(蠲痹歷節(jié)清方)interfere with acute gouty arthritis chiken model
作者:
齊新宇1熊輝2周彪1向黎黎1李騰龍1郭玉星1陸小龍2
1.湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué),湖南 長沙 410208;
2.湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)第二附屬醫(yī)院,湖南 長沙 410005
Author(s):
QI Xinyu1XIONG Hui2ZHOU Biao1XIANG Lili1LI Tenglong1GUO Yuxing1LU Xiaolong2
1.Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changsha 410208,Hunan,China
2.The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Changsha 410005,Hunan,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
關(guān)節(jié)炎痛風(fēng)性 蠲痹歷節(jié)清方 疾病模型動(dòng)物 尿酸 黃嘌呤氧化酶 動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)
Keywords:
arthritisgouty Juanbilijieqing Fang disease modelsanimal uric acid xanthine oxidase animal experimentation
摘要:
目的:觀察蠲痹歷節(jié)清方干預(yù)雞急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎模型的療效,并探討其可能的作用機(jī)制。方法:將160只30日齡雄性湘黃雞隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組、模型組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組,每組40只。對(duì)照組以正常飼料喂養(yǎng); 其余3組以蛋白含量為50%的飼料喂養(yǎng),連續(xù)喂養(yǎng)21 d制成急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎模型。自造模結(jié)束后第1天開始,蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組分別以蠲痹歷節(jié)清方湯劑和別嘌醇溶液灌胃,其余2組均以生理鹽水灌胃,每日2次,共21 d。分別于藥物干預(yù)開始后1、7、14、21 d在每組隨機(jī)選出10只雞,分別觀察其一般狀態(tài)、踝關(guān)節(jié)周徑、血尿酸含量和血清黃嘌呤氧化酶(xanthine oxidase,XOD)活性,隨后處死動(dòng)物,分離出左側(cè)踝關(guān)節(jié)滑膜組織,光鏡下觀察其滑膜組織形態(tài)。結(jié)果:①一般狀態(tài)。除對(duì)照組外,其余3組動(dòng)物藥物干預(yù)開始時(shí)精神萎頓,羽毛松亂、灰暗無光澤,飲食減退,雙膝與雙踝關(guān)節(jié)腫大,跛行,站立不穩(wěn),糞便中白色物質(zhì)增多。至藥物干預(yù)后21 d時(shí),蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組和別嘌醇組動(dòng)物一般狀態(tài)基本恢復(fù)正常; 模型組動(dòng)物一般狀態(tài)較開始時(shí)好轉(zhuǎn),但表現(xiàn)較蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組和別嘌醇組差; 對(duì)照組動(dòng)物除體質(zhì)量增加外,其余表現(xiàn)與造模前一致。造模及實(shí)驗(yàn)過程中各組均無動(dòng)物死亡。②踝關(guān)節(jié)周徑。藥物干預(yù)開始后各時(shí)點(diǎn),4組動(dòng)物踝關(guān)節(jié)周徑比較,組間差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=25.172,P=0.000; F=24.445,P=0.000; F=21.237,P=0.014; F=29.881,P=0.041)。藥物干預(yù)開始后1、7、14 d時(shí),模型組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組踝關(guān)節(jié)周徑均大于對(duì)照組(P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.002,P=0.002,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.002,P=0.001); 藥物干預(yù)開始后7、14 d時(shí),蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組和別嘌醇組踝關(guān)節(jié)周徑均小于模型組(P=0.025,P=0.014; P=0.012,P=0.011); 藥物干預(yù)開始后21 d時(shí),對(duì)照組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組踝關(guān)節(jié)周徑均小于模型組(P=0.001,P=0.015,P=0.013); 其余各時(shí)點(diǎn)各組間兩兩比較,組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。③血尿酸含量。藥物干預(yù)開始后各時(shí)點(diǎn),4組動(dòng)物血尿酸含量比較,組間差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=25.361,P=0.003; F=32.371,P=0.005; F=36.734,P=0.021; F=48.336,P=0.023)。藥物干預(yù)開始后1、7、14 d時(shí),模型組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組血尿酸含量均大于對(duì)照組(P=0.000,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.002; P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.001); 藥物干預(yù)開始后7、14 d時(shí),蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組和別嘌醇組血尿酸含量均小于模型組(P=0.011,P=0.010; P=0.014,P=0.002); 藥物干預(yù)開始后21 d時(shí),對(duì)照組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組血尿酸含量均小于模型組(P=0.001,P=0.012,P=0.011); 其余各時(shí)點(diǎn)各組間兩兩比較,組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。④血清XOD活性。藥物干預(yù)開始后各時(shí)點(diǎn),4組動(dòng)物血清XOD活性比較,組間差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=45.721,P=0.001; F=50.634,P=0.002; F=49.448,P=0.013; F=63.124,P=0.027)。藥物干預(yù)開始后1、7、14 d時(shí),模型組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組血清XOD活性均高于對(duì)照組(P=0.002,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.000); 藥物干預(yù)開始后7、14 d時(shí),蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組和別嘌醇組血清XOD活性均低于模型組(P=0.001,P=0.013; P=0.002,P=0.015); 藥物干預(yù)開始后21 d時(shí),對(duì)照組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組血清XOD活性均低于模型組(P=0.001,P=0.013,P=0.017); 其余各時(shí)點(diǎn)各組間兩兩比較,組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。⑤滑膜組織形態(tài)。藥物干預(yù)開始后各時(shí)點(diǎn),4組動(dòng)物滑膜中血管數(shù)量比較,組間差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=24.772,P=0.032; F=33.176,P=0.021; F=32.672,P=0.003; F=44.351,P=0.000)。藥物干預(yù)開始后1、7、14 、21 d時(shí),模型組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組滑膜中血管數(shù)量均多于對(duì)照組(P=0.002,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.002; P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.003,P=0.002); 藥物干預(yù)開始后7、14、21 d時(shí),蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組和別嘌醇組滑膜中血管數(shù)量均多于模型組(P=0.001,P=0.013; P=0.014,P=0.011; P=0.001,P=0.012); 其余各時(shí)點(diǎn)各組間兩兩比較,組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。藥物干預(yù)開始后各時(shí)點(diǎn),4組動(dòng)物滑膜中中性粒細(xì)胞數(shù)量比較,組間差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=32.347,P=0.001; F=43.561,P=0.001; F=42.361,P=0.014; F=51.745,P=0.011)。藥物干預(yù)開始后1、7、14 d時(shí),模型組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組滑膜中中性粒細(xì)胞數(shù)量均多于對(duì)照組(P=0.001,P=0.002,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.002; P=0.002,P=0.001,P= 0.001); 藥物干預(yù)開始后7、14 d時(shí),蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組和別嘌醇組滑膜中中性粒細(xì)胞數(shù)量均少于模型組(P=0.017,P=0.014; P=0.012,P=0.014); 藥物干預(yù)開始后21 d時(shí),對(duì)照組、蠲痹歷節(jié)清方組及別嘌醇組滑膜中中性粒細(xì)胞數(shù)量均少于模型組(P=0.001,P=0.013,P=0.017); 其余各時(shí)點(diǎn)各組間兩兩比較,組間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。結(jié)論:蠲痹歷節(jié)清方可通過抑制XOD活性,有效降低血尿酸水平,緩解雞急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎模型臨床癥狀,其療效與別嘌醇相當(dāng)。
Abstract:
Objective:Objective: To observe the effect of Juanbilijieqing Fang(蠲痹歷節(jié)清方)on acute gouty arthritis chiken model and to explore the mechanism of action.Methods:One hundred and sixty 30-day-old male XIANGHUANG chickens were randomly divided into control group,model group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group,40 cases in each group.The chickens in control group were fed with normal feedstuff,while the chickens in other groups were fed for consecutive 21 days with feedstuff which protein content was 50% to made into acute gouty arthritis models.After the end of the modeling,the chickens in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group were intragastric administrated with Juanbilijieqing decoction and allopurinol solution respectively,while chickens in the other 2 groups were intragastric administrated with normal saline,twice a day for 21 consecutive days.Ten chickens were randomly selected from each group at 1,7,14 and 21 days after the beginning of drug intervention respectively; and the general state,ankle circumference,blood uric acid levels and serum xanthine oxidase(XOD)activity were observed respectively.Then the chickens were executed and the left ankle synovium were separated for observing the synovial tissue morphology under the optical microscope.Results:The chickens except those in control group became lethargic and their feathers became disorderly loose and matte and their eating and drinking began to decrease.Both knees and ankles began to swell up,and limping and unstable standing were found.White matters increased in feces.The general state of chickens in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group basically returned to normal at 21 days after the beginning of the drug intervention.The chickens in model group improved in the general state,while their performance were worse than that of chickens in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group.No change except increased body mass were found in the chickens in control group.No chickens died in each group during the modeling and experimental process.There was statistical difference in ankle circumference between the 4 groups at different timepoints after the beginning of the drug intervention(F=25.172,P=0.000; F=24.445,P=0.000; F=21.237,P=0.014; F=29.881,P=0.041).The ankle circumference was greater in model group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with control group at 1,7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.002,P=0.002,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.002,P=0.001).The ankle circumference was less in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.025,P=0.014; P=0.012,P=0.011).The ankle circumference was less in control group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 21 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.015,P=0.013).There was no statistical difference in the ankle circumference between the paired groups at other timepoints.There was statistical difference in blood uric acid levels between the 4 groups at different timepoints after the beginning of the drug intervention(F=25.361,P=0.003; F=32.371,P=0.005; F=36.734,P=0.021; F=48.336,P=0.023).The blood uric acid levels were greater in model group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with control group at 1,7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.000,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.002; P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.001).The blood uric acid levels were less in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.011,P=0.010; P=0.014,P=0.002).The blood uric acid levels were less in control group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 21 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.012,P=0.011).There was no statistical difference in the blood uric acid levels between the paired groups at other timepoints.There was statistical difference in serum XOD activity between the 4 groups at different timepoints after the beginning of the drug intervention(F=45.721,P=0.001; F=50.634,P=0.002; F=49.448,P=0.013; F=63.124,P=0.027).The serum XOD activity was greater in model group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with control group at 1,7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.002,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.000).The serum XOD activity was less in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.013; P=0.002,P=0.015).The serum XOD activity was less in control group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 21 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.013,P=0.017).There was no statistical difference in serum XOD activity between the paired groups at other timepoints.There was statistical difference in the number of blood vessels in synovium between the 4 groups at different timepoints after the beginning of the drug intervention(F=24.772,P=0.032; F=33.176,P=0.021; F=32.672,P=0.003; F=44.351,P=0.000).The number of blood vessels in synovium was more in model group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with control group at 1,7,14 and 21 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.002,P=0.001,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.002; P=0.001,P=0.000,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.003,P=0.002).The number of blood vessels in synovium was more in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 7,14 and 21 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.013; P=0.014,P=0.011; P=0.001,P=0.012).There was no statistical difference in the number of blood vessels in synovium between the paired groups at other timepoints.There was statistical difference in the number of neutrophils in synovium between the 4 groups at different timepoints after the beginning of the drug intervention(F=32.347,P=0.001; F=43.561,P=0.001; F=42.361,P=0.014; F=51.745,P=0.011).The number of neutrophils in synovium was more in model group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with control group at 1,7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.002,P=0.001; P=0.001,P=0.001,P=0.002; P=0.002,P=0.001,P=0.001).The number of neutrophils in synovium was less in Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 7 and 14 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.017,P=0.014; P=0.012,P=0.014).The number of neutrophils in synovium was less in control group,Juanbilijieqing group and allopurinol group compared with model group at 21 days after the beginning of the drug intervention(P=0.001,P=0.013,P=0.017).There was no statistical difference in the number of neutrophils in synovium between the paired groups at other timepoints.Conclusion:Juanbilijieqing Fang can effectively reduce the blood uric acid levels and relieve the clinical symptoms of acute gouty arthritis models through decreasing the activity of XOD,and it is similar to allopurinol in the curative effect.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] 熊輝,曲良燁,向黎黎,等.痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎濕熱證病證結(jié)合模型的建立[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(3):14-20.
[2] 尤力都孜·買買提,熱比姑麗·伊斯拉木,阿布都吉力力·阿布都艾尼.痛風(fēng)及其動(dòng)物模型研究初探[J].中藥藥理與臨床,2012,28(3):172-173.
[3] 齊新宇,董大立,熊輝,等.蠲痹歷節(jié)清方治療急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎濕熱證療效觀察[J].湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2014,34(5):42-44.
[4] 齊新宇.蠲痹歷節(jié)清方對(duì)實(shí)驗(yàn)性雞痛風(fēng)模型血尿酸代謝的影響[D].長沙:湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué),2014.
[5] 齊新宇,向黎黎,熊輝,等.基于高蛋白飲食環(huán)境下痛風(fēng)模型的量效研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(2):1-6.
[6] 朱小甫,吳旭錦,鄭義華.高鈣高蛋白日糧復(fù)制禽痛風(fēng)病例研究[J].黑龍江畜牧獸醫(yī),2013,21(6):36-37.
[7] 任予勇.實(shí)驗(yàn)性雞高尿酸血癥模型的建立[J].淮北職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2013,12(5):133-135.
[8] 黃繼漢,黃曉暉,陳志揚(yáng),等.藥理試驗(yàn)中動(dòng)物間和動(dòng)物與人體間的等效劑量換算[J].中國臨床藥理學(xué)與治療學(xué),2004,9(9):1069-1072.
[9] 匡紅艷,程太平,胡建兵,等.雞持續(xù)高尿酸血癥模型的制備方法研究[J].四川動(dòng)物,2008,27(4):554-558.
[10] 蘇友新,陳偉宏,王和鳴,等.高尿酸血癥及痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎的動(dòng)物模型研究概況[J].中國骨傷,2004,17(7):444-445.
[11] 樓秀余.人類痛風(fēng)病與UOX基因沉默相關(guān)的研究[J].中外醫(yī)學(xué)研究,2012,10(29):154-155.
[12] 孔悅,張冰,劉小青,等.黃嘌呤氧化酶活性在高尿酸血癥動(dòng)物模型中的變化[J].北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2004,27(6):38-40.
[13] 齊萬虎,蔣企洲,蔣建勤.黃瑞香中化學(xué)成分抑制黃嘌呤氧化酶活性及其機(jī)制研究[J].中國實(shí)驗(yàn)方劑學(xué)雜志,2014,20(5):141-144.
[14] 熊輝,姜國勇,胡楠,等.痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎中醫(yī)證素及證型的聚類研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2011,23(11):26-28.
[15] 吳小芳,劉書珍.清熱瀉濕湯治療急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎60例觀察與護(hù)理[J].實(shí)用中醫(yī)藥雜志,2014,30(4):278.
[16] 嚴(yán)立平,周正球.清熱利濕方治療急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎38例臨床觀察[J].吉林中醫(yī)藥,2012,32(6):600-601.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]鄧偉哲,王宏晶,王宇恒,等.微創(chuàng)針刀鏡治療難治性膝關(guān)節(jié)類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):42.
[2]李藝彬,朱勇,吳昭克.關(guān)節(jié)鏡下多入路全關(guān)節(jié)滑膜清理術(shù)治療肘關(guān)節(jié)類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):56.
[3]胡鋼鋒,肖魯偉,童培建.關(guān)節(jié)液代謝組學(xué)在類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎診斷 及寒熱證候分型中的應(yīng)用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):5.
 HU Gangfeng,XIAO Luwei,TONG Peijian.Application of joint fluid metabolomics to diagnosis and COLD-HEAT SYMPTOM COMPLEX typing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):5.
[4]熊輝,曲良燁,向黎黎,等.痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎濕熱證病證結(jié)合模型的建立[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(03):14.
 Xiong Hui*,Qu Liangye,Xiang Lili,et al.A rat model of gouty arthritis combined with dampness-heat syndrome[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(03):14.
[5]孫克民,王平,盧啟貴,等.關(guān)節(jié)鏡下滑膜切除術(shù)聯(lián)合中藥口服 治療早期膝關(guān)節(jié)類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(09):39.
[6]李峰,郭艷幸,曹向陽,等.貫葉連翹灌胃聯(lián)合光動(dòng)力療法對(duì)類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎白兔膝關(guān)節(jié)滑膜組織病理形態(tài)的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(09):6.
 Li Feng*,Guo Yanxing,Cao Xiangyang,et al.Effect of intragastric administration of hypericum perforatum combined with photodynamic therapy on the pathological morphology of synovial tissue of knee joints in rabbits with rheumatoid arthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(03):6.
[7]嚴(yán)超,劉喜德,張金祿,等.蜂針療法治療膝骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎的護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(01):74.
[8]王笑青,張永紅,侯宏理,等.頑痹清丸聯(lián)合非甾體抗炎藥及改善病情的抗風(fēng)濕藥治療濕熱痹阻型類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(03):41.
 WANG Xiao-qing*,ZHANG Yong-hong,HOU Hong-li,et al.Curative effect and safety of WANBIQING pills combined with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of dampness-heat stagnation type[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2013,25(03):41.
[9]黃建武,黃建華,林愛麗.扶中清痹通絡(luò)湯聯(lián)合益賽普對(duì)活動(dòng)期類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎患者腫瘤壞死因子-α及血管內(nèi)皮生長因子血清含量的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(05):9.
 HUANG Jian-wu*,HUANG Jian-hua,LIN Ai-li.*.Effect of FUZHONG QINGBI TONGLUO decoction combined with etanercept on the serum contents of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2013,25(03):9.
[10]赫軍,李麗華,王相奇,等.痛風(fēng)四妙湯加味治療痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(05):56.
[11]齊新宇,向黎黎,熊輝,等.基于高蛋白飲食建立雞痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎模型的量效關(guān)系研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):1.
 QI Xinyu,XIANG Lili,XIONG Hui,et al.A dose-effect relationship study of gouty arthritis chicken model built by high-protein diet[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(03):1.
[12]陳鵬,郭文韜,龍美兵,等.退癀消腫湯聯(lián)合洛索洛芬鈉片治療急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(08):19.
 CHEN Peng,GUO Wentao,LONG Meibing,et al.Clinical study on Tuihuang Xiaozhong Tang(退癀消腫湯)combined with loxoprofen sodium tablets for treatment of acute gouty arthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(03):19.
[13]孫瑞,郭愛菊,杜梅紅,等.能譜CT尿酸基(鈣 圖像在慢性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎診斷中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(03):30.
[14]閔星星,王鵬鵬,劉佳歡,等.第1跖趾關(guān)節(jié)痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎的手術(shù)治療進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2018,30(01):47.
[15]郭玉星,熊輝,周彪,等.Nod樣受體家族含pyrin結(jié)構(gòu)域蛋白3 和嘌呤能離子通道型受體7在急性痛風(fēng)性 關(guān)節(jié)炎發(fā)病中的作用研究進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2018,30(08):39.
[16]蔣恩宇,孫波.中藥外敷法治療急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎的研究進(jìn)展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2019,31(04):56.
[17]徐艷玲,杜獻(xiàn)麗,杜敏,等.痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎的延續(xù)護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2020,32(05):74.
[18]陳兆軍,梁歡,馬玉峰,等.痛點(diǎn)超聲電導(dǎo)透射清熱利濕方藥治療急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎濕熱瘀結(jié)證[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2021,33(12):48.
[19]鄧志軍,楊文龍,李典,等.楊鳳云教授治療旴江流域痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎的經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2023,35(05):64.
[20]顧富城,楊美鑫,林惠紅,等.基于Toll樣受體/髓系分化初級(jí)反應(yīng)蛋白質(zhì)88信號(hào)通路探討四妙湯加土茯苓方治療急性痛風(fēng)性關(guān)節(jié)炎的作用機(jī)制[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2024,36(08):9.
 GU Fucheng,YANG Meixin,LIN Huihong,et al.The mechanism of Simiaotang and Tufuling Fang(四妙湯加土茯苓方)for treatment of acute gouty arthritis:a Toll-like receptor/myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 signaling pathway-based experimental study[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2024,36(03):9.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
2015-01-14收稿 2015-02-06修回
基金項(xiàng)目:湖南省自然科學(xué)基金(13JJ3102); 湖南省中醫(yī)藥管理局項(xiàng)目(201411)
通訊作者:熊輝 E-mail:[email protected]
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-03-30