84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]吳連國,劉康,黃俊俊,等.強骨飲對股骨頸骨折患者人工股骨頭置換術后假體周圍骨密度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2014,26(04):15-18.
 Wu Lianguo*,Liu Kang,Huang Junjun,et al.Effect of QIANGGU DRINK on peri-prosthetic bone density after artificial femoral head replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2014,26(04):15-18.
點擊復制

強骨飲對股骨頸骨折患者人工股骨頭置換術后假體周圍骨 密度的影響()
分享到:

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第26卷
期數(shù):
2014年04期
頁碼:
15-18
欄目:
臨床研究
出版日期:
2014-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of QIANGGU DRINK on peri-prosthetic bone density after artificial femoral head replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures
作者:
吳連國1劉康1黃俊俊1毛應德龍1陳華2史曉林1
1.浙江中醫(yī)藥大學附屬第二醫(yī)院,浙江 杭州 310005; 2.浙江中醫(yī)藥大學附屬第三醫(yī)院,浙江 杭州 310005
Author(s):
Wu Lianguo*Liu KangHuang JunjunMao YingdelongChen HuaShi Xiaolin.*
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hangzhou 310005,Zhejiang,China
關鍵詞:
關節(jié)成形術置換髖 骨密度 股骨頸骨折 手術后并發(fā)癥 強骨飲
Keywords:
Arthroplastyreplacementhip Bone density Femoral neck fractures Postoperative complications QIANGGU DRINK
摘要:
目的:探討強骨飲對股骨頸骨折患者人工股骨頭置換術后假體周圍骨密度的影響。方法:股骨頸骨折患者78例,按就診順序隨機分為觀察組和對照組,每組39例; 2組患者均進行人工股骨頭置換術,術后分別采用口服鈣爾奇D片和強骨飲及單純口服鈣爾奇D片進行干預。觀察2組患者術后髖關節(jié)功能恢復情況; 將人工假體柄周圍分為7個區(qū)(R1~R7),測量2組患者各區(qū)術后1周、術后3個月、術后6個月時假體周圍的骨密度,并進行比較。結果:78例患者均順利完成手術,74例獲得隨訪,觀察組失訪3例,對照組失訪1例; 隨訪時間9~24個月,中位數(shù)18.5個月; 患肢疼痛緩解、髖關節(jié)功能恢復。參照Harris髖關節(jié)評分標準對患肢髖關節(jié)進行評分,治療組(87.5±7.6)分,對照組(86.7±8.1)分,2組間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(t=10.437,P=0.896)。均無假體松動等并發(fā)癥發(fā)生。R1區(qū),各時間點間骨密度值比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(F=76.367,P=0.000),存在時間效應; 2組間骨密度值比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(F=6.375,P=0.001),存在分組效應; 術后1周,2組間骨密度值比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義[(0.772±0.214)g·cm-2,(0.761±0.178)g·cm-2; t=0.578,P=0.683); 術后3個月、術后6個月,觀察組骨密度值均高于對照組[(0.758±0.268)g·cm-2,(0.602±0.244)g·cm-2; t=2.232,P=0.024;(0.732±0.227)g·cm-2,(0.518±0.188)g·cm-2; t=2.847,P=0.004)]; 時間因素和分組因素存在交互效應(F=36.726,P=0.000)。R2~R6區(qū)骨密度值 [R2:(1.532±0.342)g·cm-2,(1.478±0.451)g·cm-2,(1.432±0.403)g·cm-2;(1.613±0.268)g·cm-2,(1.582±0.265)g·cm-2,(1.533±0.275)g·cm-2。R3:(1.746±0.276)g·cm-2,(1.641±0.324)g·cm-2,(1.615±0.327)g·cm-2;(1.692±0.312)g·cm-2,(1.634±0.403)g·cm-2,(1.589±0.157)g·cm-2。R4:(1.831±0.302)g·cm-2,(1.768±0.256)g·cm-2,(1.711±0.236)g·cm-2;(1.798±0.275)g·cm-2,(1.735±0.358)g·cm-2,(1.636±0.326)g·cm-2。R5:(1.736±0.257)g·cm-2,(1.677±0.389)g·cm-2,(1.632±0.324)g·cm-2;(1.812±0.362)g·cm-2,(1.752±0.265)g·cm-2,(1.698±0.424)g·cm-2。R6:(1.563±0.352)g·cm-2,(1.612±0.327)g·cm-2,(1.578±0.367)g·cm-2;(1.642±0.279)g·cm-2,(1.598±0.278)g·cm-2(1.504±0.276)g·cm-2]各時間點間比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(F=2.468,P=0.162; F=1.569,P=0.453; F=1.862,P=0.358; F=3.556,P=0.112; F=4.065,P=0.104); 2組間比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(F=1.679,P=0.153; F=0.879,P=0.553; F=2.568,P=0.122; F=3.512,P=0.098; F=4.679,P=0.082); 時間因素和分組因素存在交互效應(F=26.765,P=0.000; F=23.343,P=0.000; F=28.276,P=0.000; F=21.825,P=0.000; F=26.468,P=0.000)。R7區(qū),各時間點間骨密度值比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(F=52.828,P=0.000),存在時間效應; 2組間骨密度值比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(F=12.476,P=0.000),存在分組效應; 術后1周,2組間骨密度值比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義[(1.292±0.262)g·cm-2,(1.203±0.322)g·cm-2; t=1.578,P=0.167]; 術后3個月、術后6個月,觀察組骨密度值均高于對照組[(1.178±0.345)g·cm-2,(0.869±0.159)g·cm-2; t=3.025,P=0.002;(1.123±0.312)g·cm-2,(0.752±0.328)g·cm-2; t=4.745,P=0.000]; 時間因素和分組因素存在交互效應(F=32.478,P=0.000)。結論:強骨飲可增加股骨頸骨折患者人工股骨頭置換術后股骨近端假體周圍的骨密度。
Abstract:
Objective:To study the effect of QIANGGU DRINK on peri-prosthetic bone density after artificial femoral head in patients with femoral neck fractures.Methods:Seventy-eight patients with femoral neck fractures were randomly divided into observation group and control group according to the visit sequence,39 cases in each group.All of the patients in the 2 groups were treated with artificial femoral head replacement,and then they were treated with oral application of caltrate D tablets combined with QIANGGU DRINK and monotherapy of oral application of caltrate D tablets respectively.Postoperative hip function restoration were reviewed and compared between the 2 groups.The areas around artificial prosthesis stem were divided into 7 zones(R1~R7)and the bone density was measured in each zone and compared between the 2 groups at 1 week and 3 and 6 months after the surgery.Results:The surgery were performed successfully in all the patients and 74 patients were available for follow-up.Three patients lost to follow-up in observation group and one patient lost to follow-up in control group.The median follow-up period was 18.5 years(range,9-24 months).The pain were relieved and the function of the hip joint were recovered in all the patients.The hip performance were evaluated according to the Harris Hip Score and the results showed that there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups(87.5+/-7.6 vs 86.7+/-8.1 points,t=10.437,P=0.896).No complications such as prosthesis loosening were found in the two groups.There was statistical difference in the bone density between different time points in R1 zone(F=76.367,P=0.000),in other words,there was time effect.There was statistical difference in the bone density between the 2 groups(F=6.375,P=0.001),in other words,there was group effect.There was no statistical difference in the bone density between the 2 groups one week after the surgery(0.772+/-0.214 vs 0.761+/-0.178 g/cm(2); t=0.578,P=0.683).The bone density of observation group were higher than those of control group 3 and 6 months after the surgery(0.758+/-0.268 vs 0.602+/-0.244 g/cm(2); t=2.232,P=0.024; 0.732+/-0.227 vs 0.518+/-0.188 g/cm(2); t=2.847,P=0.004).There was interaction between time factor and grouping factor(F=36.726,P=0.000).There was no statistical difference in the bone density of R2~R6 zones(R2:1.532+/-0.342,1.478+/-0.451,1.432+/-0.403 g/cm(2); 1.613+/-0.268,1.582+/-0.265,1.533+/-0.275 g/cm(2).R3:1.746+/-0.276,1.641+/-0.324,1.615+/-0.327 g·cm(2); 1.692+/-0.312,1.634+/-0.403,1.589+/-0.157 g/cm(2).R4:1.831+/-0.302,1.768+/-0.256,1.711+/-0.236 g/cm(2); 1.798+/-0.275,1.735+/-0.358,1.636+/-0.326 g/cm(2).R5:1.736+/-0.257,1.677+/-0.389,1.632+/-0.324 g/cm(2); 1.812+/-0.362,1.752+/-0.265,1.698+/-0.424 g/cm(2).R6:1.563+/-0.352,1.612+/-0.327,1.578+/-0.367 g/cm(2); 1.642+/-0.279,1.598+/-0.278,1.504+/-0.276 g/cm(2))between different time points(F=2.468,P=0.162; F=1.569,P=0.453; F=1.862,P=0.358; F=3.556,P=0.112; F=4.065,P=0.104).There was no statistical difference in the bone density between the 2 groups(F=1.679,P=0.153; F=0.879,P=0.553; F=2.568,P=0.122:F=3.512,P=0.098; F=4.679,P=0.082).There was interaction between time factor and grouping factor(F=26.765,P=0.000; F=23.343,P=0.000; F=28.276,P=0.000; F=21.825,P=0.000; F=26.468,P=0.000).There was statistical difference in the bone density between different time points in R7 zone(F=52.828,P=0.000),in other words,there was time effect.There was statistical difference in the bone density between the 2 groups(F=12.476,P=0.000),in other words,there was grouping effect.There was no statistical difference in the bone density between the 2 groups at one week after the surgery(1.292+/-0.262 vs 1.203+/-0.322 g/cm(2); t=1.578,P=0.167).The bone density of observation group were higher than those of control group at three and six months after the surgery(1.178+/-0.345 vs 0.869+/-0.159 g/cm(2); t=3.025,P=0.002; 1.123+/-0.312 vs 0.752+/-0.328 g/cm(2); t=4.745,P=0.000).There was interaction between time factor and grouping factor(F=32.478,P=0.000).Conclusion:QIANGGU DRINK can increase proximal femoral peri-prosthetic bone density after artificial femoral head replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures.

參考文獻/References:

[1] Pivec R,Johnson AJ,Mears SC,et al.Hip arthroplasty[J].Lancet,2012,380(9855):1768-1777.
[2] Sabokbar A,Kudo O,Athanasou NA.Two distinct cellular mechanisms of osteoclast formation and bone resorption inperiprosthetic osteolysis[J].J Orthop Res,2003,21(1):73-80.
[3] Catelas I,Jacobs JJ.Biologic activity of wear particles[J].Instr Course Lect,2010,59:3-16.
[4] 吳連國,劉康,王定,等.強骨飲治療骨關節(jié)炎合并骨質(zhì)疏松患者的臨床研究[J].中國中醫(yī)骨傷科雜志,2011,19(12):10-13.
[5] 吳連國,王定,朱彥昭,等.強骨飲治療原發(fā)性骨質(zhì)疏松癥的臨床研究[J].中國中醫(yī)藥科技,2009,16(3):167-168.
[6] Gruen TA,McNeice GM,Amstutz HC."Modes of failure"of cemented stem-type femoral components:a radiographic analysis of loosening[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1979,(141):17-27.
[7] Harris WH.Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures:treatment by moldarthroplasty.An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969,51(4):737-755.
[8] Mulcahy H,Chew FS.Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists:part 2,revisions and complications[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2012,199(3):570-580.
[9] Mulliken BD,Bourne RB,Rorabeck CH,et al.A tapered titanium femoral stem inserted without cement in a total hip arthroplasty.Radiographic evaluation and stability[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1996,78(8):1214-1225.
[10] Engh CA Jr,McAuley JP,Sychterz CJ,et al.The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding.Apostmortem analysis[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000,82-A(10):1414-1420.
[11] Weinans H,Sumner DR,Igloria R,et al.Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models[J].J Biomech,2000,33(7):809-817.
[12] Gallinaro P,Massè A,Leonardi F,et al.Eight-to ten-year results of a variable geometry stem[J].Orthopedics,2007,30(11):954-958.
[13] 吳連國,陳華,史曉林,等.益氣補腎溫經(jīng)法對去卵巢大鼠股骨頸骨形態(tài)計量學的影響[J].浙江中醫(yī)藥大學學報,2008,32(1):36-40.

相似文獻/References:

[1]邢金明.切開復位鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定術和人工半肩關節(jié)置換術 治療老年肱骨近端復雜骨折的對比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):11.
 XING Jinming.A retrospective trial of open reduction and locking plate internal fixation versus artificial shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complicated proximal humeral fractures in old patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(04):11.
[2]趙云昌.人工股骨頭置換治療老年粉碎性股骨轉子間骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):31.
[3]張明強.生物型加長柄半髖關節(jié)置換術治療 高齡不穩(wěn)定股骨轉子間骨折療效觀察[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):56.
[4]蔡云仙.圍手術期耳穴按壓聯(lián)合平衡針療法 在全膝關節(jié)置換術后鎮(zhèn)痛中的應用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(06):41.
[5]喻長純,楊明路,王戰(zhàn)朝.不同手術方式治療脛骨平臺骨折畸形愈合的體會[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):37.
[6]魏瑄,宋樹春,王金良.術前精確測量和評估在全髖關節(jié)置換治療 成人發(fā)育性髖關節(jié)發(fā)育不良繼發(fā)骨關節(jié)炎中的價值[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):30.
[7]鮑榮華,陳曉東,王國平,等.Wagner Cone生物型假體置換結合經(jīng)股骨轉子下橫形截骨 治療CroweⅣ型成人發(fā)育性髖關節(jié)發(fā)育不良[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):33.
[8]喻長純,楊明路,王戰(zhàn)朝.同期髕骨脫位矯正術聯(lián)合全膝關節(jié)置換術治療 晚期膝骨關節(jié)炎合并習慣性髕骨脫位[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):41.
[9]武理國,沈軍,傅國海,等.人工肱骨頭置換治療老年肱骨近端復雜骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(10):70.
[10]李國梁,韓廣普,閆國強,等.紅花化瘀湯薰蒸聯(lián)合理筋手法 在膝骨關節(jié)炎全膝關節(jié)置換術后康復中的應用[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2013,25(12):31.
 Li Guoliang*,Han Guangpu,Yan Guoqiang,et al.Clinical application of HONGHUAHUAYU decoctions steaming combined with sinew adjusting manipulation in the postoperative rehabilitation of total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2013,25(04):31.
[11]樊慶陽,任凱晶.定制3D打印切模輔助全膝關節(jié)置換術治療 膝骨關節(jié)炎合并股骨干骨折畸形愈合[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):37.
[12]李翰林,童培建.利福平聯(lián)合用藥配合保留假體清創(chuàng)治療 人工關節(jié)置換術后早期感染及低毒性感染[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):56.
[13]劉曉雅,孫永強,劉國杰.主動快速康復鍛煉對全膝關節(jié)置換術后關節(jié)活動度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(09):73.
[14]張維平,康兩期,陳衛(wèi),等.全髖關節(jié)置換術圍手術期隱性失血的研究進展[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(08):61.
[15]宋兵華,孫俊英,倪增良,等.全膝關節(jié)置換術前CT測量股骨后髁角的臨床意義[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(07):38.
[16]王金良,孫京濤,李玲,等.骨水泥聯(lián)合螺釘修復全膝關節(jié)置換術中 脛骨平臺內(nèi)側骨缺損[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(12):55.
[17]徐偉鋒,葉健,吳連國.強骨飲對骨質(zhì)疏松性股骨頸骨折患者全髖關節(jié)置換術后 血清骨代謝生化指標和骨密度的影響[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(02):12.
 XU Weifeng,YE Jian,WU Lianguo.Effect of Qianggu Yin(強骨飲,QGY)on serum bone metabolism indexes and bone density after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(04):12.
[18]張榮,王健.人工全膝關節(jié)置換術的圍手術期心理護理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):77.
[19]齊志遠,陳秀民,王在斌,等.桃紅四物加黃芪湯預防人工髖膝關節(jié)置換術后 下肢深靜脈血栓形成[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(03):71.
[20]陸吳超,季衛(wèi)鋒,馬鎮(zhèn)川.關節(jié)鏡下清創(chuàng)后持續(xù)灌洗聯(lián)合中藥口服治療 全膝關節(jié)置換術后急性期感染[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(01):51.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
基金項目:中國博士后科學基金項目(2013M530290),國家中醫(yī)藥管理局2013年度中醫(yī)藥行業(yè)科研專項項目(201307010),浙江省自然科學基金資助項目(LY12H27013),浙江省醫(yī)壇新秀培養(yǎng)對象資助項目(浙衛(wèi)發(fā)2013-245號),浙江省博士后科研項目擇優(yōu)資助項目(BSH1302082),2013年浙江省醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生科技計劃項目(2013KYA143)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01