84年鼠女哪年财运最旺,857comvvv色九欧美激情|85PO_87国产精品欲av国产av资源

[1]劉超,仇成華,徐達(dá)強(qiáng).兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)幕z率和加壓力研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2025,37(02):28-33.
　LIU Chao,QIU Chenghua,XU Daqiang.The thread stripping rate and pressurization force of a two-segmental lag screw:a biomechanical study[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2025,37(02):28-33.
點(diǎn)擊復(fù)制

兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)幕z率和加壓力研究()
分享到：

《中醫(yī)正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第37卷
期數(shù):
2025年02期
頁(yè)碼:
28-33
欄目:
基礎(chǔ)研究
出版日期:
2025-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The thread stripping rate and pressurization force of a two-segmental lag screw:a biomechanical study
作者:
劉超1; 仇成華2; 徐達(dá)強(qiáng)2
(1.河南省洛陽(yáng)正骨醫(yī)院/河南省骨科醫(yī)院,河南 洛陽(yáng) 471002; 2.鹽城市第三人民醫(yī)院,江蘇 鹽城 224008)
Author(s):
LIU Chao1; QIU Chenghua2; XU Daqiang2
1.Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital,Luoyang 471002,Henan,China 2.Yancheng Third People's Hospital,Yancheng 224008,Jiangsu,China
關(guān)鍵詞:
骨螺絲;  骨質(zhì)疏松性骨折;  松質(zhì)骨;  滑絲;  加壓力
Keywords:
bone screws;  osteoporotic fractures;  cancellous bone;  screw damage;  intensity of stress
摘要:
目的:觀察兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)幕z率和加壓力。方法:招募10位骨科醫(yī)生和1位獨(dú)立研究員,在密度為0.08 g·cm-3、0.16 g·cm-3、0.32 g·cm-3的合成松質(zhì)骨塊上進(jìn)行實(shí)驗(yàn)。在相同密度的合成松質(zhì)骨塊上,每位醫(yī)生分別使用兩段式拉力螺釘和AO拉力螺釘各擰緊10次。10位醫(yī)生在3種密度的合成松質(zhì)骨塊上共操作600次。在醫(yī)生操作完成后,研究員繼續(xù)擰緊螺釘,直至加壓力明顯下降,以確保每次測(cè)試所得的加壓力曲線均包含上升期、峰值和下降期3個(gè)階段。測(cè)量并比較醫(yī)生與研究員擰緊螺釘時(shí)的加壓力,判斷螺釘是否滑絲。同時(shí),記錄醫(yī)生停止擰緊螺釘時(shí)的加壓力,以比較兩段式拉力螺釘與AO拉力螺釘?shù)募訅毫Α＝Y(jié)果:兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)幕z率低于AO拉力螺釘(5.33%,75.67%,χ2=307.923,P=0.000)。不同醫(yī)生之間,兩段式拉力螺釘和AO拉力螺釘?shù)幕z率均存在差異(χ2=109.366,P=0.000; χ2=17.430,P=0.042)。在密度為0.08 g·cm-3、0.16 g·cm-3、0.32 g·cm-3的合成松質(zhì)骨塊上,兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)幕z率均低于AO拉力螺釘(χ2=126.750,P=0.000; χ2=101.282,P=0.000; χ2=82.353,P=0.000)。不同密度合成松質(zhì)骨塊之間,兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)幕z率存在差異(χ2=6.470,P=0.039),AO拉力螺釘滑絲率的差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=1.340,P=0.512)。兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)恼w加壓力高于AO拉力螺釘(t=-5.800,P=0.000)。兩段式拉力螺釘和AO拉力螺釘?shù)募訅毫S合成松質(zhì)骨塊密度的增加而增加(F=2812.63,P=0.000; F=755.193,P=0.000)。結(jié)論:相同規(guī)格的兩段式拉力螺釘?shù)募訅毫Ω哂贏O拉力螺釘,且滑絲率低于AO拉力螺釘。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the thread stripping rate and pressurization force of a two-segmental lag screw(TSLS).Methods:Ten orthopedic surgeons and an independent investigator were recruited to conduct the experiments on synthetic cancellous bone blocks with densities of 0.08,0.16,and 0.32 g/cm(3),respectively.On the synthetic cancellous bone block with the same density,the TSLS and AO lag screw(AOLS)were tightened 10 times,respectively,by each surgeon.In total,the 10 surgeons operated on the synthetic cancellous bone blocks with three different densities for 600 times.After each surgeon finished the operation,the independent investigator advanced the screw until a remarkable decrease of pressurization force was observed,thereby ensuring the pressurization force curve obtained from each test included the ascending phase,the peak value phase,and the descending phase.The pressurization force applied by each surgeon and the investigator when tightened the screw were measured and compared to determine whether the thread was stripped.Meanwhile,the pressurization forces when the surgeons stopped tightening the screw were recorded to analyze the difference of the pressurization force between TSLS and AOLS.Results:The thread stripping rate of TSLS was lower than that of AOLS(5.33%,75.67%,χ2=307.923,P=0.000).There was difference in the thread stripping rate of TSLS and AOLS among different surgeons(χ2=109.366,P=0.000; χ2=17.430,P=0.042).The thread stripping rate of TSLS was lower than that of AOLS on the synthetic cancellous bone blocks with densities of 0.08,0.16,and 0.32 g/cm(3),respectively(χ2=126.750,P=0.000; χ2=101.282,P=0.000; χ2=82.353,P=0.000).Further comparison revealed that there was difference in the thread stripping rate of TSLS,while,no statistical difference in the thread stripping rate of AOLS among the synthetic cancellous bone blocks with different densities(χ2=6.470,P=0.039; χ2=1.340,P=0.512).The overall pressurization force of TSLS was higher than that of AOLS(t=-5.800,P=0.000).The pressurization force of both TSLS and AOLS increased with the increase in the density of the synthetic cancellous bone blocks(F=2812.63,P=0.000; F=755.193,P=0.000).Conclusion:TSLS has a higher pressurization force and a lower thread stripping rate compared to AOLS with the same specification.

參考文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1] 陳金洪.漂膝損傷的診斷與治療[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2002,14(1):17-18.
[2] TOULOUPAKIS G,GHIRARDELLI S,THEODORAKIS E,et al.A modified anterolateral swashbuckler approach for distal femoral fractures:description and outcomes[J].Acta Biomed,2022,93(1):e2022005.
[3] ZHANG J,WEI Y,LI G,et al.Interfragmentary lag screw and locking plate combination in simple distal femoral fractures:A finite element analysis[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2021,55(1):9-15.
[4] VICENTI G,BIZZOCA D,NAPPI V S,et al.The impact of lag screw in the healing time of distal tibia fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis:A randomized clinical trial[J].Injury,2020,51(Suppl 3):S80-S85.
[5] WICHLAS F,HAYBÄCK G,HOFMANN V,et al.Advancing fracture management:the role of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in orthopedic trauma care[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2024,50(5):2331-2344.
[6] COLDING-RASMUSSEN T,SCHWARZENBERG P,HORSTMANN P F,et al.Biomechanical variability and usability of a novel customizable fracture fixation technique[J].Bioengineering(Basel),2023,10(10):1146.
[7] BENEDIKT S,KAISER P,SCHMIDLE G,et al.Lessons learned with the Cobra prosthesis in elderly patients with complex distal radius fractures-a retrospective follow-up study[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2022,142(2):343-353.
[8] LAMPROPOULOU-ADAMIDOU K,KARAMPINAS P K,CHRONOPOULOS E,et al.Currents of plate osteosynthesis in osteoporotic bone[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(4):427-433.
[9] 徐達(dá)強(qiáng).一種應(yīng)用于部分關(guān)節(jié)骨折的可量化扭力的螺紋型加壓裝置:201110154601.4[P].2011-10-19.
[10] XU D Q,SUN P D,WANG J,et al.The new shank construct of lag screw improves the maximum compression force for internal fixations:preliminary results[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2015,19(12):2195-2201.
[11] STOESZ M J,GUSTAFSON P A,PATEL B V,et al.Surgeon perception of cancellous screw fixation[J].J Orthop Trauma,2014,28(1):e1-e7.
中醫(yī)正骨2025年2月第37卷第2期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2025,Vol.37,No.2(總113)
(總114)中醫(yī)正骨2025年2月第37卷第2期 J Trad Chin Orthop Trauma,2025,Vol.37,No.2
[12] FLETCHER J W A,NEUMANN V,WENZEL L,et al.Variations in non-locking screw insertion conditions generate unpredictable changes to achieved fixation tightness and stripping rates[J].Clin Biomech(Bristol),2020,80:105201.
[13] FLETCHER J W A,NEUMANN V,WENZEL L,et al.Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2021,16(1):642.
[14] FLETCHER J W A,WENZEL L,NEUMANN V,et al.Surgical performance when inserting non-locking screws:a syste-matic review[J].EFORT Open Rev,2020,5(1):26-36.
[15] ADDEVICO F,SOLITRO G F,MORANDI M M.Salvaging pull-out strength in a previously stripped screw site:a comparison of three rescue techniques[J].J Funct Morphol Kinesiol,2021,6(3):71.
[16] ZENG L,WANG Y,HE D,et al.The effectiveness of a self-made modular elastic compression device for patients with a fracture of the tibia and fibula[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2020,15(1):153.
[17] SRINIVASAN A,YOUNG M,AMBROSE C,et al.Maintenance of compression with a positional screw versus compression generated with a lag screw[J].J Orthop Trauma,2019,33(11):564-568.
[18] FENG X,LUO Z,LI Y,et al.Fixation stability comparison of bone screws based on thread design:buttress thread,triangle thread,and square thread[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):820.
[19] USAMI T,TAKADA N,IWATA H,et al.A biomechanical analysis of the effect of hydroxyapatite augmentation for trochanteric femoral fractures[J].Exp Ther Med,2023,25(6):256.
[20] FLETCHER J W A,ZDERIC I,GUEORGUIEV B,et al.Stripping torques in human bone can be reliably predicted prior to screw insertion with optimum tightness being found between 70% and 80% of the maximum[J].Bone Joint Res,2020,9(8):493-500.
[21] REYNOLDS K J,CLEEK T M,MOHTAR A A,et al.Predicting cancellous bone failure during screw insertion[J].J Biomech,2013,46(6):1207-1210.
[22] WILKIE J,JALAL N A,RAUTER G,et al.Segmenting/pre-processing data from bone screw thread-stripping tests[J].Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc,2023,2023:1-4.
[23] POILLIOT A,GAY-DUJAK M H,MÜLLER-GERBL M.The quantification of 3D-trabecular architecture of the fourth cervical vertebra using CT osteoabsorptiometry and micro-CT[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2023,18(1):297.
[24] VAHIDI G,FLOOK H,SHERK V,et al.Bone biomechanical properties and tissue-scale bone quality in a genetic mouse model of familial dysautonomia[J].Osteoporos Int,2021,32(11):2335-2346.
[25] XU G,WANG Q,LI Z,et al.Computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry:review of bone density,mechanical strength of material and clinical application[J].Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2023,11:1066709.
[26] 徐達(dá)強(qiáng),孫培棟,趙加力,等.兩段式拉力螺釘和AO拉力螺釘加壓性能和加壓后釘?shù)罁p傷程度比較[J].中國(guó)臨床解剖學(xué)雜志,2022,40(6):710-713.

相似文獻(xiàn)/References:

[1]許兵,葉小雨,王蕭楓,等.小管徑經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療 骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體重度壓縮骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(11):29.
[2]謝小利,李曉程.經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體 壓縮骨折的圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(05):79.
[3]郭世明,石玲玲,郭志民,等.手法復(fù)位石膏外固定和切開(kāi)復(fù)位鋼板內(nèi)固定治療 骨質(zhì)疏松性橈骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的比較研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2015,27(04):15.
　GUO Shiming,SHI Lingling,GUO Zhimin,et al.A comparative study of manual reduction and plaster external fixation versus open reduction and plate internal fixation for treatment of osteoporotic distal radius fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(02):15.
[4]李格,梅偉,劉沛霖,等.骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)后鄰近椎體再骨折的危險(xiǎn)因素探討[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(06):18.
　LI Ge,MEI Wei,LIU Peilin,et al.Investigation on risk factors for adjacent vertebral refractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(02):18.
[5]徐無(wú)忌,劉曉嵐.體位復(fù)位結(jié)合經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)與經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的對(duì)比研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(07):20.
　XU Wuji,LIU Xiaolan.Effect of Qianggu Yin(強(qiáng)骨飲,QGY)on bone microstructure in the ovariectomized osteoporosis rats[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(02):20.
[6]張旭橋,王曉暉,黃光明,等.生骨膠囊在經(jīng)皮椎體強(qiáng)化術(shù)治療老年骨質(zhì)疏松性胸腰椎骨折中的應(yīng)用研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2016,28(11):21.
　ZHANG Xuqiao,WANG Xiaohui,HUANG Guangming,et al.Application of Shenggu Jiaonang(生骨膠囊)to the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in the aged who received percutaneous vertebral augmentation[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(02):21.
[7]張 濤.常規(guī)抗骨質(zhì)疏松療法聯(lián)合脈沖射頻術(shù)和銀質(zhì)針?biāo)山庑g(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(04):74.
[8]牛強(qiáng)衛(wèi).手法復(fù)位聯(lián)合經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)和中醫(yī)骨折三期辨證用藥治療骨質(zhì)疏松性胸腰椎壓縮骨折的臨床研究[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(04):16.
　NIU Qiangwei.A clinical study of manipulative reduction combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty and oral application of traditional Chinese medicine according ……[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(02):16.
[9]楊慶賢,曹翠萍,曹哲.常規(guī)抗骨質(zhì)疏松療法聯(lián)合腰腹肌訓(xùn)練治療原發(fā)性骨質(zhì)疏松腰背部疼痛[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(06):72.
[10]王建民,李華東,王振東.溫針灸結(jié)合補(bǔ)陽(yáng)還五湯口服治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折經(jīng)皮椎體后凸成形術(shù)后殘留痛[J].中醫(yī)正骨,2017,29(11):69.

備注/Memo

備注/Memo:
基金項(xiàng)目:國(guó)家骨科與運(yùn)動(dòng)康復(fù)臨床醫(yī)學(xué)研究中心創(chuàng)新基金資助項(xiàng)目(2021-NCRC-CXJJ-ZH-19)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01